Suppr超能文献

线性瘢痕患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表的 Rasch 分析:患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表 v2.1 的建议。

Rasch Analysis of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale in Linear Scars: Suggestions for a Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale v2.1.

机构信息

From the Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Lissone (Monza and Brianza) Institute; the Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Veruno (Novara) Institute; the Italian Society of Physiotherapy; and U.O.C. Chirurgia della Mano, MultiMedica Holding S.p.A. Ospedale San Giuseppe, Milano.

出版信息

Plast Reconstr Surg. 2019 Dec;144(6):1073e-1079e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000006265.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) v2.0 is a widely used instrument to evaluate postsurgical scars. Its two subscales respectively investigate the patient's and clinician's opinion on the scar quality. However, psychometric studies of the POSAS have indicated that its metric performance is suboptimal, and structural adjustments may be appropriate. The authors aimed to verify through Rasch analysis the measurement properties of the POSAS v2.0, and propose eventual structural refinements for an easier and more confident use of the scale in clinical practice and research.

METHODS

Consecutive patients admitted to two rehabilitation centers for postsurgery rehabilitation over a 2-year period underwent scar assessments with the POSAS v2.0. We performed Rasch analysis to examine the scale's dimensionality, rating categories, item fit, reliability indices, local item independence, and differential item functioning.

RESULTS

The study population consisted of 115 patients. The 10 response options of the POSAS showed malfunctioning, and thus were collapsed, forming a parsimonious five-level rating scale, which helped to improve the measurement accuracy. After that, unidimensionality of both subscales was confirmed. Then, internal construct validity of the POSAS v2.0 was demonstrated (through item fit to the Rasch model). Reliability indices were high (≥0.80). No significant differential item functioning was detected concerning age or sex.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates the good psychometric properties of a simplified Rasch-based version of the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale with five response options (POSAS v2.1) in patients with postsurgical linear scars, and provides insights for future refinement of the tool.

摘要

背景

患者和观察者瘢痕评估量表(POSAS)v2.0 是一种广泛用于评估手术瘢痕的工具。它的两个分量表分别调查了患者和临床医生对瘢痕质量的看法。然而,POSAS 的心理测量研究表明,其度量性能并不理想,可能需要进行结构调整。作者旨在通过 Rasch 分析验证 POSAS v2.0 的测量特性,并为该量表在临床实践和研究中的更轻松和更自信的使用提出可能的结构改进。

方法

连续两年在两家康复中心接受手术后康复治疗的患者接受了 POSAS v2.0 的瘢痕评估。我们进行了 Rasch 分析,以检查量表的维度、评分类别、项目拟合、可靠性指数、局部项目独立性和差异项目功能。

结果

研究人群由 115 名患者组成。POSAS 的 10 个反应选项表现出故障,因此被合并为一个简洁的五等级评分量表,这有助于提高测量精度。之后,两个分量表的单维性得到了确认。然后,证明了 POSAS v2.0 的内部结构有效性(通过项目拟合 Rasch 模型)。可靠性指数较高(≥0.80)。未发现年龄或性别对差异项目功能有显著影响。

结论

本研究证明了简化的基于 Rasch 的 POSAS 有五个反应选项(POSAS v2.1)在手术后线性瘢痕患者中的良好心理测量特性,并为该工具的进一步改进提供了见解。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验