• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

聋人研究参与的伦理问题。定性证据综合。

Ethics of research engagement with Deaf people. A qualitative evidence synthesis.

机构信息

Department of Philosophy and Bioethics, Faculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.

Research Ethics in Medicine Study Group (REMEDY), Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.

出版信息

J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2024 Sep 20;29(4):443-455. doi: 10.1093/jdsade/enae024.

DOI:10.1093/jdsade/enae024
PMID:38879760
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11523497/
Abstract

In this article, we explore ethical issues of Deaf people's engagement in research. To focus on the perspectives of Deaf people, we investigated existing qualitative and mixed methods research within a qualitative evidence synthesis. Our synthesis is based on a systematic database search (Scopus, PubMed) and reference check of included papers which resulted in 27 eligible papers. We analyzed the data using thematic synthesis and developed 5 analytical themes. The results present research as a struggle for Deaf people and emphasize the need for changes regarding recognition of Deaf research in a cross-cultural context, maintaining equal and partner relations, and provision of accessible communication. Our research contributes to understanding what the ethical inclusion of Deaf people in research implies. It may also support the development of evidence-based normative recommendations and scientific cooperation between Deaf and hearing people.

摘要

在本文中,我们探讨了聋人参与研究的伦理问题。为了关注聋人的观点,我们在定性证据综合中调查了现有的定性和混合方法研究。我们的综合研究基于系统的数据库搜索(Scopus、PubMed)和对包括的论文的参考文献检查,结果有 27 篇合格的论文。我们使用主题综合分析数据,并制定了 5 个分析主题。结果表明,研究是聋人斗争的体现,并强调需要在跨文化背景下承认聋人研究,保持平等和伙伴关系,并提供可访问的沟通。我们的研究有助于理解将聋人纳入研究的伦理含义。它也可能支持基于证据的规范建议的制定和聋人和听力人士之间的科学合作。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cbf/11523497/4d4f07856690/enae024f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cbf/11523497/f964fb139889/enae024f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cbf/11523497/46210f47e751/enae024f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cbf/11523497/c27749e2a542/enae024f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cbf/11523497/e61311ef0c59/enae024f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cbf/11523497/a76fd3b742a1/enae024f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cbf/11523497/f43d79aa9e51/enae024f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cbf/11523497/4d4f07856690/enae024f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cbf/11523497/f964fb139889/enae024f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cbf/11523497/46210f47e751/enae024f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cbf/11523497/c27749e2a542/enae024f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cbf/11523497/e61311ef0c59/enae024f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cbf/11523497/a76fd3b742a1/enae024f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cbf/11523497/f43d79aa9e51/enae024f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6cbf/11523497/4d4f07856690/enae024f7.jpg

相似文献

1
Ethics of research engagement with Deaf people. A qualitative evidence synthesis.聋人研究参与的伦理问题。定性证据综合。
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2024 Sep 20;29(4):443-455. doi: 10.1093/jdsade/enae024.
2
Deaf people's help-seeking following trauma: Experiences with and recommendations for the Massachusetts behavioral health care system.聋人创伤后的求助行为:在马萨诸塞州行为医疗保健系统中的经历与建议。
Psychol Trauma. 2017 Mar;9(2):239-248. doi: 10.1037/tra0000219. Epub 2016 Oct 31.
3
Perspectives of people who are deaf and hard of hearing on mental health, recovery, and peer support.聋人和重听人士对心理健康、康复和同伴支持的看法。
Community Ment Health J. 2013 Dec;49(6):649-57. doi: 10.1007/s10597-012-9569-z. Epub 2012 Nov 13.
4
Toward ethical research practice with deaf participants.迈向针对聋人参与者的符合伦理的研究实践。
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2014 Jul;9(3):59-66. doi: 10.1177/1556264614540589.
5
Lived Experience: Deaf Professionals' Stories of Resilience and Risks.生活经历:聋人专业人士的复原力与风险故事
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2020 Apr 5;25(2):239-249. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enz045.
6
"They still phone even though they know I'm deaf": exploring experiences of deaf people in health services in Wales, UK.“他们明明知道我耳聋,还是打电话”:探索英国威尔士聋人在卫生服务中的体验。
J Public Health (Oxf). 2024 Aug 25;46(3):e520-e527. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/fdae112.
7
Hearing Managers of Deaf Workers: A Phenomenological Investigation in the Restaurant Industry.失聪员工的听力管理者:餐饮行业的现象学调查
Am Ann Deaf. 2018;163(1):13-34. doi: 10.1353/aad.2018.0009.
8
Being deaf and being other things: young Asian people negotiating identities.失聪与其他:年轻亚洲人对身份认同的探寻
Soc Sci Med. 2002 Nov;55(10):1757-69. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00308-2.
9
Deaf/Hearing Research Partnerships.聋人/听力研究伙伴关系
Am Ann Deaf. 2017;161(5):571-582. doi: 10.1353/aad.2017.0007.
10
Perceptions of communication choice and usage among African American hearing parents: Afrocentric cultural implications for African American deaf and hard of hearing children.非裔美国听力正常父母对沟通方式选择和使用的认知:以非洲中心文化对非裔美国聋儿及重听儿童的影响
Am Ann Deaf. 2012 Spring;157(1):7-15. doi: 10.1353/aad.2012.1606.

本文引用的文献

1
Six Arguments for Vygotskian Pragmatism in Deaf Education: Multimodal Multilingualism as Applied Harm Reduction.聋教育中的维果茨基实用主义的六个论据:作为应用危害减少的多模态多语言。
Am Ann Deaf. 2023;168(1):56-79. doi: 10.1353/aad.2023.a904167.
2
Barriers and facilitators to the inclusion of deaf people in clinical trials.将聋人纳入临床试验的障碍和促进因素。
Clin Trials. 2023 Oct;20(5):576-580. doi: 10.1177/17407745231177376. Epub 2023 May 26.
3
How to embed ethics into laboratory research.如何将伦理道德融入实验室研究。
Account Res. 2024 Oct;31(7):767-785. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2023.2165916. Epub 2023 Jan 17.
4
Patient and public involvement in hearing research: opportunities, impact and reflections with case studies from the Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness.患者和公众参与听力研究:机遇、影响和案例研究反思——来自曼彻斯特听力学和耳聋中心的报告
Int J Audiol. 2024 Feb;63(2):146-154. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2022.2155881. Epub 2022 Dec 26.
5
Ethics framework for citizen science and public and patient participation in research.公民科学和公众及患者参与研究的伦理框架。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Mar 13;23(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00761-4.
6
Application of the truth and reconciliation model to meaningfully engage deaf sign language users in the research process.将真相与和解模式应用于有意义地让聋人手语使用者参与研究过程。
Cultur Divers Ethnic Minor Psychol. 2023 Jan;29(1):15-23. doi: 10.1037/cdp0000445. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
7
Ethics parallel research: an approach for (early) ethical guidance of biomedical innovation.伦理平行研究:一种用于生物医学创新(早期)伦理指导的方法。
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Sep 1;21(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00524-z.
8
Deaf ACCESS: Adapting Consent Through Community Engagement and State-of-the-Art Simulation.聋人无障碍通道:通过社区参与和最先进的模拟进行同意书的调整。
J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ. 2020 Jan 3;25(1):115-125. doi: 10.1093/deafed/enz035.
9
Understanding Multilevel Factors Related to Urban Community Trust in Healthcare and Research.理解与城市社区对医疗保健和研究的信任相关的多层次因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019 Sep 6;16(18):3280. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16183280.
10
Purposive sampling in a qualitative evidence synthesis: a worked example from a synthesis on parental perceptions of vaccination communication.目的抽样在定性证据综合中的应用:来自父母对疫苗接种沟通感知综合研究的一个实例。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Jan 31;19(1):26. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0665-4.