Suppr超能文献

荷兰头皮冷却注册研究 7424 例患者的结果:头皮冷却效果的决定因素分析。

Results of the Dutch scalp cooling registry in 7424 patients: analysis of determinants for scalp cooling efficacy.

机构信息

Department of Biological Sciences, School of Applied Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Huddersfield, United Kingdom.

Research and Development Department, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Oncologist. 2024 Oct 3;29(10):e1386-e1395. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyae116.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy-induced alopecia is a common consequence of cancer treatment with a high psychological impact on patients and can be prevented by scalp cooling (SC). With this multi-center patient series, we examined the results for multiple currently used chemotherapy regimens to offer an audit into the real-world determinants of SC efficacy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The Dutch Scalp Cooling Registry collected data on 7424 scalp-cooled patients in 68 Dutch hospitals. Nurses and patients completed questionnaires on patient characteristics, chemotherapy, and SC protocol. Patient-reported primary outcomes at the start of the final SC session included head cover (HC) (eg, wig/scarf) use (yes/no) as a surrogate for patient satisfaction with SC and WHO score for alopecia (0 = no hair loss up to 3 = total alopecia) as a measure of scalp cooling success. Exhaustive logistic regression analysis stratified by chemotherapy regimen was implemented to examine characteristics and interactions associated with the SC result.

RESULTS

Overall, over half of patients (n = 4191, 56%) did not wear a HC and 53% (n = 3784/7183) reported minimal hair loss (WHO score 0/1) at the start of their final treatment. Outcomes were drug and dose dependent. Besides the chemotherapy regimen, this study did not identify any patient characteristic or lifestyle factor as a generic determinant influencing SC success. For non-gender specific cancers, gender played no statistically significant role in HC use nor WHO score.

CONCLUSIONS

Scalp cooling is effective for the majority of patients. The robust model for evaluating the drug and dose-specific determinants of SC efficacy revealed no indications for changes in daily practice, suggesting factors currently being overlooked. As no correlation was identified between the determinants explaining HC use and WHO score outcomes, new methods for evaluation are warranted.

摘要

背景

化疗引起的脱发是癌症治疗的常见后果,对患者有很大的心理影响,可以通过头皮冷却(SC)来预防。通过这项多中心患者系列研究,我们检查了多种目前使用的化疗方案的结果,为 SC 疗效的实际决定因素提供了一次审计。

材料和方法

荷兰头皮冷却登记处收集了 68 家荷兰医院的 7424 名头皮冷却患者的数据。护士和患者完成了关于患者特征、化疗和 SC 方案的问卷。在最后一次 SC 疗程开始时,患者报告的主要结局包括头部覆盖物(HC)(例如,假发/头巾)的使用(是/否),作为对 SC 满意度的替代指标,以及脱发的世界卫生组织评分(0=无脱发,3=完全脱发),作为头皮冷却成功的衡量标准。实施了详尽的逻辑回归分析,按化疗方案分层,以检查与 SC 结果相关的特征和相互作用。

结果

总体而言,超过一半的患者(n=4191,56%)不戴 HC,53%(n=3784/7183)在最后一次治疗开始时报告头发几乎没有脱落(WHO 评分 0/1)。结果与药物和剂量有关。除了化疗方案外,本研究没有发现任何患者特征或生活方式因素是影响 SC 成功的通用决定因素。对于非性别特异性癌症,性别在 HC 使用或 WHO 评分方面没有统计学意义。

结论

头皮冷却对大多数患者有效。评估 SC 疗效的药物和剂量特异性决定因素的稳健模型没有显示出改变日常实践的迹象,这表明目前被忽视的因素。由于确定 HC 使用和 WHO 评分结果的决定因素之间没有相关性,因此需要新的评估方法。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验