Rojczyk Philine, Heller Carina, Seitz-Holland Johanna, Kaufmann Elisabeth, Sydnor Valerie J, Berger Luisa, Pankatz Lara, Rathi Yogesh, Bouix Sylvain, Pasternak Ofer, Salat David, Hinds Sidney R, Esopenko Carrie, Fortier Catherine B, Milberg William P, Shenton Martha E, Koerte Inga K
Psychiatry Neuroimaging Laboratory, Department of Psychiatry, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Somerville, MA, United States.
cBRAIN, Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Psychosomatics, and Psychotherapy, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Front Neurol. 2024 May 31;15:1360424. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1360424. eCollection 2024.
Intimate partner violence (IPV) perpetration is highly prevalent among veterans. Suggested risk factors of IPV perpetration include combat exposure, post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, alcohol use, and mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). While the underlying brain pathophysiological characteristics associated with IPV perpetration remain largely unknown, previous studies have linked aggression and violence to alterations of the limbic system. Here, we investigate whether IPV perpetration is associated with limbic microstructural abnormalities in military veterans. Further, we test the effect of potential risk factors (i.e., PTSD, depression, substance use disorder, mTBI, and war zone-related stress) on the prevalence of IPV perpetration.
Structural and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (dMRI) data were acquired from 49 male veterans of the Iraq and Afghanistan wars (Operation Enduring Freedom/Operation Iraqi Freedom; OEF/OIF) of the Translational Research Center for TBI and Stress Disorders (TRACTS) study. IPV perpetration was assessed using the psychological aggression and physical assault sub-scales of the Revised Conflict Tactics Scales (CTS2). Odds ratios were calculated to assess the likelihood of IPV perpetration in veterans with either of the following diagnoses: PTSD, depression, substance use disorder, or mTBI. Fractional anisotropy tissue (FA) measures were calculated for limbic gray matter structures (amygdala-hippocampus complex, cingulate, parahippocampal gyrus, entorhinal cortex). Partial correlations were calculated between IPV perpetration, neuropsychiatric symptoms, and FA.
Veterans with a diagnosis of PTSD, depression, substance use disorder, or mTBI had higher odds of perpetrating IPV. Greater war zone-related stress, and symptom severity of PTSD, depression, and mTBI were significantly associated with IPV perpetration. CTS2 (psychological aggression), a measure of IPV perpetration, was associated with higher FA in the right amygdala-hippocampus complex ( = 0.400, = 0.005).
Veterans with psychiatric disorders and/or mTBI exhibit higher odds of engaging in IPV perpetration. Further, the more severe the symptoms of PTSD, depression, or TBI, and the greater the war zone-related stress, the greater the frequency of IPV perpetration. Moreover, we report a significant association between psychological aggression against an intimate partner and microstructural alterations in the right amygdala-hippocampus complex. These findings suggest the possibility of a structural brain correlate underlying IPV perpetration that requires further research.
亲密伴侣暴力行为在退伍军人中极为普遍。亲密伴侣暴力行为的潜在风险因素包括战斗经历、创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)、抑郁症、酗酒以及轻度创伤性脑损伤(mTBI)。虽然与亲密伴侣暴力行为相关的潜在脑病理生理特征在很大程度上仍不明确,但先前的研究已将攻击和暴力行为与边缘系统的改变联系起来。在此,我们调查亲密伴侣暴力行为是否与退伍军人的边缘系统微观结构异常有关。此外,我们测试潜在风险因素(即PTSD、抑郁症、物质使用障碍、mTBI和与战区相关的压力)对亲密伴侣暴力行为发生率的影响。
从创伤性脑损伤与应激障碍转化研究中心(TRACTS)研究的49名伊拉克和阿富汗战争男性退伍军人(持久自由行动/伊拉克自由行动;OEF/OIF)获取结构和扩散加权磁共振成像(dMRI)数据。使用修订版冲突策略量表(CTS2)的心理攻击和身体攻击子量表评估亲密伴侣暴力行为。计算优势比以评估患有以下任何一种诊断的退伍军人实施亲密伴侣暴力行为的可能性:PTSD、抑郁症、物质使用障碍或mTBI。计算边缘灰质结构(杏仁核 - 海马复合体、扣带回、海马旁回、内嗅皮质)的分数各向异性组织(FA)测量值。计算亲密伴侣暴力行为、神经精神症状和FA之间的偏相关性。
诊断为PTSD、抑郁症、物质使用障碍或mTBI的退伍军人实施亲密伴侣暴力行为的几率更高。与战区相关的压力越大,以及PTSD、抑郁症和mTBI的症状严重程度越高,与亲密伴侣暴力行为显著相关。CTS2(心理攻击),一种亲密伴侣暴力行为的测量指标,与右侧杏仁核 - 海马复合体中较高的FA相关(= 0.400,= 0.005)。
患有精神疾病和/或mTBI的退伍军人实施亲密伴侣暴力行为的几率更高。此外,PTSD、抑郁症或TBI的症状越严重,以及与战区相关的压力越大,亲密伴侣暴力行为的频率就越高。此外,我们报告了针对亲密伴侣的心理攻击与右侧杏仁核 - 海马复合体微观结构改变之间的显著关联。这些发现表明,亲密伴侣暴力行为背后可能存在脑结构相关性,这需要进一步研究。