Hay R J, Clayton Y M, Griffiths W A, Dowd P M
Br J Dermatol. 1985 Jun;112(6):691-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.1985.tb02338.x.
The merits of oral ketoconazole and griseofulvin in dermatophytosis have been compared in a double blind study on 74 patients with 152 infected sites. The initial daily doses were 200 mg and 500 mg respectively, but these were doubled after 3 months if there was an inadequate clinical response. Treatment was continued either until clinical and mycological remission was achieved or a year of therapy had been given. Seventy-five per cent (total 80) and 74% (total 72) of all infected sites treated with ketoconazole and griseofulvin respectively were cleared of infection. However, in toe nail infections the respective cure rates were only 21% and 17%. Ketoconazole appeared to act more rapidly in curing tinea corporis or tinea cruris due to Trichophyton rubrum, whereas griseofulvin was superior in T. interdigitale infections. No serious side-effects were encountered in either treatment group. In view of the slight risk of drug-induced hepatitis, ketoconazole is best reserved as a second-line drug for toe nail infections unless there are specific indications, such as griseofulvin intolerance. In these cases liver function tests should be monitored regularly throughout therapy.
在一项针对74例患者、152个感染部位的双盲研究中,对口服酮康唑和灰黄霉素治疗皮肤癣菌病的疗效进行了比较。初始每日剂量分别为200毫克和500毫克,但如果临床反应不充分,3个月后剂量加倍。治疗持续进行,直至实现临床和真菌学缓解或已进行一年治疗。酮康唑和灰黄霉素治疗的所有感染部位分别有75%(共80个)和74%(共72个)清除了感染。然而,在趾甲感染中,各自的治愈率仅为21%和17%。酮康唑在治疗由红色毛癣菌引起的体癣或股癣时起效似乎更快,而灰黄霉素在指间毛癣菌感染中更具优势。两个治疗组均未出现严重副作用。鉴于存在药物性肝炎的轻微风险,除非有特定指征,如对灰黄霉素不耐受,酮康唑最好保留作为趾甲感染的二线药物。在这些情况下,整个治疗过程中应定期监测肝功能。