Suppr超能文献

文拉法辛与去甲替林预防偏头痛的疗效和安全性:一项双盲随机临床试验。

Efficacy and safety of venlafaxine versus nortriptyline for the preventive treatment of migraine: A double-blind randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Neurophysiology Research Center, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.

Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Shahed University, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2024 Aug;243:108400. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108400. Epub 2024 Jun 17.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Migraine, as a primary headache disorder, stands as one of the primary causes of disability worldwide. Consequently, prophylactic treatments are highly recommended for individuals experiencing recurrent migraine episodes. Our study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety profiles of venlafaxine and nortriptyline in the prophylactic management of migraine.

METHODS

In this single-center, randomized, double-blind clinical trial, 210 migraine patients were allocated into two groups in a 1:1 ratio. One group received venlafaxine (37.5 mg, orally twice daily), while the other group administered nortriptyline (25 mg, orally once daily). A neurologist documented (1) headache intensity using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and 6-point Behavioral Rating Scale (BRS-6), (2) headache frequency (per month), and (3) headache duration (in hours) of participants on days 0, 45, and 90 of the intervention.

RESULTS

Following the 90-day intervention, a significant decrease was observed in VAS, BRS-6, frequency, and duration of headaches within both groups (all with p-values <0.001). No difference in VAS, BRS-6, or headache durations was observed between the two groups after 45 and 90 days of treatment (all p-values > 0.05). Although the headache frequency exhibited no difference between the groups after 45 days (p-value = 0.097), a significantly lower frequency in the venlafaxine group was observed at day 90 of the intervention (p-value = 0.011). The reductions in attack parameters in the 0-45- and 0-90-day intervals did not meet statistical significance between the two groups (p-values > 0.05). 77.0 % of the participants in the venlafaxine group and 79.2 % in the nortriptyline group experienced a minimum of 50 % improvement in all attack parameters. Venlafaxine demonstrated a statistically significant lower incidence of adverse reactions in comparison to nortriptyline (p-value = 0.005). A total of 33 adverse drug reactions were documented in the venlafaxine group and 53 in the nortriptyline group, with insomnia observed in the former and xerostomia in the latter as the most prevalent side effects.

CONCLUSIONS

Venlafaxine and nortriptyline demonstrate clinically significant and comparable therapeutic efficacy for migraine patients in reducing the intensity, frequency, and duration of headache attacks. Venlafaxine may be preferred to nortriptyline in the context of migraine preventive treatment under comparable conditions due to its lower incidence of adverse effects.

摘要

目的

偏头痛作为一种原发性头痛疾病,是全球主要致残病因之一。因此,对于反复发作偏头痛的患者,推荐进行预防性治疗。本研究旨在比较文拉法辛和去甲替林在偏头痛预防性治疗中的疗效和安全性。

方法

这是一项单中心、随机、双盲临床试验,210 例偏头痛患者按 1:1 的比例随机分为两组。一组给予文拉法辛(37.5mg,每日口服 2 次),另一组给予去甲替林(25mg,每日口服 1 次)。一位神经科医生记录了(1)参与者在干预第 0、45 和 90 天的视觉模拟量表(VAS)和 6 点行为评分量表(BRS-6)评估的头痛强度,(2)头痛频率(每月),和(3)头痛持续时间(小时)。

结果

在 90 天的干预后,两组的 VAS、BRS-6、头痛频率和持续时间均显著降低(均 P<0.001)。两组在治疗后 45 天和 90 天的 VAS、BRS-6 或头痛持续时间无差异(均 P>0.05)。尽管两组在 45 天后的头痛频率无差异(P 值=0.097),但在干预第 90 天,文拉法辛组的头痛频率明显更低(P 值=0.011)。两组在 0-45 天和 0-90 天期间的发作参数减少无统计学意义(P 值>0.05)。文拉法辛组 77.0%的参与者和去甲替林组 79.2%的参与者在所有发作参数中均至少改善了 50%。与去甲替林相比,文拉法辛的不良反应发生率具有统计学意义(P 值=0.005)。文拉法辛组共记录了 33 例药物不良反应,去甲替林组记录了 53 例,前者最常见的不良反应是失眠,后者是口干。

结论

文拉法辛和去甲替林在降低偏头痛患者头痛发作的强度、频率和持续时间方面具有临床意义且相当的疗效。在相似条件下,由于文拉法辛的不良反应发生率较低,其可能优于去甲替林用于偏头痛的预防性治疗。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验