Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning model for predicting post-stroke epilepsy.

BACKGROUND

Epilepsy is a serious complication after an ischemic stroke. Although two studies have developed prediction model for post-stroke epilepsy (PSE), their accuracy remains insufficient, and their applicability to different populations is uncertain. With the rapid advancement of computer technology, machine learning (ML) offers new opportunities for creating more accurate prediction models. However, the potential of ML in predicting PSE is still not well understood. The purpose of this study was to develop prediction models for PSE among ischemic stroke patients.

METHODS

Patients with ischemic stroke from two stroke centers were included in this retrospective cohort study. At the baseline level, 33 input variables were considered candidate features. The 2-year PSE prediction models in the derivation cohort were built using six ML algorithms. The predictive performance of these machine learning models required further appraisal and comparison with the reference model using the conventional triage classification information. The Shapley additive explanation (SHAP), based on fair profit allocation among many stakeholders according to their contributions, is used to interpret the predicted outcomes of the naive Bayes (NB) model.

RESULTS

A total of 1977 patients were included to build the predictive model for PSE. The Boruta method identified NIHSS score, hospital length of stay, D-dimer level, and cortical involvement as the optimal features, with the receiver operating characteristic curves ranging from 0.709 to 0.849. An additional 870 patients were used to validate the ML and reference models. The NB model achieved the best performance among the PSE prediction models with an area under the receiver operating curve of 0.757. At the 20 % absolute risk threshold, the NB model also provided a sensitivity of 0.739 and a specificity of 0.720. The reference model had poor sensitivities of only 0.15 despite achieving a helpful AUC of 0.732. Furthermore, the SHAP method analysis demonstrated that a higher NIHSS score, longer hospital length of stay, higher D-dimer level, and cortical involvement were positive predictors of epilepsy after ischemic stroke.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirmed the feasibility of applying the ML method to use easy-to-obtain variables for accurate prediction of PSE and provided improved strategies and effective resource allocation for high-risk patients. In addition, the SHAP method could improve model transparency and make it easier for clinicians to grasp the prediction model's reliability.