Mijancos-Martínez Gema, Bachiller Alejandro, Fernández-Linsenbarth Inés, Romero Sergio, Serna Leidy Y, Molina Vicente, Mañanas Miguel Ángel
Biomedical Engineering Research Centre (CREB), Department of Automatic Control (ESAII), Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya - BarcelonaTech (UPC), Barcelona, Spain.
Institute of Research Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain.
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2025 Apr;275(3):785-797. doi: 10.1007/s00406-024-01859-z. Epub 2024 Jul 6.
Transcranial magnetic stimulation and electroencephalography (TMS-EEG) recordings are crucial to directly assess cortical excitability and inhibition in a non-invasive and task-free manner. TMS-EEG signals are characterized by TMS-evoked potentials (TEPs), which are employed to evaluate cortical function. Nonetheless, different time windows (TW) have been used to compute them over the years. Moreover, these TWs tend to be the same for all participants omitting the intersubject variability. Therefore, the objective of this study is to assess the effect of using different TWs to compute the TEPs, moving from a common fixed TW to more adaptive individualized TWs. Twenty-nine healthy (HC) controls and twenty schizophrenia patients (SCZ) underwent single-pulse (SP) TMS-EEG protocol. Firstly, only the HC were considered to evaluate the TEPs for three different TWs in terms of amplitude and topographical distribution. Secondly, the SCZ patients were included to determine which TW is better to characterize the brain alterations of SCZ. The results indicate that a more individualized TW provides a better characterization of the SP TMS-EEG signals, although all of them show the same tendency. Regarding the comparison between groups, the individualized TW is the one that provides a better differentiation between populations. They also provide further support to the possible imbalance of cortical excitability/inhibition in the SCZ population due to its reduced activity in the N45 TEP and greater amplitude values in the N100. Results also suggest that the SCZ brain has a baseline hyperactive state since the TEPs of the SCZ appear earlier than those of the HC.
经颅磁刺激和脑电图(TMS - EEG)记录对于以非侵入性且无任务的方式直接评估皮层兴奋性和抑制作用至关重要。TMS - EEG信号以TMS诱发电位(TEP)为特征,这些电位用于评估皮层功能。然而,多年来人们使用了不同的时间窗(TW)来计算TEP。此外,这些时间窗对所有参与者往往都是相同的,忽略了个体间的变异性。因此,本研究的目的是评估使用不同时间窗来计算TEP的效果,从常见的固定时间窗转向更具适应性的个体化时间窗。29名健康(HC)对照者和20名精神分裂症患者(SCZ)接受了单脉冲(SP)TMS - EEG方案。首先,仅考虑HC,从幅度和地形分布方面评估三种不同时间窗下的TEP。其次,纳入SCZ患者以确定哪种时间窗更能表征SCZ的脑改变。结果表明,尽管所有时间窗都呈现相同趋势,但更个体化的时间窗能更好地表征SP TMS - EEG信号。关于组间比较,个体化时间窗能更好地区分不同人群。它们还进一步支持了SCZ人群中皮层兴奋性/抑制可能存在失衡的观点,因为其在N45 TEP中的活动降低且N100中的幅度值更大。结果还表明,SCZ大脑存在基线多动状态,因为SCZ的TEP比HC的出现得更早。