Essén Birgitta, Wickramasinghe Ayanthi, Eriksson Lise, Vartanova Irina, Tibajev Andrey, Strimling Pontus
Department of Women's and Children's Health, Faculty of Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Faculty of Social Sciences, Business and Economics, and Law, Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland.
Front Sociol. 2024 May 30;9:1356418. doi: 10.3389/fsoc.2024.1356418. eCollection 2024.
Despite the commitment of the Swedish government to ensuring equal access to Sexual Reproductive Health and Rights services for all citizens, shortcomings persist among the migrant population. In cases where healthcare providers lack sufficient knowledge or hold misconceptions and biases about these contentious issues, it can lead to the delivery of suboptimal care. Therefore, the objective of this study was to assess the level of knowledge of Swedish healthcare providers on global and Swedish migrant Sexual Reproductive Health and Rights.
A national cross-sectional study was conducted using a questionnaire consisting of seven questions related to global and Swedish migrant Sexual Reproductive Health and Rights. The questionnaire was distributed among midwives, nurses, gynecologists and obstetricians, and hospital social workers ( = 731). The analysis was guided by the Factfulness framework developed by Hans Rosling to identify disparities between healthcare providers' viewpoints and evidence-based knowledge.
There was an overall lack of knowledge among the health care providers on these issues. The highest correct responses were on the question on abandonment of female genital cutting/mutilation after migration (74%). The findings indicated that healthcare providers originating from Sweden, physicians, those with fewer years of clinical experience, and exhibiting more migrant-friendly attitudes, demonstrated a higher level of knowledge regarding global and Swedish migrant Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights.
This study demonstrates that healthcare providers lacked knowledge of global and Swedish migrant Sexual Reproductive Health and Rights, which was almost uniformly distributed, except among those with more comprehensive and recent education. Contrary to expectations, healthcare professionals did not primarily rely on their education and experiences but were influenced by their personal values and opinions. The study underscores the importance of upgrading knowledge in Sexual Reproductive Health and Rights and encourages policymakers, professionals, and students to base their opinions on well-founded facts, particularly in the context of a diverse and globalized society.
尽管瑞典政府致力于确保所有公民都能平等获得性健康和生殖健康及权利服务,但移民群体中仍存在不足。在医疗服务提供者对这些有争议的问题缺乏足够知识或持有误解与偏见的情况下,可能会导致提供的护理不够理想。因此,本研究的目的是评估瑞典医疗服务提供者对全球及瑞典移民性健康和生殖健康及权利的了解程度。
开展了一项全国性横断面研究,使用一份包含七个与全球及瑞典移民性健康和生殖健康及权利相关问题的问卷。该问卷分发给了助产士、护士、妇科医生和产科医生以及医院社会工作者(共731人)。分析以汉斯·罗斯林开发的实事求是框架为指导,以确定医疗服务提供者的观点与循证知识之间的差异。
医疗服务提供者总体上对这些问题缺乏了解。正确回答率最高的问题是关于移民后放弃女性生殖器切割/ mutilation(74%)。研究结果表明,来自瑞典的医疗服务提供者、医生、临床经验较少且表现出更友好的移民态度的人,对全球及瑞典移民性健康和生殖健康及权利的了解程度更高。
本研究表明,医疗服务提供者缺乏对全球及瑞典移民性健康和生殖健康及权利的了解,这种情况几乎是普遍存在的,除了那些接受过更全面和最新教育的人。与预期相反,医疗专业人员并非主要依赖他们的教育和经验,而是受到个人价值观和观点的影响。该研究强调了提升性健康和生殖健康及权利知识的重要性,并鼓励政策制定者、专业人员和学生基于有充分依据的事实形成观点,特别是在多元化和全球化社会的背景下。