Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands.
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Mar 13;23(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00761-4.
Citizen science and models for public participation in health research share normative ideals of participation, inclusion, and public and patient engagement. Academic researchers collaborate in research with members of the public involved in an issue, maximizing all involved assets, competencies, and knowledge. In citizen science new ethical issues arise, such as who decides, who participates, who is excluded, what it means to share power equally, or whose knowledge counts. This article aims to present an ethics framework that offers a lens of understanding and heuristic guidelines to deal with ethical issues in citizen science.
We conducted seven case studies between 2015 and 2021 to attune and validate the ethics framework for the context of citizen science. The cases related to studies with older adults, people with a psychiatric vulnerability, people dependent on community care, people who are unemployed or living in poverty or both, and young adults with respiratory disease.
Ethics in citizen science reaches beyond the ethical issues in traditional biomedical and health research. It entails more than following procedures about informed consent and privacy and submitting a proposal to a Medical Research Ethics Committee. Ethics in citizen science relates to everyday ethical issues during the study, including relational and moral complexities concerning collaboration, sharing power, and democratic decision-making. Dealing with these issues requires ethics work of researchers. This entails seeing ethically salient issues and reflecting on everyday ethical issues. Ethics work consists of seven features: framing work, role work, emotion work, identity work, reason work, relationship work, and performance work. All are relevant for researchers in citizen science.
Ethical issues in citizen science often relate to power differentials, partnership, and collaboration between academics and non-academics. The ethics framework prepares researchers for the work needed in citizen science to act responsibly and offers a heuristic guide to reflect on ethics. Reflection on ethics is a pathway towards ethical citizen science, especially if researchers collaboratively reflect in partnership with non-academics who are subject to the moral issue.
公民科学和公众参与健康研究的模式共享参与、包容以及公众和患者参与的规范理想。学术研究人员与参与问题的公众成员合作,最大限度地发挥所有相关人员的资产、能力和知识。在公民科学中,出现了新的伦理问题,例如谁来决定、谁参与、谁被排除在外、平等分享权力意味着什么,或者谁的知识算数。本文旨在提出一个伦理框架,为公民科学中的伦理问题提供一个理解的视角和启发式的指导方针。
我们在 2015 年至 2021 年期间进行了七项案例研究,以调整和验证公民科学背景下的伦理框架。这些案例涉及与老年人、精神脆弱人群、依赖社区护理的人群、失业或生活贫困或两者兼有的人群以及患有呼吸道疾病的年轻人相关的研究。
公民科学中的伦理超越了传统生物医学和健康研究中的伦理问题。它不仅仅涉及到知情同意和隐私的程序以及向医学伦理委员会提交提案。公民科学中的伦理涉及到研究过程中的日常伦理问题,包括关于合作、权力分享和民主决策的关系和道德复杂性。处理这些问题需要研究人员进行伦理工作。这需要看到有道德意义的问题并反思日常的伦理问题。伦理工作包括七个特征:框架工作、角色工作、情感工作、身份工作、推理工作、关系工作和绩效工作。所有这些对于公民科学中的研究人员都是相关的。
公民科学中的伦理问题通常涉及到学术人员和非学术人员之间的权力差异、伙伴关系和合作。伦理框架为研究人员在公民科学中开展负责任的工作做好准备,并提供了一个启发式的指南,以反思伦理问题。对伦理的反思是实现道德公民科学的途径,特别是如果研究人员与受道德问题影响的非学术人员合作进行反思。