Suppr超能文献

热染料技术测量危重症患者血管外肺水的临床研究。

Clinical studies of measuring extravascular lung water by the thermal dye technique in critically ill patients.

作者信息

Sibbald W J, Warshawski F J, Short A K, Harris J, Lefcoe M S, Holliday R L

出版信息

Chest. 1983 May;83(5):725-31. doi: 10.1378/chest.83.5.725.

Abstract

We measured extravascular lung water (EVLW) by the thermal-dye technique in a broad group of critically ill patients who had either acute cardiac or noncardiac illnesses. A portable AP supine chest roentgenogram, reviewed blindly, was used to classify patients as to the presence or absence of pulmonary edema; by clinical history we categorized patients into either a cardiac or noncardiac (ie, ARDS) group. With a normal chest roentgenogram, the mean EVLW was 5.6 +/- 1.8 ml/kg, and the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) was 11.3 +/- 5.3 mm Hg (mean +/- SD). In contrast, patients with pulmonary edema on a cardiac basis had a mean EVLW of 10.2 +/- 3.1 ml/kg (mean PCWP, 20.5 +/- 8.2 mm Hg), while patients with clinically defined noncardiac pulmonary edema and a normal PCWP (11.6 +/- 5.7 mm Hg) had a mean EVLW of 15.8 +/- 4.6 ml/kg, significantly higher than in the cardiac group (p less than 0.001). On a severity system of 014, the EVLW increased in parallel to the severity of the chest radiologic appearance of edema in both the cardiac (r2 = .44; p less than 0.001) and noncardiac (r2 = .59; p less than 0.001) patients. This study defined a normal range of thermal-dye EVLW in critically ill patients without radiologic evidence of pulmonary edema. We further demonstrated the increased pulmonary microvascular permeability of noncardiac pulmonary edema compared with cardiac edema by the greater EVLW at normal microvascular hydrostatic pressures in the former group.

摘要

我们采用热染料技术对一大组患有急性心脏疾病或非心脏疾病的重症患者进行血管外肺水(EVLW)测量。使用一张便携式前后位仰卧胸部X线片,由不知情的人员进行阅片,以此将患者分为有或无肺水肿;根据临床病史,我们将患者分为心脏疾病组或非心脏疾病组(即急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)组)。胸部X线片正常的患者,其平均血管外肺水为5.6±1.8ml/kg,肺毛细血管楔压(PCWP)为11.3±5.3mmHg(平均值±标准差)。相比之下,心脏原因导致肺水肿的患者平均血管外肺水为10.2±3.1ml/kg(平均PCWP为20.5±8.2mmHg),而临床诊断为非心脏性肺水肿且PCWP正常(11.6±5.7mmHg)的患者平均血管外肺水为15.8±4.6ml/kg,显著高于心脏疾病组(p<0.001)。在0至14的严重程度系统中,心脏疾病患者(r2 = 0.44;p<0.001)和非心脏疾病患者(r2 = 0.59;p<0.001)的血管外肺水均与水肿的胸部放射学表现严重程度呈平行增加。本研究确定了无肺水肿放射学证据的重症患者热染料法血管外肺水的正常范围。我们进一步证明,与心脏性水肿相比,非心脏性肺水肿患者肺微血管通透性增加,因为在前一组中,正常微血管静水压下血管外肺水更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验