Liou Wen-Ying
Department of Education, National Chiayi University, Chiayi County, Taiwan.
Int J Dev Disabil. 2022 Nov 3;70(4):711-718. doi: 10.1080/20473869.2022.2140252. eCollection 2024.
The purpose of this study was to develop two pictorial tools for assessing the attitudes of Taiwanese male senior high school students with intellectual disabilities toward sexually offensive behavior, focusing on cognitive distortion and victim empathy. A total of 181 male high school students at special education schools participated in this study. The validity and reliability were examined using exploratory factor analysis and Cronbach's alpha coefficient. For the cognitive distortion scale, 18 items grouped into three factors, rationalization, denial, and victim blaming, and explained 69.72% of the variance; for the victim empathy scale, 12 items grouped into two factors, the victim's feelings when the offensive behavior is perpetrated by another, and the victim's feelings when the offensive behavior is perpetrated by oneself, and explained 68.00% of the variance. The reliability was .96 for the cognitive distortion scale and .93 for the victim empathy scale. In conclusion, the two scales developed in this research were found to be reliable and valid tools for evaluating male students' attitudes toward sexually offensive behavior, and can also be used as reference material for courses in sex education.
本研究的目的是开发两种图片工具,用于评估台湾智障男性高中生对性侵犯行为的态度,重点关注认知扭曲和受害者同理心。共有181名特殊教育学校的男性高中生参与了本研究。使用探索性因素分析和克朗巴哈α系数检验了效度和信度。对于认知扭曲量表,18个项目分为三个因素,即合理化、否认和指责受害者,解释了69.72%的方差;对于受害者同理心量表,12个项目分为两个因素,即当他人实施侵犯行为时受害者的感受,以及当自己实施侵犯行为时受害者的感受,解释了68.00%的方差。认知扭曲量表的信度为0.96,受害者同理心量表的信度为0.93。总之,本研究开发的两个量表是评估男性学生对性侵犯行为态度的可靠且有效的工具,也可作为性教育课程的参考材料。