Department of Neurology, Cognition and Aging Center, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan.
Institute for Translational Research in Biomedicine, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung 83301, Taiwan.
Int J Mol Sci. 2024 May 21;25(11):5607. doi: 10.3390/ijms25115607.
The purpose of this study was to investigate whether plasma biomarkers can help to diagnose, differentiate from Alzheimer disease (AD), and stage cognitive performance in patients with positron emission tomography (PET)-confirmed primary age-related tauopathy, termed tau-first cognitive proteinopathy (TCP) in this study. In this multi-center study, we enrolled 285 subjects with young-onset AD (YOAD; = 55), late-onset AD (LOAD; = 96), TCP ( = 44), and cognitively unimpaired controls (CTL; = 90) and analyzed plasma Aβ42/Aβ40, pTau181, neurofilament light (NFL), and total-tau using single-molecule assays. Amyloid and tau centiloids reflected pathological burden, and hippocampal volume reflected structural integrity. Receiver operating characteristic curves and areas under the curves (AUCs) were used to determine the diagnostic accuracy of plasma biomarkers compared to hippocampal volume and amyloid and tau centiloids. The Mini-Mental State Examination score (MMSE) served as the major cognitive outcome. Logistic stepwise regression was used to assess the overall diagnostic accuracy, combining fluid and structural biomarkers and a stepwise linear regression model for the significant variables for MMSE. For TCP, tau centiloid reached the highest AUC for diagnosis (0.79), while pTau181 could differentiate TCP from YOAD (accuracy 0.775) and LOAD (accuracy 0.806). NFL reflected the clinical dementia rating in TCP, while pTau181 (rho = 0.3487, = 0.03) and Aβ42/Aβ40 (rho = -0.36, = 0.02) were significantly correlated with tau centiloid. Hippocampal volume (unstandardized β = 4.99, = 0.01) outperformed all of the fluid biomarkers in predicting MMSE scores in the TCP group. Our results support the superiority of tau PET to diagnose TCP, pTau181 to differentiate TCP from YOAD or LOAD, and NFL for functional staging.
这项研究的目的是探讨血浆生物标志物是否有助于诊断、区分阿尔茨海默病(AD),以及对正电子发射断层扫描(PET)确诊的原发性年龄相关性 tau 病患者进行认知表现分期,在本研究中称为 tau 优先认知蛋白病(TCP)。在这项多中心研究中,我们纳入了 285 名具有早发性 AD(YOAD;n=55)、晚发性 AD(LOAD;n=96)、TCP(n=44)和认知正常对照(CTL;n=90)的受试者,并使用单分子分析方法分析了血浆 Aβ42/Aβ40、pTau181、神经丝轻链(NFL)和总 tau。淀粉样蛋白和 tau 百分位数反映了病理负担,海马体积反映了结构完整性。接受者操作特征曲线和曲线下面积(AUCs)用于确定与海马体积以及淀粉样蛋白和 tau 百分位数相比,血浆生物标志物的诊断准确性。简易精神状态检查评分(MMSE)作为主要认知结局。逻辑逐步回归用于评估包括液体和结构生物标志物的整体诊断准确性,以及用于 MMSE 显著变量的逐步线性回归模型。对于 TCP,tau 百分位数达到了诊断的最高 AUC(0.79),而 pTau181 可以区分 TCP 与 YOAD(准确性 0.775)和 LOAD(准确性 0.806)。NFL 反映了 TCP 中的临床痴呆评定量表,而 pTau181(rho=0.3487, =0.03)和 Aβ42/Aβ40(rho=-0.36, =0.02)与 tau 百分位数显著相关。海马体积(未标准化 β=4.99, =0.01)在预测 TCP 组的 MMSE 评分方面优于所有液体生物标志物。我们的研究结果支持 tau PET 优于诊断 TCP,pTau181 优于区分 TCP 与 YOAD 或 LOAD,以及 NFL 用于功能分期。