• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

行人使用预估碰撞时间与电动滑板车时的安全情况。

Pedestrians' safety using projected time-to-collision to electric scooters.

作者信息

Jafari Alireza, Liu Yen-Chen

机构信息

Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, No. 1, Dasyue Rd, East District, Tainan, Taiwan.

出版信息

Nat Commun. 2024 Jul 7;15(1):5701. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-50049-x.

DOI:10.1038/s41467-024-50049-x
PMID:38972895
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11228023/
Abstract

Safety concern among electric scooter riders drives them onto sidewalks, endangering pedestrians and making them uncomfortable. Regulators' solutions are inconsistent and conflicting worldwide. Widely accepted pedestrian safety metrics may lead to converging solutions. Adapting the time-to-collision from car traffic safety, we define projected time-to-collision and experimentally study pedestrians' objective and subjective safety. We design isolated and crowd experiments using e-scooter-to-pedestrian interactions to assess the impact of various factors on objective safety. In addition, we conducted a pedestrian survey to relate the subjective safety and the metric. We report a strong correlation between subjective safety and the projected time-to-collision when agents face each other and no relation when the e-scooter overtakes a pedestrian. As a near-miss metric correlated with pedestrian comfort, projected time-to-collision is implementable in policy-making, urban architecture, and e-scooter design to enhance pedestrian safety.

摘要

电动滑板车骑行者的安全担忧促使他们驶上人行道,危及行人并让行人感到不适。全球范围内监管机构的解决方案不一致且相互冲突。广泛接受的行人安全指标可能会带来趋同的解决方案。借鉴汽车交通安全中的碰撞时间,我们定义了预计碰撞时间,并通过实验研究行人的客观和主观安全性。我们设计了使用电动滑板车与行人互动的孤立实验和人群实验,以评估各种因素对客观安全性的影响。此外,我们进行了一项行人调查,以关联主观安全性和该指标。我们报告称,当双方相向而行时,主观安全性与预计碰撞时间之间存在很强的相关性,而当电动滑板车超过行人时则不存在相关性。作为与行人舒适度相关的近碰撞指标,预计碰撞时间可应用于政策制定、城市建筑和电动滑板车设计中,以提高行人安全性。

相似文献

1
Pedestrians' safety using projected time-to-collision to electric scooters.行人使用预估碰撞时间与电动滑板车时的安全情况。
Nat Commun. 2024 Jul 7;15(1):5701. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-50049-x.
2
E-scooter riders and pedestrians: Attitudes and interactions in five countries.电动滑板车骑行者与行人:五个国家的态度与互动
Heliyon. 2023 Apr 11;9(4):e15449. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15449. eCollection 2023 Apr.
3
Sharing the sidewalk: A case of E-scooter related pedestrian injury.共享人行道:一起与电动滑板车相关的行人受伤案例。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Sep;37(9):1807.e5-1807.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.06.017. Epub 2019 Jun 8.
4
Comparing the risky behaviours of shared and private e-scooter and bicycle riders in downtown Brisbane, Australia.比较澳大利亚布里斯班市中心共享和私人电动滑板车和自行车骑手的危险行为。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Mar;152:105981. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.105981. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
5
Pedestrian-driver communication and decision strategies at marked crossings.行人-驾驶员在有标记的交叉口的沟通和决策策略。
Accid Anal Prev. 2017 May;102:41-50. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.02.018.
6
How do drivers overtake pedestrians? Evidence from field test and naturalistic driving data.驾驶员如何超越行人?来自现场测试和自然驾驶数据的证据。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 May;139:105494. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105494. Epub 2020 Mar 20.
7
Modeling pedestrian behavior in pedestrian-vehicle near misses: A continuous Gaussian Process Inverse Reinforcement Learning (GP-IRL) approach.建模行人和车辆近距离碰撞中的行人行为:一种连续高斯过程逆向强化学习 (GP-IRL) 方法。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Oct;161:106355. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106355. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
8
The role of perceived pedestrian safety on designing safer built environments.感知行人安全在设计更安全的建成环境中的作用。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2020 Oct 12;21(sup1):S84-S89. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2020.1812062. Epub 2020 Sep 14.
9
Have pedestrian subsystem tests improved passenger car front shape?行人子系统测试是否改善了乘用车前部形状?
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Jun;115:143-150. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.014. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
10
The mediating effect of traffic safety climate between pedestrian inconvenience and pedestrian behavior.行人性不便与行人性为间交通安全氛围的中介效应。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Oct;119:155-161. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.07.020. Epub 2018 Jul 19.

本文引用的文献

1
E-scooter riders and pedestrians: Attitudes and interactions in five countries.电动滑板车骑行者与行人:五个国家的态度与互动
Heliyon. 2023 Apr 11;9(4):e15449. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e15449. eCollection 2023 Apr.
2
How do different micro-mobility vehicles affect longitudinal control? Results from a field experiment.不同的微出行车辆如何影响纵向控制?一项实地实验的结果。
J Safety Res. 2023 Feb;84:24-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2022.10.005. Epub 2022 Oct 28.
3
A data-driven framework for the safe integration of micro-mobility into the transport system: Comparing bicycles and e-scooters in field trials.
一个基于数据的微型移动工具安全融入交通系统的框架:实地试验中对比自行车和电动滑板车。
J Safety Res. 2022 Jun;81:67-77. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2022.01.007. Epub 2022 Feb 8.
4
Crash test-based assessment of injury risks for adults and children when colliding with personal mobility devices and service robots.基于碰撞测试的成年人和儿童与个人移动设备和服务机器人碰撞时的伤害风险评估。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 28;12(1):5285. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09349-9.
5
Risk-taking behaviors of e-scooter users: A survey in Paris.电动滑板车使用者的冒险行为:巴黎的一项调查。
Accid Anal Prev. 2021 Dec;163:106427. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106427. Epub 2021 Oct 7.
6
Severity of e-scooter rider injuries associated with trip characteristics.电动滑板车骑手受伤严重程度与行程特征有关。
J Safety Res. 2021 Feb;76:256-261. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2020.12.016. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
7
Safety envelope of pedestrians upon motor vehicle conflicts identified via active avoidance behaviour.通过主动回避行为识别出机动车冲突中行人的安全范围。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 17;11(1):3996. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82331-z.
8
Computation of different optical variables of looming objects in pigeon nucleus rotundus neurons.鸽子圆核神经元中逼近物体的不同光学变量的计算
Nat Neurosci. 1998 Aug;1(4):296-303. doi: 10.1038/1110.