• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以患者为中心的护理干预对心肌梗死后患者自我效能的影响(P2MIR):在葡萄牙医疗保健背景下进行文化适应性定性研究的方案。

Person-centred care intervention to promote self-efficacy in patients following a myocardial infarction (P2MIR): a protocol of a qualitative study for cultural adaptation within a Portuguese healthcare context.

机构信息

Nursing School of Lisbon, Lisbon, Portugal

Nursing Research, Innovation and Development Centre of Lisbon (CIDNUR), Lisbon, Portugal.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 25;14(6):e079598. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079598.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079598
PMID:38925699
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11202657/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Cardiovascular diseases remain a leading cause of death worldwide. Recovery from myocardial infarction is challenging as the causes of symptoms span multiple aspects of health not just physical conditions. Evidence has shown a gap between the waycare is provided in the clinical setting and the person's needs and preferences. The implementation of person-centred care (PCC) interventions can promote recovery from myocardial infarction by allowing a greater understanding of the person's perception and its role on the overall recovering process. This study aims to culturally adapt an evidence-based PCC intervention to enhance self-efficacy in patients after myocardial infarction within a Portuguese healthcare context.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The Portuguese person-centred care for myocardial infarction recovery (P2MIR) intervention is set to be developed from an evidence-based intervention, rooted in the ethics of PCC. An intervention of PCC for patients with acute coronary syndrome, which has been successfully implemented and evaluated in the Swedish healthcare context will be validated, culturally adapted and harmonised to the Portuguese healthcare context by using qualitative methods. To evaluate its acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility, a sample of stakeholders, consisting of a sample of healthcare professionals and a sample of people who suffered a myocardial infarction, will be recruited from a hospital, including both inpatient and outpatient departments. The stakeholders will be invited to semistructured focus group discussions, aiming to gather their perceptions about the P2MIR intervention, which will be previously presented to them. Data analysis will be conducted using content analysis following a deductive-inductive approach to further inform the intervention adaptation process to its final intervention in a Portuguese healthcare context.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study has been reviewed and approved by the Health Ethics' Committees of the Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Ocidental, Lisbon, Portugal (registry number 20170700050). The results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations.

摘要

简介

心血管疾病仍然是全球范围内的主要死因。心肌梗死后的恢复具有挑战性,因为症状的原因涉及多个健康方面,而不仅仅是身体状况。有证据表明,临床护理的方式与患者的需求和偏好之间存在差距。实施以患者为中心的护理(PCC)干预措施可以通过更好地了解患者的感知及其在整体恢复过程中的作用,来促进心肌梗死后的恢复。本研究旨在将一种基于证据的 PCC 干预措施进行文化调适,以增强葡萄牙医疗保健背景下心肌梗死后患者的自我效能感。

方法和分析

葡萄牙人心肌梗死后恢复的以患者为中心的护理(P2MIR)干预措施将基于循证干预措施制定,该干预措施植根于 PCC 的伦理原则。一项基于循证的针对急性冠状动脉综合征患者的 PCC 干预措施已在瑞典医疗保健环境中成功实施和评估,该干预措施将通过定性方法进行验证、文化调适和与葡萄牙医疗保健环境相协调。为了评估其可接受性、适当性和可行性,将从一家医院招募包括住院和门诊部门在内的利益相关者样本,包括一组医疗保健专业人员和一组心肌梗死患者,对他们进行半结构化焦点小组讨论,旨在收集他们对 P2MIR 干预措施的看法,该干预措施将事先向他们介绍。数据分析将采用内容分析法,采用演绎-归纳方法进行分析,以进一步为干预措施在葡萄牙医疗保健环境中的最终干预措施的适应过程提供信息。

伦理和传播

该研究已由葡萄牙里斯本西部中心医院的健康伦理委员会审查和批准(注册号 20170700050)。研究结果将通过同行评议的期刊和会议报告进行传播。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8805/11202657/8e0643471128/bmjopen-2023-079598f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8805/11202657/a0ae46984f48/bmjopen-2023-079598f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8805/11202657/8e0643471128/bmjopen-2023-079598f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8805/11202657/a0ae46984f48/bmjopen-2023-079598f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8805/11202657/8e0643471128/bmjopen-2023-079598f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Person-centred care intervention to promote self-efficacy in patients following a myocardial infarction (P2MIR): a protocol of a qualitative study for cultural adaptation within a Portuguese healthcare context.以患者为中心的护理干预对心肌梗死后患者自我效能的影响(P2MIR):在葡萄牙医疗保健背景下进行文化适应性定性研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 25;14(6):e079598. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079598.
2
[The innovation characteristics of person-centred care as perceived by healthcare professionals: an interview study employing a deductive-inductive content analysis guided by the consolidated framework for implementation research.医护人员感知的以患者为中心的护理的创新特征:采用整合实施研究框架指导的演绎归纳内容分析的访谈研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Sep 3;21(1):904. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06942-y.
3
How to deliver person-centred care for people living with heart failure: a multi stakeholder interview study with patients, caregivers and healthcare professionals in Thailand.如何为心力衰竭患者提供以患者为中心的护理:一项针对泰国患者、护理人员和医疗保健专业人员的多利益相关者访谈研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Dec 18;24(1):1570. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11922-z.
4
Protocol for a cross-sectional study measuring person-centredness among healthcare providers in Malaysian primary care clinics: the adaptation and validation of the Person-Centred Practice Inventory-Staff (PCPI-S) Questionnaire.马来西亚基层医疗诊所中医疗照护提供者以患者为中心之衡量的横断面研究议定书:《以患者为中心的实践量表-员工版》(PCPI-S)问卷的调适与验证。
BMJ Open. 2020 Mar 26;10(3):e034128. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034128.
5
Effectiveness of a culturally adapted biopsychosocial intervention (POHON SIHAT) in improving self-efficacy in patients with diabetes attending primary healthcare clinics in Putrajaya, Malaysia: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial.一种文化适应的生物心理社会干预(POHON SIHAT)在提高马来西亚布城初级保健诊所糖尿病患者自我效能方面的有效性:一项随机对照试验研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2020 Feb 16;10(2):e033920. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033920.
6
Person-Centered Practice in Hospitalized Older Adults with Chronic Illness: Clinical Study Protocol.以慢性疾病住院老年患者为中心的实践:临床研究方案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 5;19(17):11145. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191711145.
7
Exploring older people's experiences of the interpersonal care relationship between nurses and patients during hospitalization in the pandemic period: A qualitative study.探讨疫情期间老年人在住院期间对护士与患者之间人际关怀关系的体验:一项定性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Nov;80(11):4603-4615. doi: 10.1111/jan.16050. Epub 2024 Jan 15.
8
Providing person-centred care for people with multiple chronic conditions: protocol for a qualitative study incorporating client and staff perspectives.为患有多种慢性疾病的人提供以患者为中心的护理:一项纳入患者和工作人员观点的定性研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Oct 7;9(10):e030581. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030581.
9
The Cardiac Self-Efficacy Scale, a useful tool with potential to evaluate person-centred care.心脏自我效能量表是一种有用的工具,具有评估以患者为中心的护理的潜力。
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2015 Dec;14(6):536-43. doi: 10.1177/1474515114548622. Epub 2014 Aug 22.
10
Caesarean section on maternal request: a qualitative study of conflicts related to shared decision-making and person-centred care in Sweden.产妇要求剖宫产:瑞典一项与共享决策和以患者为中心的护理相关的冲突定性研究。
Reprod Health. 2024 Jul 2;21(1):97. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01831-z.

本文引用的文献

1
European Society of Cardiology: cardiovascular disease statistics 2021.欧洲心脏病学会:2021年心血管疾病统计数据
Eur Heart J. 2022 Feb 22;43(8):716-799. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab892.
2
Effectiveness of nurse-led counselling and education on self-efficacy of patients with acute coronary syndrome: A randomized controlled trial.护士主导的咨询和教育对急性冠状动脉综合征患者自我效能的影响:一项随机对照试验。
Nurs Open. 2022 Jan;9(1):775-784. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1129. Epub 2021 Nov 12.
3
A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of Medical Research Council guidance.
制定和评估复杂干预措施的新框架:对医学研究理事会指南的更新。
BMJ. 2021 Sep 30;374:n2061. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n2061.
4
Conceptual Framework for Personal Recovery in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.急性心肌梗死患者个人康复的概念框架。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 Oct 5;10(19):e022354. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.121.022354. Epub 2021 Sep 28.
5
Adapting interventions to new contexts-the ADAPT guidance.适应新环境的干预措施——ADAPT 指南。
BMJ. 2021 Aug 3;374:n1679. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1679.
6
Positivity and Self-Efficacy Beliefs Explaining Health-Related Quality of Life in Cardiovascular Patients.积极心态和自我效能信念对心血管病患者健康相关生活质量的解释作用。
Psicothema. 2021 Aug;33(3):433-441. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2020.476.
7
Person-centred care: looking back, looking forward.以患者为中心的护理:回顾与展望。
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2021 Apr 13;20(2):93-95. doi: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvaa025.
8
Health-related quality of life 1-3 years post-myocardial infarction: its impact on prognosis.心肌梗死后 1-3 年的健康相关生活质量:对预后的影响。
Open Heart. 2021 Feb;8(1). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001499.
9
Men's Positive and Negative Experiences Following Acute Myocardial Infarction.男性在急性心肌梗死后的正性和负性体验。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jan 25;18(3):1053. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18031053.
10
Learning from Gothenburg model of person centred healthcare.借鉴哥德堡以患者为中心的医疗保健模式。
BMJ. 2020 Sep 1;370:m2738. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2738.