• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响智障及严重挑战行为个体在寄宿照料机构中安全感的因素:一项基于专业人员和服务使用者视角的定性研究

Factors affecting the feelings of safety among individuals with mild intellectual disabilities and severe challenging behaviour in residential care: A qualitative study of professional and service users' perspectives.

作者信息

Lokman Suzanne, Bal Roland, Didden Robert, Embregts Petri Jcm

机构信息

Tranzo, Tilburg School of Social and Behavorial Sciences, Tilburg University, The Netherlands.

Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Intellect Disabil. 2025 Sep;29(3):607-628. doi: 10.1177/17446295241246569. Epub 2024 Jun 18.

DOI:10.1177/17446295241246569
PMID:38889201
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12397534/
Abstract

This qualitative study focuses on what feeling safe means for people with mild intellectual disabilities and severe challenging behaviour, and which factors affect their sense of safety. Thematic analysis was used to analyse data collected during (1) ethnographic longitudinal research and (2) interviews and focus groups among professionals and service users. Feelings of safety were related to three main themes: (1) a physical environment that reduces risks and temptations; (2) a reliable, predictable, and supportive environment; and (3) an accepting environment that enables service users to establish a normal life. An analysis of which factors affect service users' sense of safety identified 20 themes (e.g. team climate) and 34 subthemes (e.g. interactions with other service users). Many of these factors were interconnected. Future research should explore what residential service organisations for people with intellectual disabilities and external actors (e.g. the police) can do to promote service users' feelings of safety.

摘要

这项定性研究聚焦于对轻度智力残疾和严重挑战性行为患者而言,感到安全意味着什么,以及哪些因素会影响他们的安全感。采用主题分析法对在(1)人种志纵向研究以及(2)专业人员和服务使用者的访谈及焦点小组期间收集的数据进行分析。安全感与三个主要主题相关:(1)一个能降低风险和诱惑的物理环境;(2)一个可靠、可预测且支持性的环境;(3)一个能使服务使用者过上正常生活的接纳性环境。对哪些因素影响服务使用者安全感的分析确定了20个主题(如团队氛围)和34个子主题(如与其他服务使用者的互动)。这些因素中有许多是相互关联的。未来的研究应探索针对智力残疾患者的住宿服务机构以及外部行为者(如警方)可以采取哪些措施来提升服务使用者的安全感。

相似文献

1
Factors affecting the feelings of safety among individuals with mild intellectual disabilities and severe challenging behaviour in residential care: A qualitative study of professional and service users' perspectives.影响智障及严重挑战行为个体在寄宿照料机构中安全感的因素:一项基于专业人员和服务使用者视角的定性研究
J Intellect Disabil. 2025 Sep;29(3):607-628. doi: 10.1177/17446295241246569. Epub 2024 Jun 18.
2
Community Member Views on Autism Intervention: Effects of Closeness to Autistic People with Intellectual Disabilities And Nonspeaking Autistic People.社区成员对自闭症干预的看法:与智障自闭症患者及无语言能力自闭症患者亲近程度的影响。
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Sep 16;6(3):253-271. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0202. eCollection 2024 Sep.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
Stigma Management Strategies of Autistic Social Media Users.自闭症社交媒体用户的污名管理策略
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):273-282. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0095. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Parent training interventions for parents with intellectual disability.针对智障父母的家长培训干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 13;7(7):CD007987. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007987.pub3.
6
How lived experiences of illness trajectories, burdens of treatment, and social inequalities shape service user and caregiver participation in health and social care: a theory-informed qualitative evidence synthesis.疾病轨迹的生活经历、治疗负担和社会不平等如何影响服务使用者和照顾者参与健康和社会护理:一项基于理论的定性证据综合分析
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2025 Jun;13(24):1-120. doi: 10.3310/HGTQ8159.
7
The role of relational work in promoting safe community participation by people with mild intellectual disabilities and severe challenging behaviour living in residential facilities.关系工作在促进居住在住宿机构中的轻度智力残疾和严重挑战性行为患者安全参与社区方面的作用。
Res Dev Disabil. 2025 Mar;158:104946. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2025.104946. Epub 2025 Feb 17.
8
Service Users' Perspectives on an Integrated Electronic Care Record in Mental Health Care: Qualitative Vignette and Interview Study.服务使用者对精神卫生保健中综合电子病历的看法:定性情景与访谈研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 Jun 3;13:e64162. doi: 10.2196/64162.
9
An evaluation of a multidisciplinary care planning tool for people with intellectual disabilities and behaviours of concern.对一种针对智障人士及相关问题行为的多学科护理规划工具的评估。
Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2025 Jun;71(4):655-669. doi: 10.1177/00207640241299395. Epub 2024 Nov 29.
10
Effectiveness of Smart Continence Care for People With Profound Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities: Cluster Randomized Trial.智能失禁护理对重度智力残疾和多重残疾患者的有效性:整群随机试验。
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Jul 31;27:e66389. doi: 10.2196/66389.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating a Virtual Community-of-Practice as Implementation Strategy for the Needs Assessment Framework in Intellectual Disability Care: A Quasi-Experimental Multi-Methods Study.评估虚拟实践社区作为智力残疾护理需求评估框架的实施策略:一项准实验性多方法研究。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2025 Jan;38(1):e70007. doi: 10.1111/jar.70007.
2
Effectiveness of formal onboarding for facilitating organizational socialization: A systematic review.正式入职辅导对于促进组织社会化的有效性:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2023 Feb 16;18(2):e0281823. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281823. eCollection 2023.
3
Aggressive behaviour of psychiatric patients with mild and borderline intellectual disabilities in general mental health care.一般心理健康护理中轻度和边缘智力障碍精神病患者的攻击性行为。
PLoS One. 2022 Oct 3;17(10):e0272502. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272502. eCollection 2022.
4
"Connectedness" between people with intellectual disabilities and challenging behaviour and support staff: Perceptions of psychologists and support staff.智障人士和具有挑战性行为的人与支持人员之间的“联系”:心理学家和支持人员的看法。
J Intellect Disabil. 2023 Mar;27(1):121-137. doi: 10.1177/17446295211056820. Epub 2022 Jan 27.
5
When face-to-face interviews are not possible: tips and tricks for video, telephone, online chat, and email interviews in qualitative research.当无法进行面对面访谈时:定性研究中视频、电话、在线聊天和电子邮件访谈的技巧和窍门。
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2021 May 22;20(4):392-396. doi: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvab038.
6
Group climate, aggressive incidents and coercion in a secure forensic setting for individuals with mild intellectual disability or borderline intellectual functioning: A multilevel study.群体氛围、攻击事件与轻度智力障碍或边缘智力个体在安全司法环境中的强制:一项多层次研究
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2021 Jul;34(4):1026-1036. doi: 10.1111/jar.12841. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
7
Feeling safe, avoiding harm: Safety priorities of children and young people with disability and high support needs.感到安全,避免伤害:高支持需求残疾儿童和青少年的安全重点。
J Intellect Disabil. 2021 Dec;25(4):583-602. doi: 10.1177/1744629520917496. Epub 2020 Apr 24.
8
Residents' and resident representatives' perspectives on the influence of the organisational environment on challenging behaviour.居民和居民代表对组织环境对挑战性行为影响的看法。
Res Dev Disabil. 2020 May;100:103629. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2020.103629. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
9
Feeling safe or unsafe in psychiatric inpatient care, a hospital-based qualitative interview study with inpatients in Sweden.在瑞典进行的一项针对住院患者的基于医院的定性访谈研究:精神病住院护理中的安全感与不安全感。
Int J Ment Health Syst. 2019 Apr 8;13:23. doi: 10.1186/s13033-019-0282-y. eCollection 2019.
10
Influence of the organizational environment on challenging behaviour in people with intellectual disabilities: Professionals' views.组织环境对智障人士挑战性行为的影响:专业人士的观点。
J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2019 May;32(3):610-621. doi: 10.1111/jar.12555. Epub 2018 Dec 25.