• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于碰撞测试的成年人和儿童与个人移动设备和服务机器人碰撞时的伤害风险评估。

Crash test-based assessment of injury risks for adults and children when colliding with personal mobility devices and service robots.

机构信息

Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne, EPFL, Institutes of Microengineering and Mechanical Engineering, 1015, Lausanne, Switzerland.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 28;12(1):5285. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09349-9.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-022-09349-9
PMID:35347216
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8960768/
Abstract

Autonomous mobility devices such as transport, cleaning, and delivery robots, hold a massive economic and social benefit. However, their deployment should not endanger bystanders, particularly vulnerable populations such as children and older adults who are inherently smaller and fragile. This study compared the risks faced by different pedestrian categories and determined risks through crash testing involving a service robot hitting an adult and a child dummy. Results of collisions at 3.1 m/s (11.1 km/h/6.9 mph) showed risks of serious head (14%), neck (20%), and chest (50%) injuries in children, and tibia fracture (33%) in adults. Furthermore, secondary impact analysis resulted in both populations at risk of severe head injuries, namely, from falling to the ground. Our data and simulations show mitigation strategies for reducing impact injury risks below 5% by either lowering the differential speed at impact below 1.5 m/s (5.4 km/h/3.3 mph) or through the usage of absorbent materials. The results presented herein may influence the design of controllers, sensing awareness, and assessment methods for robots and small vehicles standardization, as well as, policymaking and regulations for the speed, design, and usage of these devices in populated areas.

摘要

自主移动设备,如运输、清洁和送货机器人,具有巨大的经济和社会效益。然而,它们的部署不应该危及旁观者,特别是儿童和老年人等弱势群体,因为他们的身体更小、更脆弱。本研究比较了不同行人类别的风险,并通过涉及服务机器人撞击成人和儿童假人的碰撞测试来确定风险。以 3.1 m/s(11.1 km/h/6.9 mph)的速度碰撞的结果显示,儿童头部(14%)、颈部(20%)和胸部(50%)受伤以及成人胫骨骨折(33%)的风险较高。此外,二次撞击分析结果显示,这两个群体都有严重头部受伤的风险,即摔倒在地。我们的数据和模拟结果表明,可以通过将撞击时的差速降低到 1.5 m/s 以下(5.4 km/h/3.3 mph)或使用吸能材料,将撞击伤风险降低到 5%以下的缓解策略。本文所呈现的结果可能会影响机器人和小型车辆标准化的控制器设计、感知意识以及评估方法,以及这些设备在人口密集地区的速度、设计和使用的政策制定和法规。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95bd/8960768/d77c26996b58/41598_2022_9349_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95bd/8960768/c99444d111e3/41598_2022_9349_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95bd/8960768/3ac514b56322/41598_2022_9349_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95bd/8960768/62482b99fc95/41598_2022_9349_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95bd/8960768/15723fb96b5f/41598_2022_9349_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95bd/8960768/b4b2aa14fd26/41598_2022_9349_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95bd/8960768/d77c26996b58/41598_2022_9349_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95bd/8960768/c99444d111e3/41598_2022_9349_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95bd/8960768/3ac514b56322/41598_2022_9349_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95bd/8960768/62482b99fc95/41598_2022_9349_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95bd/8960768/15723fb96b5f/41598_2022_9349_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95bd/8960768/b4b2aa14fd26/41598_2022_9349_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/95bd/8960768/d77c26996b58/41598_2022_9349_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Crash test-based assessment of injury risks for adults and children when colliding with personal mobility devices and service robots.基于碰撞测试的成年人和儿童与个人移动设备和服务机器人碰撞时的伤害风险评估。
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 28;12(1):5285. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-09349-9.
2
Older Adults at Increased Risk as Pedestrians in Victoria, Australia: An Examination of Crash Characteristics and Injury Outcomes.澳大利亚维多利亚州老年行人面临更高风险:碰撞特征与受伤结果研究
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 2:S161-7. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1061662.
3
Detailed assessment of pedestrian ground contact injuries observed from in-depth accident data.详细评估从深入事故数据中观察到的行人地面接触伤害。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Jan;110:9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.10.011. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
4
The influence of vehicle front-end design on pedestrian ground impact.车辆前端设计对行人地面碰撞的影响。
Accid Anal Prev. 2015 Jun;79:56-69. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.03.009. Epub 2015 Mar 24.
5
Falling while walking: A hidden contributor to pedestrian injury.行走时摔倒:行人受伤的一个隐藏因素。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 May;114:77-82. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.01.010. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
6
Injury analysis of patients according to impact patterns involved in pedestrian traffic crashes.根据行人交通事故中的碰撞模式对患者进行损伤分析。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018 Feb 28;19(sup1):S153-S157. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1365142.
7
Numerical investigation of occupant injury risks in car-to-end terminal crashes using dummy-based injury criteria and vehicle-based crash severity metrics.基于假人损伤标准和车辆碰撞严重程度指标的汽车末端碰撞中乘员损伤风险的数值研究。
Accid Anal Prev. 2020 Sep;145:105700. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2020.105700. Epub 2020 Aug 7.
8
[The significance of the results of crash-tests with the use of the models of the pedestrians' lower extremities for the prevention of the traffic road accidents].[使用行人下肢模型进行碰撞测试结果对预防交通事故的意义]
Sud Med Ekspert. 2017;60(3):13-18. doi: 10.17116/sudmed201760313-18.
9
Have pedestrian subsystem tests improved passenger car front shape?行人子系统测试是否改善了乘用车前部形状?
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Jun;115:143-150. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2018.03.014. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
10
Severity of road crashes involving pedestrians in Metro Manila, Philippines.菲律宾马尼拉都会区涉及行人的道路交通事故严重程度。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Sep;94:216-26. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.06.006. Epub 2016 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Pedestrians' safety using projected time-to-collision to electric scooters.行人使用预估碰撞时间与电动滑板车时的安全情况。
Nat Commun. 2024 Jul 7;15(1):5701. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-50049-x.

本文引用的文献

1
Hospital Seeing More Personal Mobility Device Accidents and Serious Injuries Despite Active Mobility Act.尽管有《积极出行法案》,医院仍面临更多个人移动设备事故及重伤情况。
J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2020 Oct-Dec;13(4):274-278. doi: 10.4103/JETS.JETS_115_19. Epub 2020 Dec 7.
2
Effortless creation of safe robots from modules through self-programming and self-verification.通过自我编程和自我验证,轻松地从模块创建安全机器人。
Sci Robot. 2019 Jun 19;4(31). doi: 10.1126/scirobotics.aaw1924.
3
Electric Scooter Injuries and Hospital Admissions in the United States, 2014-2018.
美国 2014-2018 年电动滑板车伤害和住院情况。
JAMA Surg. 2020 Apr 1;155(4):357-359. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2019.5423.
4
Development of a Concussion Risk Function for a Youth Population Using Head Linear and Rotational Acceleration.利用头部线性和旋转加速度开发青少年脑震荡风险函数
Ann Biomed Eng. 2020 Jan;48(1):92-103. doi: 10.1007/s10439-019-02382-2. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
5
The price of personal mobility: burden of injury and mortality from personal mobility devices in Singapore - a nationwide cohort study.个人移动的代价:新加坡个人移动设备所致伤害和死亡的负担——一项全国性队列研究。
BMC Public Health. 2019 Jul 4;19(1):880. doi: 10.1186/s12889-019-7210-6.
6
Improved safety standards are needed to better protect younger children at playgrounds.需要提高安全标准,以更好地保护游乐场中的幼儿。
Sci Rep. 2018 Oct 10;8(1):15061. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-33393-z.
7
A design metric for safety assessment of industrial robot design suitable for power- and force-limited collaborative operation.一种适用于功率和力受限协同操作的工业机器人设计安全评估的设计指标。
Int J Intell Robot Appl. 2018;2(2):226-234. doi: 10.1007/s41315-018-0055-9. Epub 2018 Apr 10.
8
Performances of the PIPER scalable child human body model in accident reconstruction.PIPER可扩展儿童人体模型在事故重建中的性能。
PLoS One. 2017 Nov 14;12(11):e0187916. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187916. eCollection 2017.
9
Detailed assessment of pedestrian ground contact injuries observed from in-depth accident data.详细评估从深入事故数据中观察到的行人地面接触伤害。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 Jan;110:9-17. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.10.011. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
10
Falling while walking: A hidden contributor to pedestrian injury.行走时摔倒:行人受伤的一个隐藏因素。
Accid Anal Prev. 2018 May;114:77-82. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.01.010. Epub 2017 Feb 8.