• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

适用于 7-11 岁儿童的自测医疗结局概况量表(MYMOP)的改编和内容验证。

Adaptation and content validation of measure yourself medical outcomes profile (MYMOP) for 7-11 year-old children.

机构信息

School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2024 Sep;33(9):2401-2416. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03702-3. Epub 2024 Jun 14.

DOI:10.1007/s11136-024-03702-3
PMID:38874698
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11390820/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile (MYMOP) is an individualised tool designed for adults but used with children without any evidence of validation in this population. Individualised instruments are patient-specific rather than disease-specific and therefore can be applied across various health conditions. This study sought to adapt, and content validate the MYMOP for application in 7-11 year old children.

METHODS

There were two main phases of the four iterations: expert consultation (three rounds) and interviews with child-parent pairs at the Outpatient clinics of a Children's Hospital. Thematic analysis was undertaken using an inductive, interpretative approach.

RESULTS

Four paediatricians completed the first survey, five paediatricians participated in the focus group, and four paediatric health-related quality of life (HRQOL) research experts completed the second survey. Several changes were recommended to the MYMOP by the expert groups. Twenty-five children (17 general medicine, and 8 diabetes/endocrine clinic) aged 7-11 years completed the draft paediatric MYMOP (P-MYMOP) and were interviewed. Results demonstrated that the majority of participants were able to identify their own problems and activity limitations, and all participants understood the 7-point faces scale. Most parents and children perceived that the P-MYMOP would be useful to complete before clinic appointments.

CONCLUSIONS

The P-MYMOP is the first content-validated generic individualised HRQOL measure for children 7-11 years old. Given that validation is an iterative process, further research to assess its feasibility, reliability, and construct validity is required.

摘要

背景

Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile(MYMOP)是一种个体化工具,专为成年人设计,但在该人群中未经验证就用于儿童。个体化工具是针对患者的,而不是针对疾病的,因此可以应用于各种健康状况。本研究旨在对 MYMOP 进行改编和内容验证,以适用于 7-11 岁儿童。

方法

在四个迭代过程中有两个主要阶段:专家咨询(三轮)和在儿童医院门诊对儿童-家长对进行访谈。采用归纳、解释性方法进行主题分析。

结果

四名儿科医生完成了第一份调查,五名儿科医生参加了焦点小组,四名儿科健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)研究专家完成了第二份调查。专家小组建议对 MYMOP 进行了一些修改。25 名 7-11 岁的儿童(17 名普通医学,8 名糖尿病/内分泌诊所)完成了草稿儿科 MYMOP(P-MYMOP)并接受了访谈。结果表明,大多数参与者能够识别自己的问题和活动限制,所有参与者都理解 7 点脸谱量表。大多数家长和孩子认为在就诊前完成 P-MYMOP 将很有用。

结论

P-MYMOP 是第一个针对 7-11 岁儿童的内容验证的通用个体化 HRQOL 测量工具。鉴于验证是一个迭代过程,需要进一步研究来评估其可行性、可靠性和结构有效性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cc0/11390820/f100771153da/11136_2024_3702_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cc0/11390820/23c3b2d23697/11136_2024_3702_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cc0/11390820/f100771153da/11136_2024_3702_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cc0/11390820/23c3b2d23697/11136_2024_3702_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3cc0/11390820/f100771153da/11136_2024_3702_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Adaptation and content validation of measure yourself medical outcomes profile (MYMOP) for 7-11 year-old children.适用于 7-11 岁儿童的自测医疗结局概况量表(MYMOP)的改编和内容验证。
Qual Life Res. 2024 Sep;33(9):2401-2416. doi: 10.1007/s11136-024-03702-3. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
2
In pursuit of patient-centred outcomes: a qualitative evaluation of the 'Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile'.追求以患者为中心的结果:对“自我测量医疗结果概况”的定性评估。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2000 Jan;5(1):27-36. doi: 10.1177/135581960000500108.
3
A brief patient-reported outcome instrument for primary care: German translation and validation of the Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile (MYMOP).一种用于初级保健的简短患者报告结局工具:《自我测量医疗结局概况》(MYMOP)的德语翻译与验证
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Jul 19;12(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12955-014-0112-5.
4
Individualized health-related quality of life instrument Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile (MYMOP) and its adaptations: a critical appraisal.个体化健康相关生活质量工具 Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile (MYMOP) 及其改编版:批判性评价。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Apr;28(4):879-893. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-2046-6. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
5
An intervention to improve the quality of life in children of parents with serious mental illness: the Young SMILES feasibility RCT.改善严重精神疾病父母子女生活质量的干预措施:Young SMILES 可行性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(59):1-136. doi: 10.3310/hta24590.
6
Parent proxy-report of their children's health-related quality of life: an analysis of 13,878 parents' reliability and validity across age subgroups using the PedsQL 4.0 Generic Core Scales.父母对其子女健康相关生活质量的代理报告:使用儿童生活质量量表4.0通用核心量表对13878名父母在不同年龄亚组中的信度和效度进行分析。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Jan 3;5:2. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-2.
7
Patient understanding of two commonly used patient reported outcome measures for primary care: a cognitive interview study.患者对两种常用于初级保健的患者报告结局指标的理解:一项认知访谈研究
BMC Fam Pract. 2018 Sep 27;19(1):162. doi: 10.1186/s12875-018-0850-2.
8
Using Chinese version of MYMOP in Chinese medicine evaluation: validity, responsiveness and minimally important change.采用中文版明尼苏达多相人格测验评估中医:效度、反应度和最小重要变化。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2010 Sep 30;8:111. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-8-111.
9
Measuring outcomes in primary care: a patient generated measure, MYMOP, compared with the SF-36 health survey.基层医疗中的结果测量:一种患者生成的测量方法——MYMOP与SF-36健康调查的比较
BMJ. 1996 Apr 20;312(7037):1016-20. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7037.1016.
10
Parent experiences of diabetes care questionnaire (PEQ-DC): reliability and validity following a national survey in Norway.父母参与糖尿病管理问卷(PEQ-DC):挪威全国调查后的信度和效度。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Oct 12;18(1):774. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3591-y.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic Review of Conceptual, Age, Measurement and Valuation Considerations for Generic Multidimensional Childhood Patient-Reported Outcome Measures.系统评价:通用多维儿童患者报告结局测量的概念、年龄、测量和评估考虑因素。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Apr;40(4):379-431. doi: 10.1007/s40273-021-01128-0. Epub 2022 Jan 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Individualized health-related quality of life instrument Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile (MYMOP) and its adaptations: a critical appraisal.个体化健康相关生活质量工具 Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile (MYMOP) 及其改编版:批判性评价。
Qual Life Res. 2019 Apr;28(4):879-893. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-2046-6. Epub 2018 Nov 13.
2
COSMIN methodology for evaluating the content validity of patient-reported outcome measures: a Delphi study.COSMIN 方法学用于评估患者报告结局测量的内容效度:一项德尔菲研究。
Qual Life Res. 2018 May;27(5):1159-1170. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1829-0. Epub 2018 Mar 17.
3
In support of an individualized approach to assessing quality of life: comparison between Patient Generated Index and standardized measures across four health conditions.
支持采用个体化方法评估生活质量:患者生成指数与四种健康状况下标准化测量方法的比较
Qual Life Res. 2017 Mar;26(3):601-609. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1480-6. Epub 2016 Dec 17.
4
A review of the application, feasibility, and the psychometric properties of the individualized measures in cancer.癌症个体化测量方法的应用、可行性及心理测量特性综述。
Qual Life Res. 2017 May;26(5):1091-1104. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1458-4. Epub 2016 Nov 18.
5
Using group data to treat individuals: understanding heterogeneous treatment effects in the age of precision medicine and patient-centred evidence.使用群体数据治疗个体:在精准医学和以患者为中心的证据时代理解异质性治疗效果。
Int J Epidemiol. 2016 Dec 1;45(6):2184-2193. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyw125.
6
Quality of life in children: A critical examination of concepts, approaches, issues, and future directions.儿童生活质量:概念、方法、问题及未来方向的批判性研究
Clin Psychol Rev. 2016 Apr;45:131-43. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2015.11.007. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
7
Patient involvement in the development of patient-reported outcome measures: a scoping review.患者参与患者报告结局指标的制定:一项范围综述
Health Expect. 2017 Feb;20(1):11-23. doi: 10.1111/hex.12442. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
8
Do parents and children agree? Quality-of-life assessment of children with inflammatory bowel disease and their parents.父母与孩子的意见一致吗?炎症性肠病患儿及其父母的生活质量评估。
J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2014 Apr;58(4):481-5. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000000236.
9
The use of qualitative methods in developing the descriptive systems of preference-based measures of health-related quality of life for use in economic evaluation.在开发基于偏好的健康相关生活质量衡量指标的描述性系统用于经济评估中使用定性方法。
Value Health. 2012 Dec;15(8):991-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2012.08.2204. Epub 2012 Oct 25.
10
Standard 5: selection, measurement, and reporting of outcomes in clinical trials in children.标准5:儿童临床试验中结局的选择、测量与报告。
Pediatrics. 2012 Jun;129 Suppl 3:S146-52. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0055H.