Sovacool Benjamin K
Department of Earth and Environment, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Institute for Global Sustainability, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Risk Anal. 2025 Jan;45(1):78-107. doi: 10.1111/risa.14667. Epub 2024 Jun 29.
As countries and communities grapple with climate change, they seek to rapidly decarbonize their economies and cultures. A low-carbon future will likely depend on more distributed solar energy, the electrification of mobility, and more efficient homes and buildings. But what emergent risks are evident within this low-carbon society? This exploratory study first reviews the existing literature to identify 75 risk-risk tradeoffs by their category, medium of distribution, and type. It builds on these 75 examples to apply a typology of Risk Offsets, Risk Substitution, Risk Transfer, and Risk Transformation. Based on extensive document analysis, it applies that typology to three low-carbon innovations: solar energy, battery electric vehicles, and building energy efficiency retrofits, identifying 36 distinct risk-risk tradeoffs in total. As such, the paper moves to discuss complexities and challenges in risk management. In doing so, it calls for a more refined risk assessment that better accounts for decision-making considerations such as the magnitude or probability of risk, size of population exposed, certainty in risk estimation, severity of adverse outcome, distributional considerations, and the timing of risk impacts. It also summarizes emergent research gaps. Risk management in the context of climate action becomes a three-dimensional chess game of weighing risk transmission, risk mediums, and risk categories.
随着各国和社区应对气候变化,它们试图迅速实现经济和文化的脱碳。低碳未来可能依赖于更多分布式太阳能、交通电气化以及更高效的家庭和建筑。但在这个低碳社会中,有哪些明显的新出现的风险呢?这项探索性研究首先回顾现有文献,按类别、分布媒介和类型确定75种风险-风险权衡。它以这75个例子为基础,应用风险抵消、风险替代、风险转移和风险转化的类型学。基于广泛的文献分析,它将该类型学应用于三项低碳创新:太阳能、电池电动汽车和建筑能效改造,总共识别出36种不同的风险-风险权衡。因此,本文进而讨论风险管理中的复杂性和挑战。在此过程中,它呼吁进行更精细的风险评估,更好地考虑决策因素,如风险的大小或概率、受影响人群的规模、风险估计的确定性、不良后果的严重程度、分布考虑因素以及风险影响的时间。它还总结了新出现的研究空白。气候行动背景下的风险管理变成了一场权衡风险传播、风险媒介和风险类别的三维棋局。