Suppr超能文献

在荷兰一个正汉坦病毒流行地区使用诊断普马拉病毒实时 RT-PCR。

Use of a diagnostic Puumala virus real-time RT-PCR in an orthohantavirus endemic region in the Netherlands.

机构信息

Laboratory for Medical Microbiology and Public Health, Hengelo, Overijssel, the Netherlands.

Department of Internal Medicine, Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Overijssel, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Jul 2;12(7):e0381323. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03813-23. Epub 2024 Jun 10.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Laboratory diagnosis of orthohantavirus infection is primarily based on serology. However, for a confirmed serological diagnosis, evaluation of a follow-up serum sample is essential, which is time consuming and causes delay. Real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) tests, if positive, provide an immediate and definitive diagnosis, and accurately identify the causative agent, where the discriminative nature of serology is suboptimal. We re-evaluated sera from orthohantavirus-suspected clinical cases in the Dutch regions of and from July 2014 to April 2016 for the presence of Puumala orthohantavirus (PUUV), Tula orthohantavirus (TULV), and Seoul orthohantavirus (SEOV) RNA. PUUV RNA was detected in 11% of the total number ( = 85) of sera tested, in 50% of sera positive for anti-PUUV/TULV IgM ( = 16), and in 1.4% of sera negative or indeterminate for anti-PUUV/TULV IgM ( = 69). No evidence was found for the presence of TULV or SEOV viral RNA. Based on these findings, we propose two algorithms to implement real-time RT-PCR testing in routine orthohantavirus diagnostics, which optimally provide clinicians with early confirmed diagnoses and could prevent possible further invasive testing and treatment.

IMPORTANCE

The addition of a real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction test to routine orthohantavirus diagnostics may better aid clinical decision making than the use of standard serology tests alone. Awareness by clinicians and clinical microbiologists of this advantage may ultimately lead to a reduction in over-hospitalization and unnecessary invasive diagnostic procedures.

摘要

未加标签

针对 orthohantavirus 感染的实验室诊断主要基于血清学。然而,为了确诊血清学诊断,评估后续血清样本是必不可少的,这既耗时又会导致延误。如果实时逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测呈阳性,则可提供即时和明确的诊断,并准确识别病原体,而血清学的鉴别性质则不太理想。我们重新评估了 2014 年 7 月至 2016 年 4 月荷兰 和 地区疑似 orthohantavirus 临床病例的血清,以检测 Puumala orthohantavirus(PUUV)、Tula orthohantavirus(TULV)和 Seoul orthohantavirus(SEOV)RNA。在检测的总血清数(=85)中,有 11%检测到了 PUUV RNA,在抗-PUUV/TULV IgM 阳性的血清中(=16)有 50%检测到了 PUUV RNA,而在抗-PUUV/TULV IgM 阴性或不确定的血清中(=69)有 1.4%检测到了 PUUV RNA。未发现 TULV 或 SEOV 病毒 RNA 的存在。基于这些发现,我们提出了两种算法,以在常规 orthohantavirus 诊断中实施实时 RT-PCR 检测,这可以为临床医生提供最佳的早期确诊,并可以防止可能进行的进一步侵入性检测和治疗。

重要性

在常规 orthohantavirus 诊断中添加实时 RT-PCR 检测可能比单独使用标准血清学检测更有助于临床决策。临床医生和临床微生物学家意识到这一优势,最终可能会减少过度住院和不必要的侵入性诊断程序。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d0f/11218528/d14a20dee0ec/spectrum.03813-23.f001.jpg

相似文献

1
Use of a diagnostic Puumala virus real-time RT-PCR in an orthohantavirus endemic region in the Netherlands.
Microbiol Spectr. 2024 Jul 2;12(7):e0381323. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.03813-23. Epub 2024 Jun 10.
5
Serological investigation of orthohantaviruses in patients with fever of unknown origin in Kazakhstan.
Zoonoses Public Health. 2020 May;67(3):271-279. doi: 10.1111/zph.12683. Epub 2020 Jan 19.
6
Different cross-reactivity of human and rodent sera to Tula virus and Puumala virus.
Comp Immunol Microbiol Infect Dis. 2010 Dec;33(6):e67-73. doi: 10.1016/j.cimid.2010.01.001. Epub 2010 Feb 8.
9
High Prevalence of Tula Hantavirus in Common Voles in The Netherlands.
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2017 Mar;17(3):200-205. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2016.1995. Epub 2017 Jan 23.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

2
Evaluation of Real-Time RT-PCR for Diagnostic Use in Detection of Puumala Virus.
Viruses. 2019 Jul 19;11(7):661. doi: 10.3390/v11070661.
5
Autochthonous Human Case of Seoul Virus Infection, the Netherlands.
Emerg Infect Dis. 2018;24(12):2158-2163. doi: 10.3201/eid2412.180229. Epub 2018 Dec 17.
6
Prevalence of spp. and Seoul hantavirus in brown rats () in four regions in the Netherlands, 2011-2015.
Infect Ecol Epidemiol. 2018 Jun 26;8(1):1490135. doi: 10.1080/20008686.2018.1490135. eCollection 2018.
7
Seroprevalence of hantaviruses and in muskrat and coypu trappers in the Netherlands, 2016.
Infect Ecol Epidemiol. 2018 May 16;8(1):1474707. doi: 10.1080/20008686.2018.1474707. eCollection 2018.
10
High Prevalence of Tula Hantavirus in Common Voles in The Netherlands.
Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis. 2017 Mar;17(3):200-205. doi: 10.1089/vbz.2016.1995. Epub 2017 Jan 23.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验