Psychology Department, Miami University, 90 N Patterson Ave, Oxford, OH, 45056, USA.
Clin Child Fam Psychol Rev. 2024 Sep;27(3):807-831. doi: 10.1007/s10567-024-00492-5. Epub 2024 Jun 16.
The literature on the role of parenting in the relation between child inhibited temperament and child anxiety is inconsistent, with some literature supporting a moderating role and some literature supporting alternative (e.g., mediating) roles. A systematic review of the evidence that parenting moderates the longitudinal relation between child inhibited temperament and child anxiety is needed. A systematic review of the literature was conducted in February and March of 2022 and repeated in January of 2024. Ten articles met criteria for inclusion, with 39 moderation analyses of interest among them. All included studies were conducted in Western contexts with predominately White, middle-class families. Thus, the current review can only be generalized to this population. Despite inconsistent findings, some evidence indicated that avoidance-promoting parenting behaviors such as overprotection and overinvolvement moderate the relation between child inhibited temperament and social anxiety symptoms, in particular. There was a lack of evidence that parenting behaviors moderate the relation between child inhibited temperament and anxiety disorders, and that affect-related parenting behaviors (e.g., negativity) moderate the relation between child inhibited temperament and non-social anxiety symptoms. There was mixed evidence regarding the moderating role of control-related parenting behaviors in the relation between child inhibited temperament and non-social anxiety symptoms, with some evidence that encouraging behaviors moderate this relation. Future research is needed to clarify these inconsistent and nuanced findings and investigate this moderation in non-Western, non-White, and low-income populations.
关于父母教养在儿童抑制气质与儿童焦虑之间关系中的作用的文献不一致,一些文献支持调节作用,一些文献支持替代(例如,中介)作用。需要对父母教养在儿童抑制气质与儿童焦虑之间的纵向关系中起调节作用的证据进行系统评价。2022 年 2 月至 3 月和 2024 年 1 月进行了文献系统评价。有 10 篇文章符合纳入标准,其中有 39 项关于调节分析的研究。所有纳入的研究均在西方背景下进行,参与者主要为白人中产阶级家庭。因此,目前的综述只能推广到这一人群。尽管结果不一致,但一些证据表明,避免促进的育儿行为,如过度保护和过度卷入,调节了儿童抑制气质与社交焦虑症状之间的关系,尤其是。没有证据表明育儿行为调节了儿童抑制气质与焦虑障碍之间的关系,也没有证据表明与情感相关的育儿行为(如消极性)调节了儿童抑制气质与非社交焦虑症状之间的关系。控制相关的育儿行为在儿童抑制气质与非社交焦虑症状之间关系中的调节作用存在混合证据,一些证据表明鼓励行为调节了这种关系。未来的研究需要澄清这些不一致和细微的发现,并在非西方、非白人和低收入人群中调查这种调节作用。