Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, and Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts (J.P., J.G.Y.).
Department of Population Medicine, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care Institute, Boston, Massachusetts (H.Y., S.L.R.-S., P.-I.D.L., S.T., J.P.B.).
Ann Intern Med. 2024 Aug;177(8):993-1003. doi: 10.7326/M23-2742. Epub 2024 Jul 2.
Antidepressants are among the most commonly prescribed medications, but evidence on comparative weight change for specific first-line treatments is limited.
To compare weight change across common first-line antidepressant treatments by emulating a target trial.
Observational cohort study over 24 months.
Electronic health record (EHR) data from 2010 to 2019 across 8 U.S. health systems.
183 118 patients.
Prescription data determined initiation of treatment with sertraline, citalopram, escitalopram, fluoxetine, paroxetine, bupropion, duloxetine, or venlafaxine. The investigators estimated the population-level effects of initiating each treatment, relative to sertraline, on mean weight change (primary) and the probability of gaining at least 5% of baseline weight (secondary) 6 months after initiation. Inverse probability weighting of repeated outcome marginal structural models was used to account for baseline confounding and informative outcome measurement. In secondary analyses, the effects of initiating and adhering to each treatment protocol were estimated.
Compared with that for sertraline, estimated 6-month weight gain was higher for escitalopram (difference, 0.41 kg [95% CI, 0.31 to 0.52 kg]), paroxetine (difference, 0.37 kg [CI, 0.20 to 0.54 kg]), duloxetine (difference, 0.34 kg [CI, 0.22 to 0.44 kg]), venlafaxine (difference, 0.17 kg [CI, 0.03 to 0.31 kg]), and citalopram (difference, 0.12 kg [CI, 0.02 to 0.23 kg]); similar for fluoxetine (difference, -0.07 kg [CI, -0.19 to 0.04 kg]); and lower for bupropion (difference, -0.22 kg [CI, -0.33 to -0.12 kg]). Escitalopram, paroxetine, and duloxetine were associated with 10% to 15% higher risk for gaining at least 5% of baseline weight, whereas bupropion was associated with 15% reduced risk. When the effects of initiation and adherence were estimated, associations were stronger but had wider CIs. Six-month adherence ranged from 28% (duloxetine) to 41% (bupropion).
No data on medication dispensing, low medication adherence, incomplete data on adherence, and incomplete data on weight measures across time points.
Small differences in mean weight change were found between 8 first-line antidepressants, with bupropion consistently showing the least weight gain, although adherence to medications over follow-up was low. Clinicians could consider potential weight gain when initiating antidepressant treatment.
National Institutes of Health.
抗抑郁药是最常开的药物之一,但关于特定一线治疗药物的体重变化的证据有限。
通过模拟目标试验比较常见一线抗抑郁药治疗的体重变化。
在 24 个月内进行观察性队列研究。
来自 2010 年至 2019 年美国 8 个医疗系统的电子健康记录(EHR)数据。
183118 名患者。
处方数据确定了舍曲林、西酞普兰、艾司西酞普兰、氟西汀、帕罗西汀、安非他酮、度洛西汀或文拉法辛的治疗开始。研究人员估计了相对于舍曲林,每种治疗开始时对体重变化(主要)和开始后 6 个月体重至少增加基线体重的 5%(次要)的人群水平影响。使用重复结局边际结构模型的逆概率加权来考虑基线混杂因素和信息性结局测量。在二次分析中,估计了开始和坚持每个治疗方案的效果。
与舍曲林相比,艾司西酞普兰(差值,0.41kg[95%CI,0.31 至 0.52kg])、帕罗西汀(差值,0.37kg[CI,0.20 至 0.54kg])、度洛西汀(差值,0.34kg[CI,0.22 至 0.44kg])、文拉法辛(差值,0.17kg[CI,0.03 至 0.31kg])和西酞普兰(差值,0.12kg[CI,0.02 至 0.23kg])的 6 个月体重增加较高;氟西汀(差值,-0.07kg[CI,-0.19 至 0.04kg])相似;而安非他酮(差值,-0.22kg[CI,-0.33 至-0.12kg])则较低。艾司西酞普兰、帕罗西汀和度洛西汀与体重至少增加基线体重的 10%至 15%的风险增加有关,而安非他酮则与风险降低 15%有关。当估计开始和坚持的效果时,关联更强,但置信区间较宽。6 个月的依从性范围从 28%(度洛西汀)到 41%(安非他酮)。
没有关于药物配给、低药物依从性、药物依从性不完全的数据以及各时间点体重测量数据不完整的信息。
在 8 种一线抗抑郁药之间发现了平均体重变化的微小差异,虽然在随访过程中坚持用药的比例较低,但安非他酮的体重增加最少。临床医生在开始抗抑郁治疗时可以考虑潜在的体重增加。
美国国立卫生研究院。