• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

抗DNA抗体:常规诊断工作中检测方法的选择

Anti-DNA antibodies: the choice of assays for routine diagnostic work.

作者信息

Sarvas H, Gripenberg M, Leirisalo-Repo M

出版信息

Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand C. 1985 Feb;93(1):13-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1985.tb02915.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1699-0463.1985.tb02915.x
PMID:3885680
Abstract

Sixty-six sera from 23 patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), 26 sera from patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and 22 sera from normal healthy subjects were tested for the presence of antibodies against native (ds) DNA by the Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test and by the Farr assay, and for the presence of antibodies against denaturated (ss) DNA by the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Anti-dsDNA antibodies were detected in 57% of the SLE patients by the Crithidia test and in 65% by the Farr assay. Two of the RA sera were positive in the Crithidia test, whereas all were Farr negative. Anti-ssDNA antibodies of IgG class could be detected in 74% of the SLE patients and in none of the RA sera, while anti-ssDNA antibodies of IgM class were found in 26% of the SLE patients and in one RA serum. There was a good correlation between the results of the Farr assay and the IgG-anti-ssDNA ELISA but no agreement was found between the results of the Farr assay and the Crithidia test. We also measured the amount of C-reactive protein (CRP) in the sera but no correlation was seen between the levels of CRP and anti-DNA antibodies. We conclude that the demonstration of anti-ssDNA antibodies of IgG class is a good screening method in the diagnosis of SLE, and that antibodies against native DNA should be determined, preferably both by the Crithidia test and the Farr assay to confirm the diagnosis and in the follow-up of the patients.

摘要

采用利什曼原虫免疫荧光试验和法尔测定法检测了23例系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)患者的66份血清、类风湿性关节炎(RA)患者的26份血清以及正常健康受试者的22份血清中抗天然(双链)DNA抗体的存在情况,并采用酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)检测了抗变性(单链)DNA抗体的存在情况。通过利什曼原虫试验,57%的SLE患者检测到抗双链DNA抗体,通过法尔测定法这一比例为65%。2份RA血清在利什曼原虫试验中呈阳性,而在法尔测定中均为阴性。74%的SLE患者可检测到IgG类抗单链DNA抗体,RA血清中均未检测到,而26%的SLE患者和1份RA血清中发现有IgM类抗单链DNA抗体。法尔测定结果与IgG抗单链DNA ELISA结果之间存在良好相关性,但法尔测定结果与利什曼原虫试验结果之间未发现一致性。我们还测量了血清中C反应蛋白(CRP)的含量,但未发现CRP水平与抗DNA抗体之间存在相关性。我们得出结论,IgG类抗单链DNA抗体的检测是SLE诊断的一种良好筛查方法,并且应测定抗天然DNA抗体,最好同时采用利什曼原虫试验和法尔测定法来确诊并对患者进行随访。

相似文献

1
Anti-DNA antibodies: the choice of assays for routine diagnostic work.抗DNA抗体:常规诊断工作中检测方法的选择
Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand C. 1985 Feb;93(1):13-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1985.tb02915.x.
2
The clinical significance of measuring different anti-dsDNA antibodies by using the Farr assay, an enzyme immunoassay and a Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test.使用Farr试验、酶免疫测定法和利什曼原虫免疫荧光试验检测不同抗双链DNA抗体的临床意义。
Lupus. 1992 Dec;1(6):369-77. doi: 10.1177/096120339200100606.
3
Diagnosing systemic lupus erythematosus: new-generation immunoassays for measurement of anti-dsDNA antibodies are an effective alternative to the Farr technique and the Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test.诊断系统性红斑狼疮:新一代免疫测定法用于检测抗 dsDNA 抗体是替代 Farr 技术和克氏锥虫免疫荧光试验的有效方法。
Lupus. 2010 Jul;19(8):906-12. doi: 10.1177/0961203310362995. Epub 2010 Feb 23.
4
[Determination of anti dsDNA antibodies by immunofluorescence using Crithidia luciliae. I--Diagnostic and prognostic value in systemic lupus erythematosus. Comparison with the Farr radioimmunoassay].利用鲁氏锥虫通过免疫荧光法测定抗双链DNA抗体。I——在系统性红斑狼疮中的诊断和预后价值。与法尔放射免疫分析法的比较
Rev Rhum Mal Osteoartic. 1984 Apr;51(4):185-91.
5
Clinical significance of anti-nDNA antibodies in ANA-positive systemic lupus erythematosus: comparison of the Farr radioimmunoassay and the Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescent technique.抗核抗体阳性系统性红斑狼疮中抗双链DNA抗体的临床意义:Farr放射免疫分析法与利什曼原虫免疫荧光技术的比较
Zhonghua Min Guo Wei Sheng Wu Ji Mian Yi Xue Za Zhi. 1985 Feb;18(1):15-24.
6
Measurement of anti-DNA antibodies by ELISA: a comparative study with Crithidia and a Farr assay.通过酶联免疫吸附测定法检测抗DNA抗体:与克氏锥虫法及法尔氏测定法的比较研究
Pathology. 1991 Jan;23(1):21-4. doi: 10.3109/00313029109061435.
7
[Detection of dsDNA antibodies in diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus--comparative studies of diagnostic effectiveness of 3 ELISA methods with different antigens and a Crithidia luciliae immunofluorescence test].[双链DNA抗体检测在系统性红斑狼疮诊断中的应用——三种不同抗原的酶联免疫吸附测定法与利什曼原虫免疫荧光试验诊断效能的比较研究]
Z Rheumatol. 1997 Mar-Apr;56(2):53-62. doi: 10.1007/s003930050020.
8
Anti-dsDNA antibodies and disease classification in antinuclear antibody positive patients: the role of analytical diversity.抗双链DNA抗体与抗核抗体阳性患者的疾病分类:分析多样性的作用
Ann Rheum Dis. 2004 Apr;63(4):386-94. doi: 10.1136/ard.2003.016303.
9
Detection of anti-DNA antibodies: a comparison between two Farr assays, Crithidia luciliae and a human chromosomal substrate assay.抗DNA抗体的检测:两种Farr检测法、利什曼原虫检测法和一种人类染色体底物检测法之间的比较
Br J Rheumatol. 1988 Jun;27(3):206-10. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/27.3.206.
10
[Comparison of indirect immunofluorescence on Crithidia luciliae of Farr test, and immunoenzymatic methods for the screening of anti-native DNA autoantibodies].[法尔氏试验中对克氏锥虫的间接免疫荧光法与免疫酶法筛查抗天然DNA自身抗体的比较]
Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 1994;52(9):645-50.

引用本文的文献

1
The use of laboratory tests in the diagnosis of SLE.实验室检查在系统性红斑狼疮诊断中的应用。
J Clin Pathol. 2000 Jun;53(6):424-32. doi: 10.1136/jcp.53.6.424.
2
Anti-DNA antibodies of IgA class in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus.系统性红斑狼疮患者的IgA类抗DNA抗体
Rheumatol Int. 1986;6(2):53-5. doi: 10.1007/BF00541504.
3
Anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies in the healthy elderly: prevalence and characteristics.
J Clin Immunol. 1990 Nov;10(6):300-3. doi: 10.1007/BF00917474.