Department of Psychology, University of Hamburg.
Department of Psychology, Humboldt University of Berlin.
Psychol Sci. 2022 Mar;33(3):382-396. doi: 10.1177/09567976211037971. Epub 2022 Feb 22.
Society and developmental theory generally assume that there are wide generational differences in personality. Yet evidence showing historical change in the levels of adult Big Five traits is scarce and particularly so for developmental change. We tracked adult trajectories of personality in 4,732 participants (age: = 52.93 years, = 16.69; 53% female) from the Seattle Longitudinal Study (born 1883-1976) across 50 years. Multilevel models revealed evidence for historical change in personality: At age 56, later-born cohorts exhibited lower levels of maturity-related traits (agreeableness and neuroticism) and higher levels of agency-related traits (extraversion and openness) than earlier-born cohorts. Historical changes in agreeableness and neuroticism were more pronounced among young adults, but changes in openness were less pronounced. Cohort differences in change were rare and were observed only for agreeableness; within-person increases were more pronounced among later-born cohorts. Our results yield the first evidence for historical change in the Big Five across adulthood and point to the roles of delayed social-investment and maturity effects.
社会和发展理论普遍认为,个性在代际之间存在广泛差异。然而,表明成人五大特质水平发生历史变化的证据很少,特别是在发展变化方面。我们在 50 年内追踪了来自西雅图纵向研究(1883 年至 1976 年出生)的 4732 名参与者(年龄:=52.93 岁,=16.69;53%为女性)的人格发展轨迹。多层次模型显示出人格的历史变化的证据:在 56 岁时,出生较晚的队列表现出较低水平的与成熟相关的特质(宜人性和神经质)和较高水平的与能动性相关的特质(外向性和开放性),而出生较早的队列则表现出较高水平的与成熟相关的特质(宜人性和神经质)和较高水平的与能动性相关的特质(外向性和开放性)。宜人性和神经质的历史变化在年轻人中更为明显,但开放性的变化则不太明显。变化中的队列差异很少见,仅在宜人性方面观察到;出生较晚的队列中,个体内的增长更为明显。我们的研究结果首次提供了成人期五大特质发生历史变化的证据,并指出了社会投资延迟和成熟效应的作用。