• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估伊朗食品和药物管理局与美国 FDA、EMA 和 PMDA 相比在新药批准方面的药物滞后:一项 20 年的分析(2001-2021 年)。

Assessing drug lag in new drug approvals by the Iran Food and Drug Administration compared to the U.S. FDA, EMA, and PMDA: A 20-year analysis (2001-2021).

机构信息

Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, School of Pharmacy, Urmia University of Medical Sciences, Urmia, Iran.

Department of Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmaceutical Administration, Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jun 21;103(25):e38142. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038142.

DOI:10.1097/MD.0000000000038142
PMID:38905367
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11191854/
Abstract

The pharmaceutical industry is vital for healthcare advancement through innovative medications, improving lives. A substantial challenge is "Drug lag," hindering patient access and increasing disease adjusted life years burdens. We aim to examine drug lag for Iran Food and Drug Administration (IFDA) approved drugs versus US Food & Drug Administration (FDA), European Medicines Agency (EMA), and Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA) over 2001 to 2021. We reviewed new molecular entities within this period, using descriptive statistics in Excel 2019. Drug lag is assessed from relative and absolute perspectives, considering approval gaps and annual rates. Among 710 FDA-approved drugs, 410 received EMA approval, 344 from PMDA, and 148 from IFDA. For 148 IFDA and FDA-approved drugs, the maximum drug lag was 237 months. The mean relative drug lag was 65.18 ± 61.56 months. Compared to EMA (112 drugs), the maximum lag was 257 months, with a mean relative lag of 70.29 ± 53.67 months. With PMDA (127 drugs), the maximum lag was 253 months, with a mean relative lag of 38.23 ± 60.57 months. Iran faces significant drug lag compared to developed countries' regulatory bodies, limiting patient access to innovative treatments. Addressing this issue is crucial for timely drug access, reducing disease burdens. Further research and policy interventions are needed to mitigate drug lag's impact on Iran healthcare landscape.

摘要

制药行业通过创新药物为医疗保健的进步做出了重要贡献,改善了人们的生活。一个重大挑战是“药品滞后”,这阻碍了患者的获得药物的机会,并增加了疾病调整生命年的负担。我们旨在研究 2001 年至 2021 年期间,伊朗食品和药物管理局 (IFDA) 批准的药物与美国食品和药物管理局 (FDA)、欧洲药品管理局 (EMA) 和药品和医疗器械管理局 (PMDA) 之间的药品滞后情况。我们在这一期间内审查了新的分子实体,并在 Excel 2019 中使用描述性统计数据。从相对和绝对的角度评估药品滞后,考虑批准差距和年度速度。在 710 种获得 FDA 批准的药物中,有 410 种获得了 EMA 的批准,有 344 种获得了 PMDA 的批准,有 148 种获得了 IFDA 的批准。对于 148 种 IFDA 和 FDA 批准的药物,最大的药品滞后时间为 237 个月。平均相对药品滞后时间为 65.18±61.56 个月。与 EMA(112 种药物)相比,最大滞后时间为 257 个月,平均相对滞后时间为 70.29±53.67 个月。与 PMDA(127 种药物)相比,最大滞后时间为 253 个月,平均相对滞后时间为 38.23±60.57 个月。与发达国家的监管机构相比,伊朗面临着严重的药品滞后问题,限制了患者获得创新治疗的机会。解决这个问题对于及时获得药物、减轻疾病负担至关重要。需要进一步的研究和政策干预来减轻药品滞后对伊朗医疗保健领域的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0da/11191854/d1e006e5579e/medi-103-e38142-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0da/11191854/d1e006e5579e/medi-103-e38142-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0da/11191854/d1e006e5579e/medi-103-e38142-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Assessing drug lag in new drug approvals by the Iran Food and Drug Administration compared to the U.S. FDA, EMA, and PMDA: A 20-year analysis (2001-2021).评估伊朗食品和药物管理局与美国 FDA、EMA 和 PMDA 相比在新药批准方面的药物滞后:一项 20 年的分析(2001-2021 年)。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Jun 21;103(25):e38142. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000038142.
2
Approval of Cancer Drugs With Uncertain Therapeutic Value: A Comparison of Regulatory Decisions in Europe and the United States.具有不确定治疗价值的癌症药物的批准:欧洲和美国的监管决策比较。
Milbank Q. 2020 Dec;98(4):1219-1256. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12476. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
3
Priority review drugs approved by the FDA and the EMA: time for international regulatory harmonization of pharmaceuticals?美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)和欧洲药品管理局(EMA)批准的优先审评药物:是时候实现药品国际监管协调了吗?
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2015 Jul;24(7):709-15. doi: 10.1002/pds.3793. Epub 2015 May 27.
4
Continued cancer drug approvals in Japan and Europe after market withdrawal in the United States: A comparative study of accelerated approvals.美国市场撤市后日本和欧洲继续批准抗癌药物:加速批准的比较研究。
Clin Transl Sci. 2024 Jul;17(7):e13879. doi: 10.1111/cts.13879.
5
The Impact of Regulatory Reforms in China on Drug Lag: The Role of Clinical Development Strategies.中国监管改革对药品滞后的影响:临床开发策略的作用。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2024 Jun;115(6):1400-1407. doi: 10.1002/cpt.3227. Epub 2024 Mar 1.
6
New Oncologic Drugs from 2008 to 2023-Differences in Approval and Access between the United States, Europe and Brazil.2008 年至 2023 年的新型肿瘤药物——美国、欧洲和巴西在审批和可及性方面的差异。
Curr Oncol. 2024 Aug 2;31(8):4443-4454. doi: 10.3390/curroncol31080332.
7
To what degree are review outcomes aligned for new active substances (NASs) between the European Medicines Agency and the US Food and Drug Administration? A comparison based on publicly available information for NASs initially approved in the time period 2014 to 2016.欧洲药品管理局和美国食品药品监督管理局对新活性物质(NASs)的审评结果一致性如何?基于2014年至2016年期间首次获批的NASs公开信息进行的比较。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 25;9(11):e028677. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-028677.
8
An evaluation of drug lag for new drugs approved by the Indian regulator relative to the United States, European Union, and Japanese regulatory agencies: A 15-year analysis (2004-2018).印度监管机构批准的新药相对于美国、欧盟和日本监管机构的药物滞后评估:一项15年分析(2004 - 2018年)
Perspect Clin Res. 2021 Jul-Sep;12(3):159-164. doi: 10.4103/picr.PICR_99_19. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
9
Rationales of delay and difference in regulatory review by Japan, the USA and Europe among new drugs first approved in Japan.日本、美国和欧洲对日本首次批准的新药在监管审查中延迟和差异的理由。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Aug;87(8):3279-3291. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14749. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
10
Comparison between European Medicines Agency and US Food and Drug Administration in Granting Accelerated Marketing Authorizations for Covid-19 Medicines and their Utilized Regulations.比较欧洲药品管理局和美国食品和药物管理局在授予新冠病毒药物加速营销授权及其使用规定方面的情况。
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2024 Jan;58(1):79-113. doi: 10.1007/s43441-023-00574-6. Epub 2023 Oct 20.

引用本文的文献

1
An Empirical Analysis of Anti-Cancer Drug Lags in South Korea.韩国抗癌药物滞后现象的实证分析。
Inquiry. 2025 Jan-Dec;62:469580251363855. doi: 10.1177/00469580251363855. Epub 2025 Aug 11.
2
The Changing Landscape of Heart Failure Drug Clinical Trials in China, 2013-2023.2013 - 2023年中国心力衰竭药物临床试验的变化态势
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2025 Apr 3;19:2597-2608. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S511608. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Drug Lag and Associated Factors for Approved Drugs in Korea Compared with the United States.韩国与美国获批药物的药物滞后及其相关因素比较。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 1;19(5):2857. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19052857.
2
An evaluation of drug lag for new drugs approved by the Indian regulator relative to the United States, European Union, and Japanese regulatory agencies: A 15-year analysis (2004-2018).印度监管机构批准的新药相对于美国、欧盟和日本监管机构的药物滞后评估:一项15年分析(2004 - 2018年)
Perspect Clin Res. 2021 Jul-Sep;12(3):159-164. doi: 10.4103/picr.PICR_99_19. Epub 2021 Jan 8.
3
Evaluation of Drug Lags in Development Initiation, New Drug Application and Approval Between Japan and the USA and the Impact of Local Versus Multi-regional Clinical Trials.
评估日本和美国在药物研发启动、新药申请和批准方面的滞后情况,以及局部与多区域临床试验的影响。
Pharmaceut Med. 2021 Jul;35(4):253-260. doi: 10.1007/s40290-021-00393-w. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
4
Recent trends for drug lag in clinical development of oncology drugs in Japan: does the oncology drug lag still exist in Japan?日本肿瘤药物临床开发中药物滞后的近期趋势:日本是否仍存在肿瘤药物滞后现象?
Int J Clin Oncol. 2015 Dec;20(6):1072-80. doi: 10.1007/s10147-015-0825-4. Epub 2015 Apr 3.
5
Drug lag for cardiovascular drug approvals in India compared with the US and EU approvals.印度心血管药物批准相对于美国和欧盟批准的药物滞后情况。
Indian Heart J. 2013 Jan-Feb;65(1):24-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2012.12.024. Epub 2012 Dec 27.
6
Drug lag and key regulatory barriers in the emerging markets.新兴市场中的药物滞后与关键监管障碍。
Perspect Clin Res. 2010 Apr;1(2):51-6.
7
The notorious "drug lag" for oncology drugs in Japan.日本抗肿瘤药物臭名昭著的“药物滞后”现象。
Invest New Drugs. 2011 Aug;29(4):706-12. doi: 10.1007/s10637-011-9638-0. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
8
Approval of new drugs 1999-2007: comparison of the US, the EU and Japan situations.1999-2007 年新药审批:美国、欧盟和日本情况比较。
J Clin Pharm Ther. 2010 Jun;35(3):289-301. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2710.2009.01099.x.
9
Deconstructing the drug development process: the new face of innovation.剖析药物研发过程:创新的新面貌。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Mar;87(3):356-61. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2009.293. Epub 2010 Feb 3.
10
Lessons from 60 years of pharmaceutical innovation.60年药物创新的经验教训。
Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2009 Dec;8(12):959-68. doi: 10.1038/nrd2961.