Knežević Martina
Department of Psychology, Catholic University of Croatia, Ilica 242, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia.
Brain Sci. 2024 May 24;14(6):536. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14060536.
In the present study, we aimed to investigate the neural dynamics of interference control using event-related potentials (ERPs) to reveal time course of interference control from the beginning to the end of young adulthood. Three groups of participants aged 19-21, 23-27 and 28-44 performed a Stroop task. The results revealed age differences in both accuracy and ERP amplitudes during all aspects of interreference control processing that reflect selective attention (P2), conflict monitoring (N2), conflict evaluation (P3) and interference control (N450). Both younger groups made more errors on incongruent trials compared to participants in their early 30s. The presence of higher P2 and N2 amplitudes, diminished P3 and again higher N450 amplitudes in participants in their early 20s points to a shortage of available resources for top-down control at this age. These results are in accordance with structural and functional studies that show that development of the frontoparietal network, which underlies interference control, continues after adolescence. While brain mechanisms are still developing, the use of accompanying cognitive abilities is still not optimal. The findings that change in neural dynamics and related performance continues into early adulthood challenge current models of cognitive development and call for new directions in developmental theorizing.
在本研究中,我们旨在利用事件相关电位(ERP)来研究干扰控制的神经动力学,以揭示从青年期开始到结束时干扰控制的时间进程。三组年龄分别为19 - 21岁、23 - 27岁和28 - 44岁的参与者完成了一项Stroop任务。结果显示,在反映选择性注意(P2)、冲突监测(N2)、冲突评估(P3)和干扰控制(N450)的干扰控制处理的各个方面,年龄差异体现在准确性和ERP波幅上。与30岁出头的参与者相比,较年轻的两组在不一致试验中犯的错误更多。20岁出头的参与者中较高的P2和N2波幅、降低的P3波幅以及再次升高的N450波幅表明,这个年龄段自上而下控制的可用资源不足。这些结果与结构和功能研究一致,这些研究表明,作为干扰控制基础的额顶网络在青春期后仍在继续发育。虽然大脑机制仍在发展,但伴随认知能力的使用仍未达到最佳状态。神经动力学变化及相关表现持续到成年早期这一发现,挑战了当前的认知发展模型,并呼吁在发展理论化方面有新的方向。