• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Safety and efficacy of ambulatory tubeless mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of 10-25 mm renal calculi A retrospective study.非卧床无管迷你经皮肾镜取石术治疗10 - 25毫米肾结石的安全性和有效性:一项回顾性研究
Can Urol Assoc J. 2024 Oct;18(10):341-347. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.8764.
2
[Comparison of tubeless-percutaneous nephrolithotomy and ureteroscopic lithotripsy in treatment of upper-ureteral calculi sized ≥ 1.5 cm].无管经皮肾镜取石术与输尿管镜碎石术治疗直径≥1.5 cm上段输尿管结石的比较
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2015 Feb 18;47(1):170-4.
3
Totally tubeless, tubeless, and tubed percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treating kidney stones.完全无管化经皮肾镜取石术、无管化经皮肾镜取石术和有管化经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 28;7(7):CD012607. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012607.pub2.
4
Totally tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones: analysis of clinical outcomes and cost.完全无管化与标准经皮肾镜取石术治疗肾结石:临床结果与成本分析
J Endourol. 2014 Dec;28(12):1487-94. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0421.
5
Complications of tubeless versus standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy.无管化与标准经皮肾镜取石术的并发症比较。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2024 Jan;56(1):63-67. doi: 10.1007/s11255-023-03772-1. Epub 2023 Sep 5.
6
Percutaneous stone surgery using a tubeless technique with fibrin sealant: report of our first 107 cases.经皮无管石术联合纤维蛋白胶在结石治疗中的应用:附 107 例报告
BJU Int. 2012 Dec;110(11 Pt C):E1048-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11209.x. Epub 2012 Oct 9.
7
Ambulatory percutaneous nephrolithotomy: what is the rate of readmission?门诊经皮肾镜取石术:再入院率是多少?
J Endourol. 2015 Apr;29(4):410-4. doi: 10.1089/end.2014.0584. Epub 2014 Oct 23.
8
Comparing Totally Tubeless and Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with Standard Techniques.比较完全无管和无管经皮肾镜取石术与标准技术。
Mymensingh Med J. 2024 Oct;33(4):980-988.
9
Totally tubeless single access tract mini-percutaneous nephrolithotripsy in treatment of large burden > 2-cm and/or complex renal stones: a case series of 62 patients.完全无管单通道微创经皮肾镜取石术治疗大体积 > 2cm 和/或复杂肾结石:一项 62 例病例系列研究。
BMC Urol. 2022 Apr 16;22(1):61. doi: 10.1186/s12894-022-01012-9.
10
Supracostal access: does it affect tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy efficacy and safety?经肋缘下入路:会影响无管经皮肾镜取石术的疗效和安全性吗?
Int Braz J Urol. 2010 Mar-Apr;36(2):171-6. doi: 10.1590/s1677-55382010000200006.

引用本文的文献

1
Ambulatory, tubeless PCNL is a viable option in 10-25 mm stones.对于10至25毫米的结石,非卧床无管经皮肾镜取石术是一种可行的选择。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2024 Oct;18(10):348. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.8990.

本文引用的文献

1
Initial results of the implementation of an ambulatory mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy program.经皮肾镜取石术日间手术项目实施的初步结果。
Actas Urol Esp (Engl Ed). 2023 Sep;47(7):450-456. doi: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2023.03.005. Epub 2023 Jun 12.
2
Outcomes and Costs Following Mini-percutaneous Nephrolithotomy or Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy for 1-2-cm Renal Stones: Data From a Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial.微创经皮肾镜取石术或软性输尿管镜碎石术治疗1-2厘米肾结石后的疗效与成本:一项前瞻性随机临床试验的数据
J Urol. 2023 Jun;209(6):1151-1158. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000003397. Epub 2023 May 9.
3
Outcomes in Lower Pole Kidney Stone Management Using Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Compared With Retrograde Intra Renal Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.与逆行肾内手术相比,采用迷你经皮肾镜取石术治疗下极肾结石的疗效:一项随机对照试验
Cureus. 2023 Feb 23;15(2):e35343. doi: 10.7759/cureus.35343. eCollection 2023 Feb.
4
Comparative outcomes and cost of ambulatory PCNL in select kidney stone patients.选择的肾结石患者门诊经皮肾镜取石术的比较结果和成本。
Urolithiasis. 2022 Dec 26;51(1):22. doi: 10.1007/s00240-022-01392-5.
5
Comparison of postoperative outcomes of mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy: a meta-analysis.微创经皮肾镜取石术与标准经皮肾镜取石术术后疗效比较的Meta 分析。
Urolithiasis. 2022 Oct;50(5):523-533. doi: 10.1007/s00240-022-01349-8. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
6
Best Practice in Interventional Management of Urolithiasis: An Update from the European Association of Urology Guidelines Panel for Urolithiasis 2022.最佳介入性尿路结石管理实践:2022 年欧洲泌尿外科学会尿路结石指南专家组更新。
Eur Urol Focus. 2023 Jan;9(1):199-208. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2022.06.014. Epub 2022 Aug 1.
7
Comparison of mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy and standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy for renal stones >2cm: a systematic review and meta-analysis.比较微创经皮肾镜取石术和标准经皮肾镜取石术治疗>2cm 肾结石:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int Braz J Urol. 2022 Jul-Aug;48(4):637-648. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2021.0347.
8
A systematic review and meta-analysis of minimally invasive vs. standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the surgical management of renal stones.微创与标准经皮肾镜取石术在肾结石外科治疗中的系统评价和荟萃分析
Exp Ther Med. 2021 Mar;21(3):213. doi: 10.3892/etm.2021.9645. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
9
What Do We Mean by "Stone Free," and How Accurate Are Urologists in Predicting Stone-Free Status Following Ureteroscopy?我们所说的“无石”是什么意思,以及泌尿科医生预测输尿管镜检查后无石状态的准确性如何?
J Endourol. 2021 Jul;35(7):961-966. doi: 10.1089/end.2020.0933. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
10
Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Is a Noninferior Modality to Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for the Management of 20-40mm Renal Calculi: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.微创经皮肾镜取石术与标准经皮肾镜取石术治疗 20-40mm 肾结石的非劣效性比较:一项多中心随机对照试验。
Eur Urol. 2021 Jan;79(1):114-121. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.026. Epub 2020 Sep 29.

非卧床无管迷你经皮肾镜取石术治疗10 - 25毫米肾结石的安全性和有效性:一项回顾性研究

Safety and efficacy of ambulatory tubeless mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in the management of 10-25 mm renal calculi A retrospective study.

作者信息

Nikoufar Parsa, Hodhod Amr, Hadi Ruba Abdul, Abbas Loay, Vangala Sai K, Zakaria Ahmed S, Gawish Maher, Alaref Amer, Rozenberg Radu, Elmansy Hazem

机构信息

Department of Urology, Thunder Bay Regional Health Sciences Centre, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada.

Department of Urology, King Abdulaziz Medical City, National Guard Hospitals Affairs, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

出版信息

Can Urol Assoc J. 2024 Oct;18(10):341-347. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.8764.

DOI:10.5489/cuaj.8764
PMID:38896485
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11477521/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of ambulatory minipercutaneous nephrolithotomy (mini-PCNL) in a totally tubeless exit (without a nephrostomy tube or an internal stent) and tubeless exit (without a nephrostomy tube but with an internal stent) for the treatment of renal calculi 10-25 mm in size.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who underwent mini-PCNL at our institution between September 2018 and September 2022. The study included a cohort of 95 patients diagnosed with renal calculi measuring 10-25 mm. All patients underwent a computed tomography (CT) renal colic scan preoperatively, on postoperative day one (POD 1), and at three-month followup. Patient demographics and outcome parameters were recorded, including stone characteristics, operative time, hospital stay, stone-free rate (SFR), complication rates, and subsequent emergency room (ER) visits. Patients were considered stone-free if they had no fragments or residual fragments measuring <4 mm.

RESULTS

The median maximum stone diameter was 16 mm (10-25 mm). Twenty-nine patients (30.5%) had multiple renal calculi. The median operative time was 64 (38-135) minutes. Eighty-six patients (90.5%) underwent a totally tubeless procedure, without a nephrostomy tube or an internal stent. All patients were discharged home on the same operative day with a median hospitalization time of six hours. Seven (7.4%) postoperative ER visits were recorded, and two (2.1%) led to hospital readmission. The frequency of grade I, II, and III Clavien-Dindo complications were 18 (18.9%), one (1.1%), and one (1.1%), respectively. The SFR on POD 1 and three-month followup was 73.7% and 92.6%, respectively. Two patients in the study required retreatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Ambulatory tubeless mini-PCNL is a safe and effective treatment option for 10-25 mm renal stones. Experienced institutions can safely adopt ambulatory mini-PCNL as a treatment option without an increased risk of postoperative complications, ER visits, or hospital readmissions.

摘要

引言

本研究旨在评估门诊微创经皮肾镜取石术(mini-PCNL)在完全无管出院(无肾造瘘管或内支架)和无管出院(无肾造瘘管但有内支架)治疗10 - 25毫米肾结石中的安全性和有效性。

方法

我们对2018年9月至2022年9月在我院接受mini-PCNL的患者进行了回顾性分析。该研究纳入了95例诊断为10 - 25毫米肾结石的患者队列。所有患者在术前、术后第1天(POD 1)和3个月随访时均接受了计算机断层扫描(CT)肾绞痛扫描。记录患者的人口统计学和结局参数,包括结石特征、手术时间、住院时间、无石率(SFR)、并发症发生率以及随后的急诊室(ER)就诊情况。如果患者没有<4毫米的碎片或残留碎片,则认为其无结石。

结果

结石最大直径的中位数为16毫米(10 - 25毫米)。29例患者(30.5%)有多发性肾结石。手术时间中位数为64(38 - 135)分钟。86例患者(90.5%)接受了完全无管手术,无肾造瘘管或内支架。所有患者均在手术当天出院,住院时间中位数为6小时。记录到7例(7.4%)术后急诊室就诊,其中2例(2.1%)导致再次入院。I级、II级和III级Clavien-Dindo并发症的发生率分别为18例(18.9%)、1例(1.1%)和1例(1.1%)。POD 1和3个月随访时的无石率分别为73.7%和92.6%。该研究中有2例患者需要再次治疗。

结论

门诊无管mini-PCNL是治疗10 - 25毫米肾结石的一种安全有效的治疗选择。经验丰富的机构可以安全地采用门诊mini-PCNL作为一种治疗选择,而不会增加术后并发症、急诊室就诊或再次入院的风险。