Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Jun;36(6):1503-1513. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06610-1. Epub 2021 Apr 14.
Implementation science (IS) and quality improvement (QI) inhabit distinct areas of scholarly literature, but are often blended in practice. Because practice-based research networks (PBRNs) draw from both traditions, their experience could inform opportunities for strategic IS-QI alignment.
To systematically examine IS, QI, and IS/QI projects conducted within a PBRN over time to identify similarities, differences, and synergies.
Longitudinal, comparative case study of projects conducted in the Oregon Rural Practice-based Research Network (ORPRN) from January 2007 to January 2019.
We reviewed documents and conducted staff interviews. We classified projects as IS, QI, IS/QI, or other using established criteria. We abstracted project details (e.g., objective, setting, theoretical framework) and used qualitative synthesis to compare projects by classification and to identify the contributions of IS and QI within the same project.
Almost 30% (26/99) of ORPRN's projects included IS or QI elements; 54% (14/26) were classified as IS/QI. All 26 projects used an evidence-based intervention and shared many similarities in relation to objective and setting. Over half of the IS and IS/QI projects used randomized designs and theoretical frameworks, while no QI projects did. Projects displayed an upward trend in complexity over time. Project used a similar number of practice change strategies; however, projects classified as IS predominantly employed education/training while all IS/QI and most QI projects used practice facilitation. Projects including IS/QI elements demonstrated the following contributions: QI provides the mechanism by which the principles of IS are operationalized in order to support local practice change and IS in turn provides theories to inform implementation and evaluation to produce generalizable knowledge.
Our review of projects conducted over a 12-year period in one PBRN demonstrates key synergies for IS and QI. Strategic alignment of IS/QI within projects may help improve care quality and bridge the research-practice gap.
实施科学(IS)和质量改进(QI)占据着学术文献的不同领域,但在实践中经常融合在一起。由于实践为基础的研究网络(PBRN)同时借鉴了这两种传统,因此其经验可以为战略 IS-QI 协同提供信息。
系统地检查在 PBRN 中随时间推移进行的 IS、QI 和 IS/QI 项目,以确定它们之间的相似点、差异和协同作用。
对 2007 年 1 月至 2019 年 1 月在俄勒冈农村实践为基础的研究网络(ORPRN)中进行的项目进行的纵向、比较案例研究。
我们审查了文件并进行了员工访谈。我们使用既定标准将项目分类为 IS、QI、IS/QI 或其他。我们提取了项目详细信息(例如,目标、背景、理论框架),并使用定性综合比较了按分类的项目,并确定了同一项目中 IS 和 QI 的贡献。
ORPRN 的项目中约有 30%(26/99)包含 IS 或 QI 元素;54%(14/26)被归类为 IS/QI。所有 26 个项目都使用了基于证据的干预措施,并且在目标和背景方面有许多相似之处。超过一半的 IS 和 IS/QI 项目使用了随机设计和理论框架,而没有 QI 项目。项目随时间呈现出复杂性的上升趋势。项目使用了类似数量的实践改变策略;然而,被归类为 IS 的项目主要采用教育/培训,而所有的 IS/QI 和大多数 QI 项目都采用实践促进。包含 IS/QI 元素的项目展示了以下贡献:QI 提供了将 IS 原则付诸实践的机制,以支持当地的实践变革,而 IS 反过来提供了理论,以告知实施和评估,从而产生可推广的知识。
我们对一个 PBRN 中进行的为期 12 年的项目进行审查,展示了 IS 和 QI 的关键协同作用。在项目中战略性地协调 IS/QI 可能有助于提高护理质量并缩小研究与实践之间的差距。