• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

提高农村初级保健中的结直肠癌筛查效果:合作性邮寄粪便免疫化学检测试验的初步效果和实施。

Improving colorectal cancer screening in rural primary care: Preliminary effectiveness and implementation of a collaborative mailed fecal immunochemical test pilot.

机构信息

Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Portland, Oregon, USA.

Department of Family Medicine and School of Public Health, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA.

出版信息

J Rural Health. 2023 Jan;39(1):279-290. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12685. Epub 2022 Jun 15.

DOI:10.1111/jrh.12685
PMID:35703582
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9969840/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Mailed fecal immunochemical test (FIT) outreach can improve colorectal cancer (CRC) screening rates. We piloted a collaborative mailed FIT program with health plans and rural clinics to evaluate preliminary effectiveness and refine implementation strategies.

METHODS

We conducted a single-arm study using a convergent, parallel mixed-methods design to evaluate the implementation of a collaborative mailed FIT program. Enrollees were identified using health plan claims and confirmed via clinic scrub. The intervention included a vendor-delivered automated phone call (auto-call) prompt, FIT mailing, and reminder auto-call; clinics were encouraged to make live reminder calls. Practice facilitation was the primary implementation strategy. At 12 months post mailing, we assessed the rates of: (1) mailed FIT return and (2) completion of any CRC screening. We took fieldnotes and conducted postintervention key informant interviews to assess implementation outcomes (eg, feasibility, acceptability, and adaptations).

RESULTS

One hundred and sixty-nine Medicaid or Medicare enrollees were mailed a FIT. Over the 12-month intervention, 62 participants (37%) completed screening of which 21% completed the mailed FIT (most were returned within 3 months), and 15% screened by other methods (FITs distributed in-clinic, colonoscopy). Enrollee demographics and the reminder call may encourage mailed FIT completion. Program feasibility and acceptability was high and supported by perceived positive benefit, alignment with existing workflows, adequate staffing, and practice facilitation.

CONCLUSION

Collaborative health plan-clinic mailed FIT programs are feasible and acceptable for implementation in rural clinics and support CRC screening completion. Studies that pragmatically test collaborative approaches to mailed FIT and patient navigation follow-up after abnormal FIT and support broad scale-up in rural settings are needed.

摘要

背景

邮寄粪便免疫化学测试(FIT)外展可以提高结直肠癌(CRC)的筛查率。我们与健康计划和农村诊所合作,试点了一个协作式邮寄 FIT 计划,以评估初步效果并完善实施策略。

方法

我们采用收敛平行混合方法设计进行了一项单臂研究,以评估协作式邮寄 FIT 计划的实施情况。使用健康计划的索赔记录和诊所的核对来确认参与者的身份。干预措施包括供应商提供的自动电话(自动呼叫)提示、FIT 邮寄和提醒自动呼叫;诊所被鼓励进行实时提醒电话呼叫。实践促进是主要的实施策略。在邮寄后的 12 个月,我们评估了以下指标的比率:(1)邮寄 FIT 的返回率和(2)任何 CRC 筛查的完成率。我们记录了实地笔记并进行了干预后关键知情人访谈,以评估实施结果(例如,可行性、可接受性和适应性)。

结果

有 169 名医疗补助或医疗保险的参保人收到了 FIT 的邮寄。在 12 个月的干预期间,有 62 名参与者(37%)完成了筛查,其中 21%完成了邮寄 FIT(大多数在 3 个月内返回),15%通过其他方法进行了筛查(在诊所分发的 FIT、结肠镜检查)。参保人的人口统计学特征和提醒电话可能会鼓励邮寄 FIT 的完成。该计划的可行性和可接受性很高,这得益于感知到的积极效益、与现有工作流程的一致性、充足的人员配备和实践促进。

结论

协作式健康计划-诊所邮寄 FIT 计划在农村诊所中是可行且可接受的,可以支持 CRC 筛查的完成。需要进行更具实用性的研究,以测试邮寄 FIT 和异常 FIT 后的患者导航随访的协作方法,并支持在农村地区的广泛推广。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7c9/9969840/2b0cb8eae0e7/nihms-1868988-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7c9/9969840/1c4eceede163/nihms-1868988-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7c9/9969840/2b0cb8eae0e7/nihms-1868988-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7c9/9969840/1c4eceede163/nihms-1868988-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e7c9/9969840/2b0cb8eae0e7/nihms-1868988-f0002.jpg

相似文献

1
Improving colorectal cancer screening in rural primary care: Preliminary effectiveness and implementation of a collaborative mailed fecal immunochemical test pilot.提高农村初级保健中的结直肠癌筛查效果:合作性邮寄粪便免疫化学检测试验的初步效果和实施。
J Rural Health. 2023 Jan;39(1):279-290. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12685. Epub 2022 Jun 15.
2
Mailed fecal testing and patient navigation versus usual care to improve rates of colorectal cancer screening and follow-up colonoscopy in rural Medicaid enrollees: a cluster-randomized controlled trial.邮寄粪便检测与患者引导服务对比常规护理以提高农村医疗补助参保者的结直肠癌筛查率及后续结肠镜检查率:一项整群随机对照试验
Implement Sci Commun. 2022 Apr 13;3(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s43058-022-00285-3.
3
Direct-to-member mailed colorectal cancer screening outreach for Medicaid and Medicare enrollees: Implementation and effectiveness outcomes from the BeneFIT study.针对医疗补助计划和医疗保险参保人的直接向成员邮寄的结直肠癌筛查外展活动:BeneFIT 研究的实施和效果结果。
Cancer. 2020 Feb 1;126(3):540-548. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32567. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
4
Health plan-based mailed fecal testing for colorectal cancer screening among dual-eligible Medicaid/Medicare enrollees: Outcomes of 2 program models.基于健康计划的邮寄粪便检测在双重合格的 Medicaid/Medicare 参保者中的结直肠癌筛查:2 种方案模式的结果。
Cancer. 2022 Jan 15;128(2):410-418. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33909. Epub 2021 Sep 29.
5
Effectiveness of a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Outreach Program in Community Health Clinics: The STOP CRC Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.社区健康诊所中邮寄式结直肠癌筛查推广项目的效果:STOP CRC 整群随机临床试验
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Sep 1;178(9):1174-1181. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.3629.
6
First-year implementation of mailed FIT colorectal cancer screening programs in two Medicaid/Medicare health insurance plans: qualitative learnings from health plan quality improvement staff and leaders.在两个医疗补助/医疗保险计划中首次实施邮寄粪便免疫化学测试进行结直肠癌筛查项目:来自医疗保健计划质量改进工作人员和领导人的定性经验教训。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 21;20(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4868-5.
7
Using a continuum of hybrid effectiveness-implementation studies to put research-tested colorectal screening interventions into practice.利用混合有效性-实施研究的连续体将经过研究检验的结直肠癌筛查干预措施付诸实践。
Implement Sci. 2019 May 29;14(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0903-5.
8
Effectiveness and Cost of an Enhanced Mailed Fecal Test Outreach Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: Findings from the PROMPT Stepped-Wedge Trial.强化邮寄粪便检测推广的结直肠癌筛查项目的有效性与成本:PROMPT阶梯楔形试验的结果
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2023 Nov 1;32(11):1608-1616. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-0597.
9
Mailed fecal immunochemical test outreach for colorectal cancer screening: Summary of a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention-sponsored Summit.邮寄粪便免疫化学试验进行结直肠癌筛查:疾病预防控制中心主办的峰会总结。
CA Cancer J Clin. 2020 Jul;70(4):283-298. doi: 10.3322/caac.21615. Epub 2020 Jun 25.
10
Costs of Two Health Insurance Plan Programs to Mail Fecal Immunochemical Tests to Medicare and Medicaid Plan Members.两种医疗保险计划项目向医疗保险和医疗补助计划成员邮寄粪便免疫化学检测的成本。
Popul Health Manag. 2021 Apr;24(2):255-265. doi: 10.1089/pop.2020.0041. Epub 2020 Jun 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Approaches to address common barriers to colorectal cancer screening in rural communities of the CDC's colorectal cancer control program.美国疾病控制与预防中心结直肠癌控制项目中针对农村社区结直肠癌筛查常见障碍的应对方法。
Prev Oncol Epidemiol. 2025 May 19;3(1). doi: 10.1080/28322134.2025.2504900.
2
It's a good idea, but are they willing? Assessing pharmacist willingness to deliver colorectal cancer screening.这是个好主意,但他们愿意吗?评估药剂师开展结直肠癌筛查的意愿。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2025 Jul 30. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-25-0275.
3
Interventions to Increase Colorectal Cancer Screening Uptake in Rural Settings: A Scoping Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinic Factors Associated With Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) Completion: The Difference-Making Role of Support Staff.与邮寄粪便免疫化学检测 (FIT) 完成相关的临床因素:支持人员的重要作用。
Ann Fam Med. 2022 Mar-Apr;20(2):123-129. doi: 10.1370/afm.2772.
2
An observational study of workflows to support fecal testing for colorectal cancer screening in primary care practices serving Medicaid enrollees.一项观察性研究,旨在支持在为医疗补助计划参保者提供服务的初级保健实践中进行粪便检测以进行结直肠癌筛查的工作流程。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Jan 25;22(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-09106-7.
3
Increased Colorectal Cancer Screening Sustained with Mailed Fecal Immunochemical Test Outreach.
提高农村地区结直肠癌筛查参与率的干预措施:一项范围综述
Prev Chronic Dis. 2025 Jul 17;22:E44. doi: 10.5888/pcd22.250025.
4
Difference-making factors for successful implementation of a multicomponent colorectal cancer screening program in rural clinics (SMARTER CRC).农村诊所成功实施多组分结直肠癌筛查项目(SMARTER CRC)的影响因素
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 25;12:1522738. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1522738. eCollection 2025.
5
Mailed Outreach and Patient Navigation for Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Rural Medicaid Enrollees: A Cluster Randomized Clinical Trial.针对农村医疗补助计划参保者的结直肠癌筛查邮件外展与患者导航服务:一项整群随机临床试验
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Mar 3;8(3):e250928. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.0928.
6
Colorectal cancer: local results and significance in Hungary.结直肠癌:匈牙利的局部结果及意义
J Gastrointest Oncol. 2024 Dec 31;15(6):2552-2577. doi: 10.21037/jgo-24-318. Epub 2024 Dec 28.
7
Where should the cancer control interventions target: A geospatial hotspot analysis for major cancer mortality 2018-2022 in the U.S.癌症控制干预措施应针对何处:美国2018 - 2022年主要癌症死亡率的地理空间热点分析
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024 Dec 5. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0957.
8
Virtual practice facilitation as an implementation strategy for launching opioid safety committees for quality improvement in primary care: feasibility, acceptability, and intervention fidelity.虚拟实践促进作为启动初级保健中阿片类药物安全委员会以改善质量的实施策略:可行性、可接受性和干预保真度。
BMC Prim Care. 2024 Oct 26;25(1):384. doi: 10.1186/s12875-024-02632-w.
9
Effectiveness of colonoscopy, immune fecal occult blood testing, and risk-graded screening strategies in colorectal cancer screening.结肠镜检查、免疫粪便潜血检测及风险分级筛查策略在结直肠癌筛查中的有效性。
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Jul 27;16(7):2270-2280. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i7.2270.
10
Prediction and analysis of albumin-bilirubin score combined with liver function index and carcinoembryonic antigen on liver metastasis of colorectal cancer.白蛋白-胆红素评分联合肝功能指标及癌胚抗原对结直肠癌肝转移的预测与分析
World J Gastrointest Surg. 2024 Jun 27;16(6):1670-1680. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v16.i6.1670.
邮件式粪便免疫化学检测外展可维持结直肠癌筛查率的增加。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Jun;20(6):1326-1333.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.07.022. Epub 2021 Jul 16.
4
Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.结直肠癌筛查:美国预防服务工作组推荐声明。
JAMA. 2021 May 18;325(19):1965-1977. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.6238.
5
Effectiveness and Cost-effectiveness of Mailed FIT in a Safety Net Clinic Population.邮寄粪便免疫化学检测在一个医疗保障人群中的效果和成本效益。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Nov;36(11):3441-3447. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06691-y. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
6
Integration of Improvement and Implementation Science in Practice-Based Research Networks: a Longitudinal, Comparative Case Study.基于实践的研究网络中改进和实施科学的整合:一项纵向、比较案例研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jun;36(6):1503-1513. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06610-1. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
7
Implementation science should give higher priority to health equity.实施科学应该更加重视卫生公平。
Implement Sci. 2021 Mar 19;16(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01097-0.
8
What's the "secret sauce"? How implementation variation affects the success of colorectal cancer screening outreach.“秘诀”是什么?实施差异如何影响结直肠癌筛查推广的成功。
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Jan 11;2(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s43058-020-00104-7.
9
Colorectal Cancer Screening and COVID-19.结直肠癌筛查与2019冠状病毒病
Am J Gastroenterol. 2021 Feb 1;116(2):433-434. doi: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000970.
10
Improvement Science and Implementation Science in Cancer Care: Identifying Areas of Synergy and Opportunities for Further Integration.癌症护理中的改善科学和实施科学:确定协同领域和进一步整合的机会。
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jan;36(1):186-195. doi: 10.1007/s11606-020-06138-w. Epub 2020 Aug 31.