• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估全髋关节或全膝关节置换术后手术部位感染半自动监测的多方面实施策略:荷兰多中心试点研究。

Evaluation of a multifaceted implementation strategy for semi-automated surveillance of surgical site infections after total hip or knee arthroplasty: a multicentre pilot study in the Netherlands.

机构信息

Centre for Infectious Diseases Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.

Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Control, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2024 Jun 13;13(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13756-024-01418-0.

DOI:10.1186/s13756-024-01418-0
PMID:38872201
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11170835/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

To promote the nation-wide implementation of semi-automated surveillance (AS) of surgical site infection after hip and knee arthroplasty, the Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) deployed a decentralised multifaceted implementation strategy. This strategy consisted of a protocol specifying minimum requirements for an AS system, supported by a user manual, education module, individual guidance for hospitals and user-group meetings. This study describes an effect evaluation and process evaluation of the implementation strategy for AS in five frontrunner hospitals.

METHODS

To evaluate the effect of the implementation strategy, the achieved phase of implementation was determined in each frontrunner hospital at the end of the study period. The process evaluation consisted of (1) an evaluation of the feasibility of strategy elements, (2) an evaluation of barriers and facilitators for implementation and (3) an evaluation of the workload for implementation. Interviews were performed as a basis for a subsequent survey quantifying the results regarding the feasibility as well as barriers and facilitators. Workload was self-monitored per profession. Qualitative data were analysed using a framework analysis, whereas quantitative data were analysed descriptively.

RESULTS

One hospital finished the complete implementation process in 240 person-hours. Overall, the elements of the implementation strategy were often used, positively received and overall, the strategy was rated effective and feasible. During the implementation process, participants perceived the relative advantage of AS and had sufficient knowledge about AS. However, barriers regarding complexity of AS data extraction, data-infrastructure, and validation, lack of capacity and motivation at the IT department, and difficulties with assigning roles and responsibilities were experienced.

CONCLUSION

A decentralised multifaceted implementation strategy is suitable for the implementation of AS in hospitals. Effective local project management, including clear project leadership and ownership, obtaining commitment of higher management levels, active involvement of stakeholders, and appropriate allocation of roles and responsibilities is important for successful implementation and should be facilitated by the implementation strategy. Sufficient knowledge about AS, its requirements and the implementation process should be available among stakeholders by e.g. an education module. Furthermore, exchange of knowledge and experiences between hospitals should be encouraged in user-group meetings.

摘要

简介

为了在全国范围内推广髋关节和膝关节置换术后手术部位感染的半自动监测(AS),荷兰国家公共卫生和环境研究所(RIVM)部署了一种分散的多方面实施策略。该策略包括规定 AS 系统最低要求的协议,辅以用户手册、教育模块、针对医院的个别指导和用户组会议。本研究描述了在五家前沿医院实施 AS 实施策略的效果评估和过程评估。

方法

为了评估实施策略的效果,在研究结束时确定了每个前沿医院的实施阶段。过程评估包括(1)评估策略要素的可行性,(2)评估实施的障碍和促进因素,(3)评估实施的工作量。访谈是作为随后调查的基础,对可行性以及障碍和促进因素进行量化评估。工作量由每个专业人员自行监测。定性数据采用框架分析进行分析,而定量数据采用描述性分析。

结果

一家医院在 240 个人工时内完成了整个实施过程。总体而言,实施策略的要素经常被使用,受到积极评价,总体而言,该策略被评为有效且可行。在实施过程中,参与者感知到 AS 的相对优势,并且对 AS 有足够的了解。然而,在 AS 数据提取的复杂性、数据基础设施、验证、IT 部门的能力和动力不足以及角色和职责分配困难方面遇到了障碍。

结论

分散的多方面实施策略适合在医院实施 AS。有效的本地项目管理,包括明确的项目领导和所有权、获得更高管理层的承诺、利益相关者的积极参与以及适当分配角色和职责,对于成功实施非常重要,并且应该由实施策略来促进。利益相关者应该具备有关 AS、其要求和实施过程的足够知识,例如通过教育模块。此外,应该在用户组会议上鼓励医院之间的知识和经验交流。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab3e/11170835/2bbea62e4431/13756_2024_1418_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab3e/11170835/50c6862b71d1/13756_2024_1418_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab3e/11170835/619e6fe2a4b5/13756_2024_1418_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab3e/11170835/ab886d769da3/13756_2024_1418_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab3e/11170835/51a1b3c088b3/13756_2024_1418_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab3e/11170835/2bbea62e4431/13756_2024_1418_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab3e/11170835/50c6862b71d1/13756_2024_1418_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab3e/11170835/619e6fe2a4b5/13756_2024_1418_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab3e/11170835/ab886d769da3/13756_2024_1418_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab3e/11170835/51a1b3c088b3/13756_2024_1418_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ab3e/11170835/2bbea62e4431/13756_2024_1418_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a multifaceted implementation strategy for semi-automated surveillance of surgical site infections after total hip or knee arthroplasty: a multicentre pilot study in the Netherlands.评估全髋关节或全膝关节置换术后手术部位感染半自动监测的多方面实施策略:荷兰多中心试点研究。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2024 Jun 13;13(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s13756-024-01418-0.
2
De-implementation of expensive blood saving measures in hip and knee arthroplasties: study protocol for the LISBOA-II cluster randomized trial.昂贵的血液节约措施在髋关节和膝关节置换术中的去实施:LISBOA-II 集群随机试验的研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2014 Apr 23;9:48. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-9-48.
3
Snakes and ladders: the barriers and facilitators of elective hip- and knee-replacement surgery in Australian public hospitals.蛇梯棋:澳大利亚公立医院择期髋关节和膝关节置换手术的障碍与促进因素
Aust Health Rev. 2013 May;37(2):166-71. doi: 10.1071/AH12177.
4
The effectiveness of a de-implementation strategy to reduce low-value blood management techniques in primary hip and knee arthroplasty: a pragmatic cluster-randomized controlled trial.一项关于减少初次髋关节和膝关节置换术中低价值血液管理技术的去实施策略的有效性:一项实用的整群随机对照试验。
Implement Sci. 2017 May 30;12(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s13012-017-0601-0.
5
Why do some people with osteoarthritis and obesity awaiting hip or knee arthroplasty achieve successful weight management? A qualitative study.为什么一些患有骨关节炎和肥胖症、等待髋关节或膝关节置换术的人能够成功地进行体重管理?一项定性研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2023 Oct;32(19-20):7543-7559. doi: 10.1111/jocn.16841. Epub 2023 Aug 15.
6
Risk of surgical site infections following hip and knee arthroplasty: results of the ISChIA-GISIO study.髋关节和膝关节置换术后手术部位感染的风险:ISChIA - GISIO研究结果
Ann Ig. 2017 Sep-Oct;29(5):422-430. doi: 10.7416/ai.2017.2174.
7
Validation of an algorithm for semiautomated surveillance to detect deep surgical site infections after primary total hip or knee arthroplasty-A multicenter study.一种用于检测初次全髋关节或全膝关节置换术后深部手术部位感染的半自动监测算法的验证:一项多中心研究。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2021 Jan;42(1):69-74. doi: 10.1017/ice.2020.377. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
8
Designing a strategy to implement cost-effective blood transfusion management in elective hip and knee arthroplasties: a study protocol.设计一种策略,以实施髋关节和膝关节置换术择期手术中具有成本效益的输血管理:研究方案。
Implement Sci. 2012 Jun 30;7:58. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-7-58.
9
The Consumer Quality Index Hip Knee Questionnaire measuring patients' experiences with quality of care after a total hip or knee arthroplasty.消费者质量指数髋关节膝关节问卷用于衡量全髋关节或膝关节置换术后患者对护理质量的体验。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Apr 26;7:60. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-7-60.
10
Epidemiology of surgical site infections after total hip and knee joint replacement during 2007-2009: a report from the VINCat Program.2007-2009 年全髋关节和膝关节置换术后手术部位感染的流行病学:来自 VINCat 项目的报告。
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2012 Jun;30 Suppl 3:26-32. doi: 10.1016/S0213-005X(12)70093-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Automated surveillance for surgical site infections (SSI) in hospitals and surveillance networks-expert perspectives for implementation.医院及监测网络中手术部位感染(SSI)的自动监测——实施的专家观点
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2024 Dec 23;13(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s13756-024-01505-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Barriers and facilitators for surgical site infection surveillance for adult cardiac surgery in a high-income setting: an in-depth exploration.高收入环境下成人心脏手术部位感染监测的障碍和促进因素:深入探讨。
J Hosp Infect. 2023 Nov;141:112-118. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2023.08.023. Epub 2023 Sep 20.
2
Examining barriers to implementing a surgical-site infection bundle.检查实施手术部位感染综合管理包的障碍。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2024 Jan;45(1):13-20. doi: 10.1017/ice.2023.114. Epub 2023 Jul 26.
3
The updated Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research based on user feedback.
基于用户反馈的更新的实施研究综合框架。
Implement Sci. 2022 Oct 29;17(1):75. doi: 10.1186/s13012-022-01245-0.
4
Conceptualizing outcomes for use with the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR): the CFIR Outcomes Addendum.概念化与实施研究整合框架(CFIR)一起使用的结果:CFIR 结果附录。
Implement Sci. 2022 Jan 22;17(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s13012-021-01181-5.
5
PRAISE: providing a roadmap for automated infection surveillance in Europe.赞扬:为欧洲的自动感染监测提供了路线图。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2021 Jul;27 Suppl 1:S3-S19. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2021.02.028.
6
Pragmatic approaches to analyzing qualitative data for implementation science: an introduction.用于实施科学的定性数据分析实用方法:引言
Implement Sci Commun. 2021 Jun 29;2(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s43058-021-00174-1.
7
A Consensus-Based Checklist for Reporting of Survey Studies (CROSS).基于共识的调查研究报告清单(CROSS)
J Gen Intern Med. 2021 Oct;36(10):3179-3187. doi: 10.1007/s11606-021-06737-1. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
8
Validation of an algorithm for semiautomated surveillance to detect deep surgical site infections after primary total hip or knee arthroplasty-A multicenter study.一种用于检测初次全髋关节或全膝关节置换术后深部手术部位感染的半自动监测算法的验证:一项多中心研究。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2021 Jan;42(1):69-74. doi: 10.1017/ice.2020.377. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
9
Choosing implementation strategies to address contextual barriers: diversity in recommendations and future directions.选择实施策略以解决背景障碍:建议的多样性和未来方向。
Implement Sci. 2019 Apr 29;14(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13012-019-0892-4.
10
RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review.RE-AIM规划与评估框架:历经20年回顾,适应新科学与实践
Front Public Health. 2019 Mar 29;7:64. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2019.00064. eCollection 2019.