Royal Netherlands Navy Diving and Submarine Medical Center, Den Helder, the Netherlands.
Corresponding author: Dr Thijs Wingelaar, Royal Netherlands Navy Diving and Submarine Medical Center, Rijkszee and Marinehaven, 1780 CA Den Helder, the Netherlands, ORCiD: 0000-0001-7740-7392,
Diving Hyperb Med. 2024 Jun 30;54(2):105-109. doi: 10.28920/dhm54.2.105-109.
Routine dipstick urinalysis is part of many dive medical assessment protocols. However, this has a significant chance of producing false-positive or false-negative results in asymptomatic and healthy individuals. Studies evaluating the value of urinalysis in dive medical assessments are limited.
All results from urinalysis as part of dive medical assessments of divers, submarines, and hyperbaric personnel of the Royal Netherlands Navy from 2013 to 2023 were included in this study. Additionally, any information regarding additional testing, referral, or test results concerning the aforementioned was collected.
There were 5,899 assessments, resulting in 46 (0.8%) positive dipstick urinalysis results, predominantly microscopic haematuria. Females were significantly overrepresented, and revisions resulted in significantly more positive test results than initial assessments. Lastly, almost half of the cases were deemed fit to dive, while the other half were regarded as temporarily unfit. These cases required additional testing, and a urologist was consulted three times.
To our knowledge, this is the most extensive study evaluating urinalysis in dive medical assessments. In our military population, the incidence of positive test results is very low, and there have not been clinically relevant results over a period of 10 years. Therefore, routinely assessing urine in asymptomatic healthy military candidates is not cost-effective or efficacious. The authors advise taking a thorough history for fitness to dive assessments and only analysing urine when a clinical indication is present.
常规尿试纸分析是许多潜水医学评估方案的一部分。然而,在无症状和健康个体中,这会有很大的机会产生假阳性或假阴性结果。评估尿分析在潜水医学评估中的价值的研究是有限的。
本研究纳入了 2013 年至 2023 年期间荷兰皇家海军潜水员、潜艇和高压舱人员潜水医学评估中尿分析的所有结果。此外,还收集了任何关于上述人员的额外测试、转介或测试结果的信息。
共有 5899 次评估,导致 46 次(0.8%)尿试纸分析结果阳性,主要为显微镜血尿。女性的比例明显偏高,修订后的测试结果阳性率明显高于初始评估。最后,近一半的病例被认为适合潜水,而另一半则被认为暂时不适合。这些病例需要额外的测试,并且三次咨询了泌尿科医生。
据我们所知,这是评估潜水医学评估中尿分析的最广泛研究。在我们的军事人群中,阳性测试结果的发生率非常低,并且在 10 年期间没有出现临床相关结果。因此,对无症状健康军人候选者进行常规尿液检查既不具有成本效益,也没有效果。作者建议对潜水适应性评估进行全面的病史评估,仅在出现临床指征时分析尿液。