• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

由于先前的预期,目标物品的估值会被吸引到无法获得的诱饵物品上。

Valuations of target items are drawn towards unavailable decoy items due to prior expectations.

作者信息

Izakson Liz, Yoo Minhee, Hakim Adam, Krajbich Ian, Webb Ryan, Levy Dino J

机构信息

Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, P.O. Box 39040, Tel Aviv 6997801, Israel.

Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, 1835 Neil Avenue, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.

出版信息

PNAS Nexus. 2024 Jun 24;3(7):pgae232. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae232. eCollection 2024 Jul.

DOI:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae232
PMID:38948017
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11214102/
Abstract

When people make choices, the items they consider are often embedded in a context (of other items). How this context affects the valuation of the specific item is an important question. High-value context might make items appear less attractive because of contrast-the tendency to normalize perception of an object relative to its background-or more attractive because of assimilation-the tendency to group objects together. Alternatively, a high-value context might increase prior expectations about the item's value. Here, we investigated these possibilities. We examined how unavailable context items affect choices between two target items, as well as the willingness-to-pay for single targets. Participants viewed sets of three items for several seconds before the target(s) were highlighted. In both tasks, we found a significant assimilation-like effect where participants were more likely to choose or place a higher value on a target when it was surrounded by higher-value context. However, these context effects were only significant for participants' fastest choices. Using variants of a drift-diffusion model, we established that the unavailable context shifted participants' prior expectations towards the average values of the sets but had an inconclusive effect on their evaluations of the targets during the decision (i.e. drift rates). In summary, we find that people use context to inform their initial valuations. This can improve efficiency by allowing people to get a head start on their decision. However, it also means that the valuation of an item can change depending on the context.

摘要

当人们做出选择时,他们所考虑的选项通常嵌入在(其他选项的)情境之中。这种情境如何影响特定选项的估值是一个重要问题。高价值情境可能会因对比(即相对于背景使物体感知趋于正常化的倾向)而使选项显得吸引力降低,或者因同化(即将物体归为一组的倾向)而使其更具吸引力。或者,高价值情境可能会提高对该选项价值的先前期望。在此,我们对这些可能性进行了研究。我们考察了不可用的情境选项如何影响两个目标选项之间的选择,以及对单个目标的支付意愿。在突出显示目标选项之前,参与者会先浏览一组三个选项几秒钟。在这两项任务中,我们都发现了一种显著的类似同化的效应,即当目标选项被更高价值的情境所包围时,参与者更有可能选择该目标或对其赋予更高价值。然而,这些情境效应仅在参与者最快做出的选择中显著。使用漂移扩散模型的变体,我们确定不可用的情境使参与者的先前期望向选项集的平均值偏移,但对他们在决策过程中对目标的评估(即漂移率)影响不明确。总之,我们发现人们利用情境来形成他们的初始估值。这可以通过让人们在决策时抢占先机来提高效率。然而,这也意味着一个选项的估值可能会因情境而异。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c2e/11214102/8bd5087d9a72/pgae232f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c2e/11214102/a022bb082805/pgae232f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c2e/11214102/3a38e5d88ddd/pgae232f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c2e/11214102/4d6ded7a466a/pgae232f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c2e/11214102/ea6cc651c8bb/pgae232f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c2e/11214102/8bd5087d9a72/pgae232f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c2e/11214102/a022bb082805/pgae232f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c2e/11214102/3a38e5d88ddd/pgae232f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c2e/11214102/4d6ded7a466a/pgae232f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c2e/11214102/ea6cc651c8bb/pgae232f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7c2e/11214102/8bd5087d9a72/pgae232f5.jpg

相似文献

1
Valuations of target items are drawn towards unavailable decoy items due to prior expectations.由于先前的预期,目标物品的估值会被吸引到无法获得的诱饵物品上。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Jun 24;3(7):pgae232. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae232. eCollection 2024 Jul.
2
Why Do Irrelevant Alternatives Matter? An fMRI-TMS Study of Context-Dependent Preferences.为何无关选项至关重要?一项关于情境依赖偏好的功能磁共振成像-经颅磁刺激研究。
J Neurosci. 2017 Nov 29;37(48):11647-11661. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2307-16.2017. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
3
Uncovering the computational mechanisms underlying many-alternative choice.揭示多选项选择背后的计算机制。
Elife. 2021 Apr 6;10:e57012. doi: 10.7554/eLife.57012.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Exploring the influence of ownership history on object valuation in typical development and autism.探究所有权历史对典型发展和自闭症中物体估值的影响。
Cognition. 2020 Apr;197:104187. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2020.104187. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
6
Neural correlates of economic value and valuation context: an event-related potential study.经济价值与估值背景的神经关联:一项事件相关电位研究。
J Neurophysiol. 2018 May 1;119(5):1924-1933. doi: 10.1152/jn.00524.2017. Epub 2018 Feb 14.
7
Macromolecular crowding: chemistry and physics meet biology (Ascona, Switzerland, 10-14 June 2012).大分子拥挤现象:化学与物理邂逅生物学(瑞士阿斯科纳,2012年6月10日至14日)
Phys Biol. 2013 Aug;10(4):040301. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/10/4/040301. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
8
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
9
Impact of question order on prioritisation of outcomes in the development of a core outcome set: a randomised controlled trial.问题顺序对核心结局集制定中结局优先级的影响:一项随机对照试验
Trials. 2018 Jan 25;19(1):66. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2405-6.
10
Attention! Can choices for low value food over high value food be trained?注意!是否可以通过训练来选择低价值食物而不是高价值食物?
Appetite. 2018 May 1;124:124-132. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.06.010. Epub 2017 Jun 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Parameter estimation of hyper-spherical diffusion models with a time-dependent threshold: An integral equation method.具有时间相关阈值的超球形扩散模型的参数估计:一种积分方程方法。
Behav Res Methods. 2025 Sep 10;57(10):283. doi: 10.3758/s13428-025-02810-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Clarifying the role of an unavailable distractor in human multiattribute choice.阐明不可用干扰项在人类多属性选择中的作用。
Elife. 2022 Dec 6;11:e83316. doi: 10.7554/eLife.83316.
2
Computational mechanisms for context-based behavioral interventions: A large-scale analysis.基于情境的行为干预的计算机制:大规模分析。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Apr 12;119(15):e2114914119. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2114914119. Epub 2022 Apr 4.
3
Decomposing preferences into predispositions and evaluations.将偏好分解为倾向和评估。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Aug;151(8):1883-1903. doi: 10.1037/xge0001162. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
4
The case against economic values in the orbitofrontal cortex (or anywhere else in the brain).反对眶额皮质(或大脑其他任何区域)存在经济价值的观点。
Behav Neurosci. 2021 Apr;135(2):192-201. doi: 10.1037/bne0000448.
5
Reply to: Divisive normalization does influence decisions with multiple alternatives.回复:归一化分割确实会影响具有多个备选方案的决策。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Nov;4(11):1121-1123. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-00942-4. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
6
Divisive normalization does influence decisions with multiple alternatives.归一化除法确实会影响涉及多个选项的决策。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Nov;4(11):1118-1120. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-00941-5. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
7
Consistent patterns of distractor effects during decision making.在决策过程中存在一致的分心效应模式。
Elife. 2020 Jul 6;9:e53850. doi: 10.7554/eLife.53850.
8
A distributional and dynamic theory of pricing and preference.一种关于定价和偏好的分布动态理论。
Psychol Rev. 2020 Nov;127(6):1053-1078. doi: 10.1037/rev0000215. Epub 2020 May 28.
9
Value-based attention but not divisive normalization influences decisions with multiple alternatives.基于价值的注意力而非分歧归一化影响具有多个备选方案的决策。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Jun;4(6):634-645. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0822-0. Epub 2020 Feb 3.
10
Evidence accumulation is biased by motivation: A computational account.证据积累受到动机的偏向:一种计算解释。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 Jun 27;15(6):e1007089. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007089. eCollection 2019 Jun.