Suppr超能文献

比较近端吻合器与 Dermalon 皮肤缝合器的长期美容效果。

Long-term cosmetic results comparing Proximate stapler with Dermalon skin closure.

作者信息

Nilsson T, Frimodt-Møller C, Jeppesen N

出版信息

Ann Chir Gynaecol. 1985;74(1):30-1.

PMID:3893308
Abstract

Sixteen patients having had an aorto-femoral bifurcation bypass performed were allocated at random for having their right inguinal incisions sutured with staplers and the left incisions with monofilament nylon sutures or vice versa. Long-term follow-up (11 months) demonstrated no differences in the appearance of the scars. The only advantage of the stapler is the short duration of skin-closure as compared to the sutured wounds. Since the long-term cosmetic results are equal and the cost price of the staplers are far higher than sutures we cannot recommend staplers for skin closure in routine operations.

摘要

16例行主动脉-股动脉分叉搭桥术的患者被随机分配,右侧腹股沟切口用吻合器缝合,左侧切口用单丝尼龙缝线缝合,或反之。长期随访(11个月)显示,瘢痕外观无差异。吻合器的唯一优点是与缝合伤口相比,皮肤闭合时间短。由于长期美容效果相同,且吻合器的成本价格远高于缝线,因此我们不建议在常规手术中使用吻合器进行皮肤闭合。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验