Tagavi Daina M, Dai Yael G, Berger Natalie I, Petruccelli Marisa, Scott Sabine E, Oosting Devon, Howard Mya, Carter Alice S, Ingersoll Brooke, Wainer Allison L, Broder-Fingert Sarabeth, Stone Wendy L
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, 6200 NE 74th Street, Suite 100, Seattle, WA, 98115, USA.
Department of Psychology, Florida International University, Miami, USA.
J Autism Dev Disord. 2024 Jul 10. doi: 10.1007/s10803-024-06455-7.
COVID-19 required many research teams to shift from in-person to remote assessments, which posed both procedural and theoretical challenges. While research has explored the utility of remote assessments for autism diagnosis from the perspective of families and clinicians, less is known about their application in clinical trials. This paper describes the development of a remote research assessment protocol for a randomized clinical trial focusing on the implementation of reciprocal imitation teaching (RIT) with toddlers in Part C early intervention. This project spans two phases. For Phase 1, our team developed and documented a series of steps utilizing user-centered design (UCD) strategies (e.g., recruiting potential users, creating a prototype, engaging in iterative development) for the purpose of redesigning an assessment protocol for a remote environment. For Phase 2, we examined preliminary outcomes of the redesign process. Primary end users (assessors) rated post-redesign usability and acceptability, while acceptability was examined using attrition data from secondary end users (family participants). Preliminary fidelity of implementation was also examined. The iterative redesign process allowed the research team to refine aspects of the assessment that ultimately led to promising preliminary ratings of usability, acceptability, and feasibility, as well as high fidelity. Preliminary data suggest that the redesigned assessment appears to be an acceptable, feasible, and usable tool for autism clinical trial research and that assessors can use it with fidelity. Further research is needed to examine the reliability and validity of the assessment, as well as implementation characteristics on a larger scale.
新冠疫情使得许多研究团队从面对面评估转向远程评估,这带来了程序和理论上的挑战。虽然已有研究从家庭和临床医生的角度探讨了远程评估在自闭症诊断中的效用,但对于其在临床试验中的应用了解较少。本文描述了一项针对随机临床试验的远程研究评估方案的制定,该试验聚焦于在C部分早期干预中对幼儿实施相互模仿教学(RIT)。该项目分为两个阶段。在第一阶段,我们的团队利用以用户为中心的设计(UCD)策略(例如,招募潜在用户、创建原型、进行迭代开发)制定并记录了一系列步骤,目的是重新设计适用于远程环境的评估方案。在第二阶段,我们检查了重新设计过程的初步结果。主要终端用户(评估人员)对重新设计后的可用性和可接受性进行了评分,同时使用来自次要终端用户(家庭参与者)的损耗数据来检验可接受性。还检查了实施的初步保真度。迭代式重新设计过程使研究团队能够完善评估的各个方面,最终获得了关于可用性、可接受性和可行性的 promising 初步评分,以及高保真度。初步数据表明,重新设计后的评估似乎是自闭症临床试验研究中一种可接受、可行且可用的工具,评估人员可以忠实地使用它。需要进一步研究来检验该评估的可靠性和有效性,以及更大规模的实施特征。