Yamani Naser, Ahmed Aymen, Khan Mohammad, Wilson Zachary, Shakoor Muteia, Qadri Syeda Fizza, Unzek Samuel, Silver Marc, Mookadam Farouk
Division of Cardiology, Banner University Medical Center, University of Arizona, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Department of Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Cardiooncology. 2024 Jun 18;10(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s40959-024-00235-z.
The effects of exercise in patients with breast cancer (BC), has shown some profit, but consistency and magnitude of benefit remains unclear. We aimed to conduct a meta-analysis to assess the benefits of varying types of exercises in patients with BC.
Literature search was conducted across five electronic databases (MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar and Cochrane) from 1st January 2000 through 19th January 2024. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the impact of different types of exercise on outcomes related to fitness and quality of life (QOL) in patients with BC were considered for inclusion. Outcomes of interest included cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), health-related quality of life (HRQOL), muscle strength, fatigue and physical function. Evaluations were reported as mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and pooled using random effects model. A p value < 0.05 was considered significant.
Thirty-one relevant articles were included in the final analysis. Exercise intervention did not significantly improved the CRF in patients with BC when compared with control according to treadmill ergometer scale (MD: 4.96; 95%Cl [-2.79, 12.70]; P = 0.21), however exercise significantly improved CRF according to cycle ergometer scales (MD 2.07; 95% Cl [1.03, 3.11]; P = 0.0001). Physical function was significantly improved as well in exercise group reported by 6-MWT scale (MD 80.72; 95% Cl [55.67, 105.77]; P < 0.00001). However, exercise did not significantly improve muscle strength assessed using the hand grip dynamometer (MD 0.55; 95% CI [-1.61, 2.71]; P = 0.62), and fatigue assessed using the MFI-20 (MD -0.09; 95% CI [-5.92, 5.74]; P = 0.98) and Revised Piper scales (MD -0.26; 95% CI [-1.06, 0.55] P = 0.53). Interestingly, exercise was found to improve HRQOL when assessed using the FACT-B scale (MD 8.57; 95% CI [4.53, 12.61]; P < 0.0001) but no significant improvements were noted with the EORTIC QLQ-C30 scale (MD 1.98; 95% CI [-1.43, 5.40]; P = 0.25).
Overall exercise significantly improves the HRQOL, CRF and physical function in patients with BC. HRQOL was improved with all exercise types but the effects on CRF vary with cycle versus treadmill ergometer. Exercise failed to improve fatigue-related symptoms and muscle strength. Large RCTs are required to evaluate the effects of exercise in patients with BC in more detail.
运动对乳腺癌(BC)患者的影响已显示出一些益处,但益处的一致性和程度仍不明确。我们旨在进行一项荟萃分析,以评估不同类型运动对BC患者的益处。
于2000年1月1日至2024年1月19日在五个电子数据库(MEDLINE、科学网、Scopus、谷歌学术和考克兰)中进行文献检索。纳入评估不同类型运动对BC患者健康和生活质量(QOL)相关结局影响的随机对照试验(RCT)。感兴趣的结局包括心肺适能(CRF)、健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)、肌肉力量、疲劳和身体功能。评估结果以平均差(MDs)及95%置信区间(CIs)报告,并使用随机效应模型进行汇总。p值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
最终分析纳入了31篇相关文章。与对照组相比,根据跑步机测力计量表,运动干预并未显著改善BC患者的CRF(MD:4.96;95%Cl[-2.79,12.70];P=0.21),然而,根据自行车测力计量表,运动显著改善了CRF(MD 2.07;95%Cl[1.03,3.11];P=0.0001)。根据6分钟步行试验量表报告,运动组的身体功能也显著改善(MD 80.72;95%Cl[55.67,105.77];P<0.00001)。然而,运动并未显著改善使用握力计评估的肌肉力量(MD 0.55;95%CI[-1.61,2.71];P=0.62),以及使用MFI-20评估的疲劳(MD -0.09;95%CI[-5.92,5.74];P=0.98)和修订的派珀量表(MD -0.26;95%CI[-1.06,0.55] P=0.53)。有趣的是,当使用FACT-B量表评估时,运动被发现可改善HRQOL(MD 8.57;95%CI[4.53,12.61];P<0.0001),但使用EORTIC QLQ-C30量表时未发现显著改善(MD 1.98;95%CI[-1.43,5.40];P=0.25)。
总体而言,运动显著改善了BC患者的HRQOL、CRF和身体功能。所有运动类型均可改善HRQOL,但对CRF的影响因自行车测力计与跑步机测力计而异。运动未能改善与疲劳相关的症状和肌肉力量。需要大型RCT来更详细地评估运动对BC患者的影响。