Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Dentistry, P.O. Box 9101, Nijmegen 6525 EX, the Netherlands.
Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Dentistry, P.O. Box 9101, Nijmegen 6525 EX, the Netherlands.
Dent Mater. 2024 Sep;40(9):1409-1416. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2024.06.010. Epub 2024 Jun 25.
This study aimed to reproduce and translate clinical presentations in an in vitro set-up and evaluate laboratory outcomes of mechanical properties (flexural strength, fatigue resistance, wear resistance) and link them to the clinical outcomes of the employed materials in the Radboud Tooth Wear Project (RTWP).
Four dental resin composites were selected. 30 discs (Ø12.0 mm, 1.2 mm thick) were fabricated for each of Clearfil TM AP-X (AP), Filtek TM Supreme XTE (FS), Estenia TM C&B (ES), and Lava Ultimate (LU). Cyclic loading (200 N, 2 Hz frequency) was applied concentrically to 15 specimens per group with a spherical steatite indenter (r = 3.18 mm) in water in a contact-load-slide-liftoff motion (105 cycles). The wear scar was analysed using profilometry and the volume loss was digitally computed. Finally, all specimens were loaded (fatigued specimens with their worn surface loaded in tension) until fracture in a biaxial flexure apparatus. The differences in volume loss and flexural strength were determined using regression analysis.
Compared to AP and FS, ES and LU showed a significantly lower volume loss (p < 0.05). Non-fatigued ES specimens had a similar flexural strength compared to nonfatigued AP, while non-fatigued FS and LU specimens had a lower flexural strength (p < 0.001; 95 %CI: -80.0 - 51.8). The fatigue test resulted in a significant decrease of the flexural strength of ES specimens, only (p < 0.001; 95 %CI: -96.1 - -54.6).
These outcomes concur with the outcomes of clinical studies on the longevity of these composites in patients with tooth wear. Therefore, the employed laboratory test seems to have the potential to test materials in a clinically relevant way.
本研究旨在复制并翻译体外临床表现,并评估机械性能(弯曲强度、抗疲劳性、耐磨性)的实验室结果,并将其与 Radboud 牙齿磨损项目(RTWP)中使用的材料的临床结果联系起来。
选择了四种牙科树脂复合材料。为每个 Clearfil TM AP-X(AP)、Filtek TM Supreme XTE(FS)、Estenia TM C&B(ES)和 Lava Ultimate(LU)制作了 30 个直径为 12.0 毫米、厚度为 1.2 毫米的圆盘。使用球形滑石压头(r = 3.18 毫米)在水中以接触-负载-滑动-抬起的运动方式(105 个循环)向每组 15 个试件施加同心循环载荷(200N,2Hz 频率)。使用轮廓仪分析磨损痕迹,并通过数字计算体积损失。最后,在双轴弯曲装置中,将所有试件加载(使磨损表面加载在张力下的疲劳试件)直至断裂。使用回归分析确定体积损失和弯曲强度的差异。
与 AP 和 FS 相比,ES 和 LU 的体积损失明显较低(p<0.05)。未疲劳的 ES 试件的弯曲强度与未疲劳的 AP 相似,而未疲劳的 FS 和 LU 试件的弯曲强度较低(p<0.001;95%CI:-80.0-51.8)。疲劳试验导致 ES 试件的弯曲强度显著降低,仅(p<0.001;95%CI:-96.1-54.6)。
这些结果与这些复合材料在牙齿磨损患者中耐用性的临床研究结果一致。因此,所采用的实验室测试似乎有可能以临床相关的方式测试材料。