Nuffield Department of Population Health, Big Data Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom.
National Institutes of Health - National Institute for Research in Tuberculosis -International Center for Excellence in Research (NIH-ICER), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India.
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 24;19(6):e0305819. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305819. eCollection 2024.
In the first year of roll-out, vaccination for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) prevented almost 20 million deaths from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Yet, little is known about the factors influencing access to vaccination at the individual level within rural poor settings of low-income countries. The aim of this study was to examine determinants of vaccine receipt in rural India.
A census of a rural village in Tamil Nadu was undertaken from June 2021 to September 2022. We surveyed 775 participants from 262 households. Household-level data on socioeconomic status (SES), water, sanitation, and hygiene practices, and individual-level demographic information, travel history, and biomedical data, including anthropometry, vital signs, and comorbidities, were collected. Logistic regression models with 5-fold cross-validation were used to identify the biomedical, demographic, and socioeconomic determinants of vaccine receipt and the timing of receipt within the first 30 days of eligibility. Vaccine ineligible participants were excluded leaving 659 eligible participants. There were 650 eligible participants with complete biomedical, demographic, and socioeconomic data.
There were 68.0% and 34.0% of individuals (N = 650) who had received one and two vaccine doses, respectively. Participants with household ownership of a permanent account number (PAN) or ration card were 2.15 (95% CI:1.32-3.52) or 3.02 (95% CI:1.72-5.29) times more likely to receive at least one vaccine dose compared to households with no ownership of such cards. Participants employed as housewives or self-employed non-agricultural workers were 65% (95% CI:0.19-0.67) or 59% (95% CI:0.22-0.76) less likely to receive at least one vaccine dose compared to salaried workers. Household PAN card ownership, occupation and age were linked to the timing of vaccine receipt. Participants aged ≤18 and 45-60 years were 17.74 (95% CI:5.07-62.03) and 5.51 (95% CI:2.74-11.10) times more likely to receive a vaccine within 30 days of eligibility compared to 19-44-year-olds. Biomedical factors including BMI, vital signs, comorbidities, and COVID-19 specific symptoms were not consistently associated with vaccine receipt or timing of receipt. No support was found that travel history, contact with COVID-19 cases, and hospital admissions influenced vaccine receipt or timing of receipt.
Factors linked to SES were linked to vaccine receipt, more so than biomedical factors which were targeted by vaccine policies. Future research should explore if government interventions including vaccine mandates, barriers to vaccine access, or peer influence linked to workplace or targeted vaccine promotion campaigns underpin these findings.
在推出的第一年,严重急性呼吸系统综合症冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)疫苗接种预防了近 2000 万人因 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)而死亡。然而,对于在低收入国家农村贫困地区个人层面上影响疫苗接种获取的因素知之甚少。本研究旨在研究印度农村地区疫苗接种的决定因素。
2021 年 6 月至 2022 年 9 月对泰米尔纳德邦的一个农村村庄进行了普查。我们对来自 262 户的 775 名参与者进行了调查。收集了家庭层面的社会经济地位(SES)、水、卫生和个人卫生习惯以及人口统计学信息、旅行史和生物医学数据,包括人体测量、生命体征和合并症。使用 5 倍交叉验证的逻辑回归模型来确定疫苗接种的生物医学、人口统计学和社会经济决定因素以及在符合条件的头 30 天内接种疫苗的时间。排除不符合条件的疫苗接种者,留下 659 名符合条件的参与者。有 650 名符合条件的参与者具有完整的生物医学、人口统计学和社会经济数据。
分别有 68.0%和 34.0%的个体(N=650)接受了一剂和两剂疫苗。与没有此类卡的家庭相比,拥有家庭永久性账户号码(PAN)或配给卡的家庭接种至少一剂疫苗的可能性分别高出 2.15 倍(95%置信区间:1.32-3.52)或 3.02 倍(95%置信区间:1.72-5.29)。作为家庭主妇或自营非农业工人就业的参与者接种至少一剂疫苗的可能性分别低 65%(95%置信区间:0.19-0.67)或 59%(95%置信区间:0.22-0.76)。家庭 PAN 卡所有权、职业和年龄与疫苗接种时间有关。年龄在 18 岁及以下和 45-60 岁的参与者与 19-44 岁的参与者相比,接种疫苗的可能性分别高 17.74 倍(95%置信区间:5.07-62.03)和 5.51 倍(95%置信区间:2.74-11.10)。在符合条件的 30 天内。生物医学因素,包括 BMI、生命体征、合并症和 COVID-19 特定症状,与疫苗接种或接种时间没有一致的关联。没有发现旅行史、与 COVID-19 病例接触和住院与疫苗接种或接种时间有关。
与 SES 相关的因素与疫苗接种有关,而疫苗接种政策针对的生物医学因素则更为重要。未来的研究应探讨政府干预措施,包括疫苗接种强制令、疫苗获取障碍或与工作场所或有针对性的疫苗推广活动相关的同伴影响,是否支持这些发现。