Huang Shuman, Hu Pingge, Zhao Zhenmeng, Shi Li
Key Laboratory of Artificial Intelligence and Personalized Learning in Education of Henan Province, College of Computer and Information Engineering, Henan Normal University, Xinxiang 453007, China.
Department of Automation, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Animals (Basel). 2024 May 26;14(11):1577. doi: 10.3390/ani14111577.
Animals detect targets using a variety of visual cues, with the visual salience of these cues determining which environmental features receive priority attention and further processing. Surround modulation plays a crucial role in generating visual saliency, which has been extensively studied in avian tectal neurons. Recent work has reported that the suppression of tectal neurons induced by motion contrasting stimulus is stronger than that by luminance contrasting stimulus. However, the underlying mechanism remains poorly understood. In this study, we built a computational model (called Generalized Linear-Dynamic Modulation) which incorporates independent nonlinear tuning mechanisms for excitatory and inhibitory inputs. This model aims to describe how tectal neurons encode contrasting stimuli. The results showed that: (1) The dynamic nonlinear integration structure substantially improved the accuracy (significant difference ( < 0.001, paired -test) in the goodness of fit between the two models) of the predicted responses to contrasting stimuli, verifying the nonlinear processing performed by tectal neurons. (2) The modulation difference between luminance and motion contrasting stimuli emerged from the predicted response by the full model but not by that with only excitatory synaptic input (spatial luminance: 89 ± 2.8% (GL_DM) vs. 87 ± 2.1% (GL_DMexc); motion contrasting stimuli: 87 ± 1.7% (GL_DM) vs. 83 ± 2.2% (GL_DMexc)). These results validate the proposed model and further suggest the role of dynamic nonlinear spatial integrations in contextual visual information processing, especially in spatial integration, which is important for object detection performed by birds.
动物利用各种视觉线索来检测目标,这些线索的视觉显著性决定了哪些环境特征会得到优先关注和进一步处理。周围调制在产生视觉显著性方面起着关键作用,这一点在鸟类顶盖神经元中已得到广泛研究。最近的研究报告称,运动对比刺激诱导的顶盖神经元抑制比亮度对比刺激更强。然而,其潜在机制仍知之甚少。在本研究中,我们构建了一个计算模型(称为广义线性 - 动态调制),该模型纳入了兴奋性和抑制性输入的独立非线性调谐机制。该模型旨在描述顶盖神经元如何编码对比刺激。结果表明:(1)动态非线性整合结构显著提高了对对比刺激预测反应的准确性(两种模型拟合优度之间存在显著差异(<0.001,配对检验)),验证了顶盖神经元进行的非线性处理。(2)亮度和运动对比刺激之间的调制差异出现在完整模型的预测反应中,而仅具有兴奋性突触输入的模型则没有(空间亮度:89±2.8%(GL_DM)对87±2.1%(GL_DMexc);运动对比刺激:87±1.7%(GL_DM)对83±2.2%(GL_DMexc))。这些结果验证了所提出的模型,并进一步表明动态非线性空间整合在上下文视觉信息处理中的作用,特别是在空间整合方面,这对鸟类进行目标检测很重要。