Center for Mind/Brain Sciences - CIMeC, University of Trento, Rovereto, TN, Italy; Neurophysiology lab, IRCCS Istituto Centro San Giovanni di Dio Fatebenefratelli, Via Pilastroni 4, 25125 Brescia, Italy.
Center for Mind/Brain Sciences - CIMeC, University of Trento, Rovereto, TN, Italy.
Neuroimage. 2021 Oct 1;239:118272. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118272. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS)-evoked potentials (TEPs) allow one to assess cortical excitability and effective connectivity in clinical and basic research. However, obtaining clean TEPs is challenging due to the various TMS-related artifacts that contaminate the electroencephalographic (EEG) signal when the TMS pulse is delivered. Different preprocessing approaches have been employed to remove the artifacts, but the degree of artifact reduction or signal distortion introduced in this phase of analysis is still unknown. Knowing and controlling this potential source of uncertainty will increase the inter-rater reliability of TEPs and improve the comparability between TMS-EEG studies. The goal of this study was to assess the variability in TEP waveforms due to of the use of different preprocessing pipelines. To accomplish this aim, we preprocessed the same TMS-EEG data with four different pipelines and compared the results. The dataset was obtained from 16 subjects in two identical recording sessions, each session consisting of both left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and left inferior parietal lobule stimulation at 100% of the resting motor threshold. Considerable differences in TEP amplitudes and global mean field power (GMFP) were found between the preprocessing pipelines. Topographies of TEPs from the different pipelines were all highly correlated (ρ>0.8) at latencies over 100 ms. By contrast, waveforms at latencies under 100 ms showed a variable level of correlation, with ρ ranging between 0.2 and 0.9. Moreover, the test-retest reliability of TEPs depended on the preprocessing pipeline. Taken together, these results take us to suggest that the choice of the preprocessing approach has a marked impact on the final TEP, and that further studies are needed to understand advantages and disadvantages of the different approaches.
经颅磁刺激(TMS)诱发电位(TEP)可用于评估皮质兴奋性和有效连接,这在临床和基础研究中都有重要作用。然而,由于 TMS 脉冲传输时会产生各种与 TMS 相关的伪迹,因此获取干净的 TEP 是一项挑战。已经采用了不同的预处理方法来去除伪迹,但在分析的这一阶段引入的伪迹减少程度或信号失真程度仍然未知。了解和控制这一潜在的不确定来源将提高 TEP 的评分者间可靠性,并提高 TMS-EEG 研究之间的可比性。本研究的目的是评估由于使用不同的预处理管道而导致的 TEP 波形的可变性。为了实现这一目标,我们使用四个不同的管道对相同的 TMS-EEG 数据进行了预处理,并比较了结果。该数据集来自 16 名受试者的两个相同记录会话,每个会话均在左背外侧前额叶皮层和左顶下小叶以 100%静息运动阈值刺激。在预处理管道之间发现 TEP 幅度和全局平均场功率(GMFP)存在相当大的差异。不同管道的 TEP 地形图在 100 毫秒以上的潜伏期高度相关(ρ>0.8)。相比之下,潜伏期在 100 毫秒以下的波形表现出不同程度的相关性,ρ 值在 0.2 到 0.9 之间。此外,TEP 的测试-重测可靠性取决于预处理管道。总之,这些结果表明预处理方法的选择对最终的 TEP 有显著影响,需要进一步研究以了解不同方法的优缺点。