Parvizi Kourosh, Menya Diana, Nix Emily, Mangeni Judith, Lorenzetti Federico, Sang Edna, Anderson de Cuevas Rachel, Tawiah Theresa, Baame Miranda, Betang Emmanuel, Ronzi Sara, Twumasi Mieks, Amenga-Etego Seeba, Quansah Reginald, Mbatchou Ngahane Bertrand Hugo, Puzzolo Elisa, Asante Kwaku Poku, Pope Daniel, Shupler Matthew
Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom.
School of Public Health, Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya.
Energy Nexus. 2024 Jul;14:None. doi: 10.1016/j.nexus.2024.100304.
Liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) is a clean cooking fuel that emits less household air pollution (HAP) than polluting cooking fuels (e.g. charcoal, wood). While switching from polluting fuels to LPG can reduce HAP and improve health, the impact of 'stacking' (concurrent use of polluting fuels and LPG) on adverse health symptoms (e.g. headaches, eye irritation, cough) among female cooks is uncertain.
Survey data from the CLEAN-Air(Africa) study was collected on cooking patterns and health symptoms over the last 12 months (cough, wheezing, chest tightness, shortness of breath, eye irritation, headaches) from approximately 400 female primary cooks in each of three peri‑urban communities in sub-Saharan Africa: Mbalmayo, Cameroon; Obuasi, Ghana; and Eldoret, Kenya. Random effects Poisson regression, adjusted for socioeconomic and health-related covariates, assessed the relationship between primary and secondary cooking fuel type and self-reported health symptoms.
Among 1,147 participants, 10 % ( = 118) exclusively cooked with LPG, 45 % ( = 509) stacked LPG and polluting fuels and 45 % ( = 520) exclusively cooked with polluting fuels. Female cooks stacking LPG and polluting fuels had significantly higher odds of shortness of breath (OR 2.16, 95 %CI:1.04-4.48) compared with those exclusively using LPG. In two communities, headache prevalence was 30 % higher among women stacking LPG with polluting fuels (Mbalmayo:82 %; Eldoret:65 %) compared with those exclusively using LPG (Mbalmayo:53 %; Eldoret:33 %). Women stacking LPG and polluting fuels (OR 2.45, 95 %CI:1.29-4.67) had significantly higher odds of eye irritation than women cooking exclusively with LPG. Second-hand smoke exposure was significantly associated with higher odds of chest tightness (OR 1.92, 95 % CI:1.19-3.11), wheezing (OR 1.76, 95 % CI:1.06-2.91) and cough (OR 1.78, 95 %CI:1.13-2.80).
In peri‑urban sub-Saharan Africa, women exclusively cooking with LPG had lower odds of several health symptoms than those stacking LPG and polluting fuels. Promoting a complete transition to LPG in these communities may likely generate short-term health benefits for primary cooks.
液化石油气(LPG)是一种清洁的烹饪燃料,与污染性烹饪燃料(如木炭、木材)相比,其产生的家庭空气污染(HAP)更少。虽然从污染性燃料改用LPG可以减少HAP并改善健康状况,但“叠加使用”(同时使用污染性燃料和LPG)对女性厨师不良健康症状(如头痛、眼睛刺激、咳嗽)的影响尚不确定。
来自“清洁空气(非洲)”研究的调查数据收集了撒哈拉以南非洲三个城郊社区(喀麦隆的姆巴尔马约、加纳的奥布阿西和肯尼亚的埃尔多雷特)中约400名女性主要厨师在过去12个月的烹饪模式和健康症状(咳嗽、喘息、胸闷、呼吸急促、眼睛刺激、头痛)。采用随机效应泊松回归,并对社会经济和健康相关协变量进行调整,评估主要和次要烹饪燃料类型与自我报告的健康症状之间的关系。
在1147名参与者中,10%(=118)仅使用LPG烹饪,45%(=509)叠加使用LPG和污染性燃料,45%(=520)仅使用污染性燃料烹饪。与仅使用LPG的女性厨师相比,叠加使用LPG和污染性燃料的女性厨师呼吸急促的几率显著更高(比值比2.16,95%置信区间:1.04 - 4.48)。在两个社区中,叠加使用LPG和污染性燃料的女性头痛患病率比仅使用LPG的女性高30%(姆巴尔马约:82%;埃尔多雷特:65%)(姆巴尔马约:53%;埃尔多雷特:33%)。叠加使用LPG和污染性燃料的女性(比值比2.45,95%置信区间:1.29 - 4.67)眼睛受刺激的几率比仅使用LPG烹饪的女性显著更高。二手烟暴露与胸闷几率更高(比值比1.92,95%置信区间:1.19 - 3.11)、喘息(比值比1.76,95%置信区间:1.06 - 2.91)和咳嗽(比值比1.78,95%置信区间:1.13 - 2.80)显著相关。
在撒哈拉以南非洲的城郊地区,仅使用LPG烹饪的女性出现多种健康症状的几率低于叠加使用LPG和污染性燃料的女性。在这些社区促进向LPG的完全过渡可能会为主要厨师带来短期健康益处。