Task-based image quality assessment of an intraoperative CBCT for spine surgery compared with conventional CT.

PURPOSE

To analyze the image quality of a novel, state-of-the art platform for CBCT image-guided spine surgery, focusing particularly on the dose-effectiveness compared with conventional CT (the gold standard for postoperative assessment).

METHODS

The ClarifEye platform (Philips Healthcare) with integrated augmented-reality surgical navigation, has been compared with a GE Revolution CT (GE Healthcare). The 3D spatial resolution (TTF) and noise (NPS) were evaluated considering relevant feature contrasts (200-900 HU) and background noise for differently sized patients (200-300 mm water-equivalent diameter). These measures were used to determine the noise equivalent quanta (NEQ) and observer model detectability.

RESULTS

The CBCT system exhibited a linear response with 50% TTF at 5.7 cycles/cm (10% TTF at 9.2 cycles/cm), and the axial noise power peaking at about 3.6 cycles/cm (average frequency of 4.1 cycles/cm). The noise magnitude and texture differed markedly compared to iteratively reconstructed CT images (GE ASiR-V). The CBCT system had 26% lower detectability for a high-frequency task (related to edge detection) compared with CT images reconstructed using the Bone kernel combined with ASiR-V 50%. Likewise, it had 18% lower detectability for low- and mid-frequency tasks compared with CT images reconstructed using the Standard kernel. This difference translates to 50%-80% higher CBCT imaging doses required to match the CT image quality.

CONCLUSIONS

The ClarifEye platform demonstrates intraoperative CBCT-imaging capabilities that under certain circumstances are comparable with conventional CT. However, due to limited dose-effectiveness, a trade-off between timeliness and radiation exposure must be considered if end-of-procedure CBCT is to replace postoperative CT.