Hobaica Steven, Szkody Erica, Sotomayor Ian, Liao Jessica, Schleider Jessica L
Independent Researcher.
Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University.
J Sex Res. 2025 May;62(4):632-640. doi: 10.1080/00224499.2024.2355564. Epub 2024 Jun 16.
Despite the well-known benefits of comprehensive sexual health education, the majority of school sexual health education curricula in the United States (U.S.) is non-comprehensive and excludes LGBTQ+ students. This exclusion may contribute to poor health outcomes in LGBTQ+ youth, with some research beginning to document these experiences and provide recommendations for curricula changes. Using a sample of LGBTQ+ youth across the U.S. (ages 13-17; = 809), this study characterizes youths' sexual health education experiences and provides curricula recommendations using a mixed methods approach. Quantitative analyses revealed that LGBTQ+ content is often excluded from sexual health education, particularly topics surrounding sexual orientation and gender identity, which youth wanted to learn more about. Furthermore, participants identified several extracurricular sources of sexual health education, including online spaces, friends, and personal experiences, which were often preferred. Qualitative analyses suggested that LGBTQ+ youth described their sexual health education as exclusive of LGBTQ+ content, often being based in abstinence, religious principles, or described as oppressive (e.g. hearing LGBTQ+ negative remarks) or suppressive (e.g. skipping required LGBTQ+ content). LGBTQ+ youth also provided recommendations for future curricula. Findings can inform curricula development and implementation, as well as policy change, to ascertain that all youth have access to inclusive and comprehensive sexual health education.
尽管全面性健康教育的益处广为人知,但美国大多数学校的性健康教育课程并不全面,将 LGBTQ+ 学生排除在外。这种排斥可能导致 LGBTQ+ 青少年健康状况不佳,一些研究已开始记录这些经历,并为课程改革提供建议。本研究以美国各地年龄在 13 至 17 岁之间的 809 名 LGBTQ+ 青少年为样本,采用混合方法描述了青少年的性健康教育经历并提供了课程建议。定量分析显示,性健康教育中常常没有 LGBTQ+ 相关内容,尤其是围绕性取向和性别认同的主题,而青少年希望了解更多这些内容。此外,参与者指出了性健康教育的几个课外来源,包括网络空间、朋友和个人经历,这些来源通常更受青睐。定性分析表明,LGBTQ+ 青少年表示他们接受的性健康教育不包含 LGBTQ+ 相关内容,通常以禁欲、宗教原则为基础,或者被描述为具有压迫性(例如听到对 LGBTQ+ 的负面评价)或压制性(例如跳过必修的 LGBTQ+ 相关内容)。LGBTQ+ 青少年还为未来的课程提供了建议。研究结果可为课程开发与实施以及政策变革提供参考,以确保所有青少年都能获得包容且全面的性健康教育。