Nguyen Ha, Vandewalle Giovani, Mertens Birgit, Collard Jean-Francois, Hinsenkamp Maurice, Verschaeve Luc, Feipel Veronique, Magne Isabelle, Souques Martine, Beauvois Véronique, Ledent Maryse
Laboratoire de Recherche en Orthopédie Traumatologie, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Chemical and Physical Health Risks, Sciensano, Brussels, Belgium.
Bioelectromagnetics. 2024 Sep;45(6):260-280. doi: 10.1002/bem.22506. Epub 2024 Jun 11.
Human cytogenetic biomonitoring (HCB) has long been used to evaluate the potential effects of work environments on the DNA integrity of workers. However, HCB studies on the genotoxic effects of occupational exposure to extremely low-frequency electromagnetic fields (ELF-MFs) were limited by the quality of the exposure assessment. More specifically, concerns were raised regarding the method of exposure assessment, the selection of exposure metrics, and the definition of exposure group. In this study, genotoxic effects of occupational exposure to ELF-MFs were assessed on peripheral blood lymphocytes of 88 workers from the electrical sector using the comet and cytokinesis-block micronucleus assay, considering workers' actual exposure over three consecutive days. Different methods were applied to define exposure groups. Overall, the summarized ELF-MF data indicated a low exposure level in the whole study population. It also showed that relying solely on job titles might misclassify 12 workers into exposure groups. We proposed combining hierarchical agglomerative clustering on personal exposure data and job titles to define exposure groups. The final results showed that occupational MF exposure did not significantly induce more genetic damage. Other factors such as age or past smoking rather than ELF-MF exposure could affect the cytogenetic test outcomes.
人类细胞遗传生物监测(HCB)长期以来一直用于评估工作环境对工人DNA完整性的潜在影响。然而,关于职业暴露于极低频电磁场(ELF-MFs)的遗传毒性作用的HCB研究受到暴露评估质量的限制。更具体地说,人们对暴露评估方法、暴露指标的选择以及暴露组的定义提出了担忧。在本研究中,使用彗星试验和胞质分裂阻滞微核试验,对来自电力部门的88名工人的外周血淋巴细胞评估职业暴露于ELF-MFs的遗传毒性作用,同时考虑工人连续三天的实际暴露情况。应用不同方法定义暴露组。总体而言,汇总的ELF-MF数据表明整个研究人群的暴露水平较低。研究还表明,仅依靠职位头衔可能会将12名工人错误分类到暴露组中。我们建议结合个人暴露数据和职位头衔的层次凝聚聚类来定义暴露组。最终结果表明,职业性MF暴露并未显著诱导更多的遗传损伤。年龄或既往吸烟等其他因素而非ELF-MF暴露可能会影响细胞遗传学检测结果。