Nieforth Leanne O, Leighton Sarah C, Miller Elise A, O'Haire Marguerite E
College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Arizona, 1580 E Hanley Blvd., Oro Valley, AZ, USA.
Center for the Human Animal Bond, Purdue University, 725 Harrison St., West Lafayette, IN, USA.
Hum Anim Interact. 2022 Dec;2022. doi: 10.1079/hai.2022.0026. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
Routine surveying of academic centers focused on the human-animal bond is critical to understand the trajectory of the field and to create an environment where centers can learn from one another and build collaborations. The purpose of this manuscript was to report the findings of a survey of these human-animal bond centers, to summarize the status of the field, and to identify changes within the field since 2016. Survey questions concentrated on the demographic characteristics, engagement programs, educational opportunities, and research focuses of the centers. Findings suggest that the field continues to grow as one-third of human-animal bond centers are less than 10 years old. The number of centers that participated in this survey increased by 31% compared to the previous survey (O'Haire et al., 2018). Centers have developed a variety of engagement programs, including animal-assisted intervention and companion animal education programs. About half of the centers (48%) offer degree programs and about one quarter of the centers (24%) offer certificate programs. Most centers (95%) focus their research on companion animals with the most studied companion animal being dogs (95%). The most frequent data collection method was surveys (86%). Qualitative analyses, behavior measures, and physiological measures were also common. The most notable changes from the 2016 survey include overall growth of the field (indicated by the establishment of new centers) and a shift in the specialty area of directors, moving from 44% of directors being veterinarians in 2016 survey to 90% having a human-focused specialty in the 2021 survey. Most centers' research focused on animal-assisted interventions which is consistent with the previous survey. As the field of the human-animal bond continues to grow and more centers emerge, ongoing evaluation of offerings is important to track changes, identify needs, and foster success.
对专注于人类与动物纽带关系的学术中心进行定期调查,对于了解该领域的发展轨迹以及营造一个各中心能够相互学习并建立合作关系的环境至关重要。本手稿的目的是报告对这些人类与动物纽带关系中心的调查结果,总结该领域的现状,并确定自2016年以来该领域内的变化。调查问题集中在各中心的人口统计学特征、参与项目、教育机会以及研究重点。调查结果表明,该领域持续发展,因为三分之一的人类与动物纽带关系中心成立时间不足10年。与上一次调查相比,参与本次调查的中心数量增加了31%(奥黑尔等人,2018年)。各中心已开展了各种参与项目,包括动物辅助干预和伴侣动物教育项目。约一半的中心(48%)提供学位项目,约四分之一的中心(24%)提供证书项目。大多数中心(95%)将研究重点放在伴侣动物上,研究最多的伴侣动物是狗(95%)。最常用的数据收集方法是调查(86%)。定性分析、行为测量和生理测量也很常见。与2016年调查相比,最显著的变化包括该领域的整体发展(以新中心的成立为标志)以及主任专业领域的转变,从2016年调查中44%的主任是兽医,转变为2021年调查中有90%的主任具有以人类为重点的专业。大多数中心的研究集中在动物辅助干预上,这与上次调查一致。随着人类与动物纽带关系领域的不断发展以及更多中心的出现,持续评估所提供的内容对于跟踪变化、确定需求并促进成功至关重要。