Suppr超能文献

压疮的局部治疗。Varidase与氧化锌的随机对照试验。

Topical treatment of pressure ulcers. A randomized comparative trial of Varidase and zinc oxide.

作者信息

Agren M S, Strömberg H E

出版信息

Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg. 1985;19(1):97-100. doi: 10.3109/02844318509052871.

Abstract

In a single-blind, randomized trial, the efficacy of topical streptokinase-streptodornase (Varidase) solution was compared with that of zinc oxide on necrotic pressure ulcers in 28 patients. The effectiveness was determined by measuring the necrosis removal within 8 weeks. This occurred in 6 patients (43%) treated with Varidase and in 7 (50%) treated with zinc oxide. The statistical tests applied showed no significant difference between the two treatments despite the use of a high power (1-beta = 0.95). The data suggest that the two regimens are about equally effective in the treatment of necrotic tissue.

摘要

在一项单盲随机试验中,对28例坏死性压疮患者比较了局部用链激酶-链道酶(Varidase)溶液与氧化锌的疗效。通过测量8周内坏死组织的清除情况来确定疗效。接受Varidase治疗的6例患者(43%)和接受氧化锌治疗的7例患者(50%)出现了坏死组织清除。尽管使用了较高的检验效能(1-β=0.95),但应用的统计学检验显示两种治疗方法之间无显著差异。数据表明,两种治疗方案在治疗坏死组织方面的效果大致相同。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验