Suppr超能文献

腹部伤口缝合:吻合器与缝线的比较

Abdominal wound closure comparing the proximate stapler with sutures.

作者信息

Lubowski D, Hunt D

出版信息

Aust N Z J Surg. 1985 Aug;55(4):405-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.1985.tb00910.x.

Abstract

Proximate staple closure of transverse and vertical abdominal wounds is compared with suture closure in a prospective, blind, randomized trial. Fifty-seven wounds were randomly allocated to 3/0 Prolene or Proximate staple closure. Each wound was photographed after removal of staples or sutures and again in the sixth postoperative week. The photographic slides were independently assessed by eight observers, who graded the cosmetic result of each wound on a scale from 1 to 10. The cosmetic score in transverse wounds closed with sub-cuticular sutures was better than with staples. Cosmetic scores in vertical wounds were almost equal for staples and sutures. Staple closure was faster than suture closure. Proximate staple closure is considered a suitable and faster method for vertical abdominal wounds.

摘要

在一项前瞻性、盲法、随机试验中,对腹部横切口和纵切口伤口的近端吻合器闭合与缝线缝合进行了比较。57个伤口被随机分配接受3/0普理灵缝线或近端吻合器闭合。在拆除吻合钉或缝线后以及术后第六周分别对每个伤口进行拍照。八名观察者独立评估这些照片幻灯片,他们根据1至10分的评分标准对每个伤口的美容效果进行评分。皮下缝线缝合的横切口伤口的美容评分优于吻合器闭合。纵切口伤口使用吻合器和缝线的美容评分几乎相等。吻合器闭合比缝线缝合更快。近端吻合器闭合被认为是腹部纵切口伤口一种合适且更快的方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验