• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种用于估计按多基因风险分层的 18 种疾病的特定国家累积发病率的统一框架。

A unified framework for estimating country-specific cumulative incidence for 18 diseases stratified by polygenic risk.

机构信息

Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland, FIMM, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

Estonian Genome Centre, Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.

出版信息

Nat Commun. 2024 Jun 12;15(1):5007. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-48938-2.

DOI:10.1038/s41467-024-48938-2
PMID:38866767
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11169548/
Abstract

Polygenic scores (PGSs) offer the ability to predict genetic risk for complex diseases across the life course; a key benefit over short-term prediction models. To produce risk estimates relevant to clinical and public health decision-making, it is important to account for varying effects due to age and sex. Here, we develop a novel framework to estimate country-, age-, and sex-specific estimates of cumulative incidence stratified by PGS for 18 high-burden diseases. We integrate PGS associations from seven studies in four countries (N = 1,197,129) with disease incidences from the Global Burden of Disease. PGS has a significant sex-specific effect for asthma, hip osteoarthritis, gout, coronary heart disease and type 2 diabetes (T2D), with all but T2D exhibiting a larger effect in men. PGS has a larger effect in younger individuals for 13 diseases, with effects decreasing linearly with age. We show for breast cancer that, relative to individuals in the bottom 20% of polygenic risk, the top 5% attain an absolute risk for screening eligibility 16.3 years earlier. Our framework increases the generalizability of results from biobank studies and the accuracy of absolute risk estimates by appropriately accounting for age- and sex-specific PGS effects. Our results highlight the potential of PGS as a screening tool which may assist in the early prevention of common diseases.

摘要

多基因评分 (PGS) 提供了在整个生命过程中预测复杂疾病遗传风险的能力;这是优于短期预测模型的关键优势。为了产生与临床和公共卫生决策相关的风险估计,重要的是要考虑到由于年龄和性别而产生的不同影响。在这里,我们开发了一种新的框架,用于估计 18 种高负担疾病的累积发病率的国家、年龄和性别特异性估计值,并对其进行 PGS 分层。我们将来自四个国家的七项研究中的 PGS 关联(N=1,197,129)与全球疾病负担中的疾病发生率相结合。PGS 对哮喘、髋骨关节炎、痛风、冠心病和 2 型糖尿病(T2D)具有显著的性别特异性影响,但除 T2D 外,男性的影响更大。PGS 对 13 种疾病在年轻个体中的影响更大,随着年龄的增长,影响呈线性下降。我们以乳腺癌为例,与处于多基因风险最低 20%的个体相比,最高 5%的个体获得筛查资格的绝对风险提前了 16.3 年。我们的框架通过适当考虑年龄和性别特异性 PGS 效应,提高了生物库研究结果的通用性和绝对风险估计的准确性。我们的研究结果突出了 PGS 作为一种筛查工具的潜力,它可能有助于早期预防常见疾病。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcdd/11169548/5397eeb535c1/41467_2024_48938_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcdd/11169548/99d5059f8792/41467_2024_48938_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcdd/11169548/05825352d37a/41467_2024_48938_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcdd/11169548/1c7cb9896c64/41467_2024_48938_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcdd/11169548/5397eeb535c1/41467_2024_48938_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcdd/11169548/99d5059f8792/41467_2024_48938_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcdd/11169548/05825352d37a/41467_2024_48938_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcdd/11169548/1c7cb9896c64/41467_2024_48938_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fcdd/11169548/5397eeb535c1/41467_2024_48938_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A unified framework for estimating country-specific cumulative incidence for 18 diseases stratified by polygenic risk.一种用于估计按多基因风险分层的 18 种疾病的特定国家累积发病率的统一框架。
Nat Commun. 2024 Jun 12;15(1):5007. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-48938-2.
2
Polygenic scores for longitudinal prediction of incident type 2 diabetes in an ancestrally and medically diverse primary care physician network: a patient cohort study.在一个具有不同种族和医学背景的初级保健医生网络中,用于纵向预测2型糖尿病发病的多基因评分:一项患者队列研究。
Genome Med. 2024 Apr 26;16(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13073-024-01337-0.
3
Polygenic and clinical risk scores and their impact on age at onset and prediction of cardiometabolic diseases and common cancers.多基因和临床风险评分及其对发病年龄和心血管代谢疾病及常见癌症预测的影响。
Nat Med. 2020 Apr;26(4):549-557. doi: 10.1038/s41591-020-0800-0. Epub 2020 Apr 7.
4
Lipidomic risk scores are independent of polygenic risk scores and can predict incidence of diabetes and cardiovascular disease in a large population cohort.脂质组学风险评分独立于多基因风险评分,可以预测大型人群队列中糖尿病和心血管疾病的发病风险。
PLoS Biol. 2022 Mar 3;20(3):e3001561. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001561. eCollection 2022 Mar.
5
Polygenic risk scores for the prediction of common cancers in East Asians: A population-based prospective cohort study.基于人群的前瞻性队列研究:东亚常见癌症的多基因风险评分预测。
Elife. 2023 Mar 27;12:e82608. doi: 10.7554/eLife.82608.
6
Evaluating the Efficacy of Type 2 Diabetes Polygenic Risk Scores in an Independent European Population.评估 2 型糖尿病多基因风险评分在独立欧洲人群中的疗效。
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jan 17;25(2):1151. doi: 10.3390/ijms25021151.
7
Genomic Prediction of 16 Complex Disease Risks Including Heart Attack, Diabetes, Breast and Prostate Cancer.16 种复杂疾病风险的基因组预测,包括心脏病发作、糖尿病、乳腺癌和前列腺癌。
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 25;9(1):15286. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51258-x.
8
AI-enhanced integration of genetic and medical imaging data for risk assessment of Type 2 diabetes.人工智能增强遗传与医学影像数据融合用于 2 型糖尿病风险评估。
Nat Commun. 2024 May 18;15(1):4230. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-48618-1.
9
Shared exposure liability of type 2 diabetes and other chronic conditions in the UK Biobank.英国生物库中 2 型糖尿病和其他慢性病的共同暴露责任。
Acta Diabetol. 2022 Jun;59(6):851-860. doi: 10.1007/s00592-022-01864-5. Epub 2022 Mar 29.
10
Development of genome-wide polygenic risk scores for lipid traits and clinical applications for dyslipidemia, subclinical atherosclerosis, and diabetes cardiovascular complications among East Asians.东亚人群脂质特征、血脂异常、亚临床动脉粥样硬化、糖尿病心血管并发症的全基因组多基因风险评分的开发及临床应用。
Genome Med. 2021 Feb 19;13(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s13073-021-00831-z.

引用本文的文献

1
The impact of polygenic score and socioeconomic status in predicting risk for 19 complex diseases.多基因评分和社会经济地位对预测19种复杂疾病风险的影响。
medRxiv. 2025 Sep 4:2025.09.02.25334913. doi: 10.1101/2025.09.02.25334913.
2
Cross-biobank generalizability and accuracy of electronic health record-based predictors compared to polygenic scores.与多基因评分相比,基于电子健康记录的预测指标在跨生物样本库中的通用性和准确性。
Nat Genet. 2025 Aug 27. doi: 10.1038/s41588-025-02298-9.
3
Polygenic Score Complements Family History and Lynch Syndrome Genes for Predicting Colorectal Cancer Risk.

本文引用的文献

1
Amplification is the primary mode of gene-by-sex interaction in complex human traits.在复杂的人类性状中,基因与性别的相互作用主要模式是基因扩增。
Cell Genom. 2023 Apr 6;3(5):100297. doi: 10.1016/j.xgen.2023.100297. eCollection 2023 May 10.
2
Impact of selection bias on polygenic risk score estimates in healthcare settings.选择偏倚对医疗环境中多基因风险评分估计值的影响。
Psychol Med. 2023 Nov;53(15):7435-7445. doi: 10.1017/S0033291723001186. Epub 2023 May 25.
3
Quality control and analytic best practices for testing genetic models of sex differences in large populations.
多基因评分补充家族史和林奇综合征基因以预测结直肠癌风险。
JCO Precis Oncol. 2025 Jul;9:e2500081. doi: 10.1200/PO-25-00081. Epub 2025 Jul 2.
4
Genomic risk prediction for type 2 diabetes in Australian individuals aged 70 years and older.澳大利亚70岁及以上人群2型糖尿病的基因组风险预测。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 Sep;27(9):5259-5268. doi: 10.1111/dom.16579. Epub 2025 Jul 2.
5
Incorporating genetic data improves target trial emulations and informs the use of polygenic scores in randomized controlled trial design.纳入基因数据可改善目标试验模拟,并为随机对照试验设计中多基因评分的使用提供信息。
Nat Genet. 2025 Jun 18. doi: 10.1038/s41588-025-02229-8.
6
Perceived risk of type 2 diabetes: Using linked genomic, clinical and questionnaire data to understand the potential use of genetic risk tools in British South Asians.2型糖尿病的感知风险:利用关联的基因组、临床和问卷调查数据来了解基因风险工具在英国南亚人群中的潜在用途。
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Mar 31;5(3):e0004274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004274. eCollection 2025.
7
Dual exposure-by-polygenic score interactions highlight disparities across social groups in the proportion needed to benefit.通过多基因评分的双重暴露相互作用凸显了不同社会群体在受益所需比例方面的差异。
medRxiv. 2024 Jul 30:2024.07.29.24311065. doi: 10.1101/2024.07.29.24311065.
8
Polygenic risk scores as a marker for epilepsy risk across lifetime and after unspecified seizure events.多基因风险评分作为一生中及不明原因癫痫发作后癫痫风险的标志物。
Nat Commun. 2024 Jul 25;15(1):6277. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-50295-z.
9
Evaluation of polygenic scoring methods in five biobanks shows larger variation between biobanks than methods and finds benefits of ensemble learning.五项生物库中多基因评分方法的评估显示,生物库之间的差异大于方法之间的差异,并发现了集成学习的益处。
Am J Hum Genet. 2024 Jul 11;111(7):1431-1447. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.06.003. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
10
Screening embryos for polygenic disease risk: a review of epidemiological, clinical, and ethical considerations.胚胎多基因疾病风险筛查:流行病学、临床和伦理考虑的综述。
Hum Reprod Update. 2024 Oct 1;30(5):529-557. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmae012.
大规模人群中性别差异遗传模型检测的质量控制和分析最佳实践。
Cell. 2023 May 11;186(10):2044-2061. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.04.014.
4
The Urgent Need to Refocus Cardiovascular Disease Prevention Efforts on Young Adults.迫切需要将心血管疾病预防工作的重点重新放在年轻人身上。
JAMA. 2023 Mar 21;329(11):886-887. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.2308.
5
Realistic expectations are key to realising the benefits of polygenic scores.现实的期望是实现多基因评分益处的关键。
BMJ. 2023 Feb 28;380:e073149. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-073149.
6
The HUNT study: A population-based cohort for genetic research.HUNT研究:一项基于人群的基因研究队列。
Cell Genom. 2022 Oct 12;2(10):100193. doi: 10.1016/j.xgen.2022.100193.
7
Global Biobank analyses provide lessons for developing polygenic risk scores across diverse cohorts.全球生物样本库分析为在不同队列中开发多基因风险评分提供了经验教训。
Cell Genom. 2023 Jan 4;3(1):100241. doi: 10.1016/j.xgen.2022.100241. eCollection 2023 Jan 11.
8
FinnGen provides genetic insights from a well-phenotyped isolated population.FinnGen 为一个表型良好的隔离人群提供了遗传学方面的见解。
Nature. 2023 Jan;613(7944):508-518. doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-05473-8. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
9
Prioritizing the detection of rare pathogenic variants in population screening.在人群筛查中优先检测罕见致病变异。
Nat Rev Genet. 2023 Apr;24(4):205-206. doi: 10.1038/s41576-022-00571-9.
10
Discovery and systematic characterization of risk variants and genes for coronary artery disease in over a million participants.在超过 100 万名参与者中发现并系统地描述了冠心病的风险变异和基因。
Nat Genet. 2022 Dec;54(12):1803-1815. doi: 10.1038/s41588-022-01233-6. Epub 2022 Dec 6.