• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[粉煤灰对城市多源有机固体废物处理效率及细菌群落结构的影响]

[Effects of Fly Ash on the Efficiency and Bacterial Community Structure of Urban Multi-source Organic Solid Waste].

作者信息

Zou Jia-Cheng, Du Yan-Bin, Su Kai-Wen, Yu Cai-Hong, Liu Ying-Chao, Wang Chen-Chen, Xu De-Zhuo

机构信息

School of Chemical & Environmental Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, Beijing 100083, China.

出版信息

Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2024 Jun 8;45(6):3638-3648. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202306033.

DOI:10.13227/j.hjkx.202306033
PMID:38897783
Abstract

To achieve efficient resource utilization of fly ash and multi-source organic waste, a composting experiment was carried out to investigate the effects of fly ash on co-aerobic composting using kitchens, chicken manure, and sawdust (15:5:2). The effects of different application doses (5 % and 10 %, calculated in total wet weight of organic solid waste) of fly ash on physical and chemical properties, nutrient elements, and bacterial community structure during co-composting were evaluated. The results showed that the addition dose of 5 % and 10 % fly ash significantly increased the highest temperature (56.6 ℃ and 56.9 ℃) and extended the thermophilic period to nine days. Compared with that in the control, the total nutrient content of compost products in the treatments of 5 % FA and 10 % FA was increased by 4.09 % and 13.55 %, respectively. The bacterial community structure changed greatly throughout the composting, and the bacterial diversity of all treatments increased obviously. In the initial stage of composting, Proteobacteria was the dominant phylum of bacteria, with a relative abundance ranging from 35.26 % to 39.40 %. In the thermophilic period, Firmicutes dominated; its relative abundance peaked at 52.46 % in the 5 % FA treatment and 67.72 % in the 10 % FA treatment. and were the predominant groups in the thermophilic period of composting. The relative abundance of and in the 5 % FA and 10 % FA treatments were 33.41 % and 62.89 %() and 33.06 % and 12.23 %(), respectively. The results of the redundancy analysis (RDA) revealed that different physicochemical indicators had varying degrees of influence on bacteria, with organic matter, pH, available phosphorus, and available potassium being the main environmental factors influencing bacterial community structure. In summary, the addition of fly ash promoted the harmlessness and maturation of co- aerobic composting of urban multi-source organic waste, while optimizing microbial community structure and improving the quality and efficiency of composting.

摘要

为实现粉煤灰和多源有机废弃物的高效资源利用,开展了一项堆肥实验,以研究粉煤灰对利用厨余、鸡粪和锯末(15:5:2)进行的共好氧堆肥的影响。评估了不同施用量(5%和10%,按有机固体废物总湿重计算)的粉煤灰对共堆肥过程中物理化学性质、营养元素和细菌群落结构的影响。结果表明,添加5%和10%的粉煤灰显著提高了最高温度(56.6℃和56.9℃),并将嗜热期延长至9天。与对照相比,5%粉煤灰处理和10%粉煤灰处理的堆肥产品总养分含量分别提高了4.09%和13.55%。整个堆肥过程中细菌群落结构变化很大,所有处理的细菌多样性均明显增加。在堆肥初期,变形菌门是优势菌门,相对丰度在35.26%至39.40%之间。在嗜热期,厚壁菌门占主导;其相对丰度在5%粉煤灰处理中达到峰值52.46%,在10%粉煤灰处理中达到峰值67.72%。芽孢杆菌属和嗜热放线菌属是堆肥嗜热期的优势菌群。5%粉煤灰处理和10%粉煤灰处理中芽孢杆菌属和嗜热放线菌属的相对丰度分别为33.41%和62.89%(芽孢杆菌属)以及33.06%和12.23%(嗜热放线菌属)。冗余分析(RDA)结果表明,不同理化指标对细菌有不同程度的影响,其中有机质、pH、有效磷和有效钾是影响细菌群落结构的主要环境因素。综上所述,添加粉煤灰促进了城市多源有机废弃物共好氧堆肥的无害化和成熟化,同时优化了微生物群落结构,提高了堆肥质量和效率。

相似文献

1
[Effects of Fly Ash on the Efficiency and Bacterial Community Structure of Urban Multi-source Organic Solid Waste].[粉煤灰对城市多源有机固体废物处理效率及细菌群落结构的影响]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2024 Jun 8;45(6):3638-3648. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202306033.
2
Impacts and mechanism of coal fly ash on kitchen waste composting performance: The perspective of microbial community.煤飞灰对厨余垃圾堆肥性能的影响及其作用机制:微生物群落的角度。
Chemosphere. 2024 Feb;350:141068. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.141068. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
3
[Microbial Community Succession in Industrial Composting with Livestock Manure and Peach Branches and Relations with Environmental Factors].[畜禽粪便与桃枝工业堆肥过程中微生物群落演替及其与环境因子的关系]
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2020 Feb 8;41(2):997-1004. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201907153.
4
Insight into the dynamic microbial community and core bacteria in composting from different sources by advanced bioinformatics methods.利用先进的生物信息学方法深入了解不同来源堆肥中动态微生物群落和核心细菌。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Jan;30(4):8956-8966. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-20388-7. Epub 2022 Apr 25.
5
Appraising co-composting efficiency of biodegradable plastic bags and food wastes: Assessment microplastics morphology, greenhouse gas emissions, and changes in microbial community.评价可生物降解塑料袋和厨余垃圾的共堆肥效率:评估微塑料形态、温室气体排放和微生物群落变化。
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Jun 1;875:162356. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.162356. Epub 2023 Feb 22.
6
Effects of chemical additives and mature compost on reducing nitrogen loss during food waste composting.化学添加剂和成熟堆肥对减少食物垃圾堆肥过程中氮损失的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(13):39000-39011. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24752-5. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
7
Succession of Microbial Community during the Co-Composting of Food Waste Digestate and Garden Waste.在厨余垃圾和园林垃圾共堆肥过程中微生物群落的演替。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 12;19(16):9945. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19169945.
8
Application of microbial agents in organic solid waste composting: a review.微生物菌剂在有机固体废弃物堆肥化中的应用:综述。
J Sci Food Agric. 2024 Aug 15;104(10):5647-5659. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.13323. Epub 2024 Feb 6.
9
Seeding effect on cocomposting wastewater biosolids with coal fly ash.粉煤灰对污水生物固体共堆肥的接种效应。
Water Environ Res. 2001 Sep-Oct;73(5):633-8. doi: 10.2175/106143001x143367.
10
High temperature melting of municipal solid waste incineration (MSWI) fly ash and co-disposal technology with blast furnaces.高温熔融城市生活垃圾焚烧(MSWI)飞灰与高炉协同处置技术。
Waste Manag. 2024 Jun 30;183:191-198. doi: 10.1016/j.wasman.2024.05.016. Epub 2024 May 17.