• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估对比增强乳腺摄影中延迟相成像对乳腺癌分期的影响:缩写与完整方案的对比研究。

Evaluating the impact of delayed-phase imaging in Contrast-Enhanced Mammography on breast cancer staging: A comparative study of abbreviated versus complete protocol.

机构信息

SCDU Radiodiagnostica, Ospedale Maggiore Della Carità, 28100, Novara, Italy.

Dipartimento Di Medicina Translazionale, Università del Piemonte Orientale, 28100, Novara, Italy.

出版信息

Radiol Med. 2024 Jul;129(7):989-998. doi: 10.1007/s11547-024-01838-3. Epub 2024 Jul 10.

DOI:10.1007/s11547-024-01838-3
PMID:38987501
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11252175/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) is an innovative imaging tool for breast cancer detection, involving intravenous injection of a contrast medium and the assessment of lesion enhancement in two phases: early and delayed. The aim of the study was to analyze the topographic concordance of lesions detected in the early- versus delayed phase acquisitions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Approved by the Ethics Committee (No. 118/20), this prospective study included 100 women with histopathological confirmed breast neoplasia (B6) at the Radiodiagnostics Department of the Maggiore della Carità Hospital of Novara, Italy from May 1, 2021, to October 17, 2022. Participants underwent CEM examinations using a complete protocol, encompassing both early- and delayed image acquisitions. Three experienced radiologists blindly analyzed the CEM images for contrast enhancement to determine the topographic concordance of the identified lesions. Two readers assessed the complete study (protocol A), while one reader assessed the protocol without the delayed phase (protocol B). The average glandular dose (AGD) of the entire procedure was also evaluated.

RESULTS

The analysis demonstrated high concordance among the three readers in the topographical identification of lesions within individual quadrants of both breasts, with a Cohen's κ > 0.75, except for the lower inner quadrant of the right breast and the retro-areolar region of the left breast. The mean whole AGD was 29.2 mGy. The mean AGD due to CEM amounted to 73% of the whole AGD (21.2 mGy). The AGD attributable to the delayed phase of CEM contributed to 36% of the whole AGD (10.5 mGy).

CONCLUSIONS

As we found no significant discrepancy between the readings of the two protocols, we conclude that delayed-phase image acquisition in CEM does not provide essential diagnostic benefits for effective disease management. Instead, it contributes to unnecessary radiation exposure.

摘要

目的

对比增强乳腺摄影(CEM)是一种用于乳腺癌检测的创新成像工具,包括静脉内注射造影剂,并在早期和延迟两个阶段评估病变增强情况。本研究旨在分析早期和延迟采集获得的病变在影像学上的一致性。

材料和方法

本前瞻性研究于 2021 年 5 月 1 日至 2022 年 10 月 17 日在意大利诺瓦拉马焦雷慈善医院放射科进行,共纳入 100 名经组织病理学证实患有乳腺肿瘤(B6)的女性。该研究获得了伦理委员会的批准(编号 118/20)。参与者接受了完整的 CEM 检查方案,包括早期和延迟图像采集。三名经验丰富的放射科医生对 CEM 图像进行了增强分析,以确定所识别病变的影像学位置一致性。两位读者评估了完整的研究(方案 A),而一位读者评估了没有延迟期的方案(方案 B)。还评估了整个过程的平均腺体剂量(AGD)。

结果

三位读者在单独评估双侧乳房各象限的病变位置时,除了右乳下内象限和左乳乳晕后区域外,其余病变的κ 值均>0.75,具有高度一致性。整个过程的平均 AGD 为 29.2 mGy。CEM 的平均 AGD 占整个 AGD 的 73%(21.2 mGy)。CEM 延迟期的 AGD 占整个 AGD 的 36%(10.5 mGy)。

结论

由于我们在两个方案的阅读结果之间未发现明显差异,因此我们得出结论,CEM 的延迟期图像采集对于有效的疾病管理并没有提供重要的诊断益处。相反,它会导致不必要的辐射暴露。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a159/11252175/dd1708654c30/11547_2024_1838_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a159/11252175/a992123c53f4/11547_2024_1838_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a159/11252175/31e484dac36e/11547_2024_1838_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a159/11252175/9edf22f3e502/11547_2024_1838_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a159/11252175/215ebd22bd40/11547_2024_1838_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a159/11252175/dde7e3969cd2/11547_2024_1838_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a159/11252175/7be97df37268/11547_2024_1838_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a159/11252175/5168a6f2ca51/11547_2024_1838_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a159/11252175/dd1708654c30/11547_2024_1838_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a159/11252175/a992123c53f4/11547_2024_1838_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a159/11252175/31e484dac36e/11547_2024_1838_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a159/11252175/9edf22f3e502/11547_2024_1838_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a159/11252175/215ebd22bd40/11547_2024_1838_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a159/11252175/dde7e3969cd2/11547_2024_1838_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a159/11252175/7be97df37268/11547_2024_1838_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a159/11252175/5168a6f2ca51/11547_2024_1838_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a159/11252175/dd1708654c30/11547_2024_1838_Fig8_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating the impact of delayed-phase imaging in Contrast-Enhanced Mammography on breast cancer staging: A comparative study of abbreviated versus complete protocol.评估对比增强乳腺摄影中延迟相成像对乳腺癌分期的影响:缩写与完整方案的对比研究。
Radiol Med. 2024 Jul;129(7):989-998. doi: 10.1007/s11547-024-01838-3. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
2
Multireader comparison of contrast-enhanced mammography versus the combination of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the preoperative assessment of breast cancer.多阅读器对比增强乳腺摄影与数字乳腺摄影和数字乳腺断层合成在乳腺癌术前评估中的联合应用。
Radiol Med. 2021 Nov;126(11):1407-1414. doi: 10.1007/s11547-021-01400-5. Epub 2021 Jul 24.
3
Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: Does mammography provide additional clinical benefits or can some radiation exposure be avoided?对比增强光谱乳腺摄影术:乳腺摄影术是否能提供额外的临床益处,或者能否避免一些辐射暴露?
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014 Jul;146(2):371-81. doi: 10.1007/s10549-014-3023-6. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
4
Breast radiation dose with contrast-enhanced mammography-guided biopsy: a retrospective comparison with stereotactic and tomosynthesis guidance.对比增强乳腺钼靶引导活检的乳腺辐射剂量:与立体定向和断层合成引导的回顾性比较
Eur Radiol. 2025 Apr;35(4):2119-2129. doi: 10.1007/s00330-024-10920-3. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
5
Single Center Evaluation of Comparative Breast Radiation dose of Contrast Enhanced Digital Mammography (CEDM), Digital Mammography (DM) and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT).单中心对比增强数字乳腺摄影术(CEDM)、数字乳腺摄影术(DM)和数字乳腺断层合成术(DBT)的乳腺辐射剂量比较评估。
Acad Radiol. 2022 Sep;29(9):1342-1349. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2021.12.022. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
6
Average glandular dose in paired digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis acquisitions in a population based screening program: effects of measuring breast density, air kerma and beam quality.在基于人群的筛查计划中,双侧数字乳腺摄影和数字乳腺断层合成采集的平均腺体剂量:测量乳房密度、空气比释动能和射束质量的影响。
Phys Med Biol. 2018 Jan 25;63(3):035006. doi: 10.1088/1361-6560/aaa614.
7
Addition of Contrast-enhanced Mammography to Tomosynthesis for Breast Cancer Detection in Women with a Personal History of Breast Cancer: Prospective TOCEM Trial Interim Analysis.增强型乳腺 X 光摄影术联合断层合成乳腺摄影术在有乳腺癌个人病史的女性乳腺癌检测中的应用:前瞻性 TOCEM 试验中期分析。
Radiology. 2024 Apr;311(1):e231991. doi: 10.1148/radiol.231991.
8
Evaluation of average glandular dose and investigation of the relationship with compressed breast thickness in dual energy contrast enhanced digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.双能增强数字乳腺摄影与数字乳腺断层合成中平均腺体剂量的评估及其与压缩乳腺厚度的关系研究。
Eur J Radiol. 2020 May;126:108912. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108912. Epub 2020 Mar 3.
9
Breast Radiation Dose With CESM Compared With 2D FFDM and 3D Tomosynthesis Mammography.对比二维全视野数字化乳腺摄影(2D FFDM)和三维乳腺断层合成摄影,乳腺增强合成钼靶(CESM)的乳腺辐射剂量
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2017 Feb;208(2):362-372. doi: 10.2214/AJR.16.16743.
10
CEM immediately after contrast-enhanced CT: a one-step staging of breast cancer.CE-MRI 即刻增强扫描:乳腺癌的一站式分期。
Eur Radiol Exp. 2024 Apr 1;8(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s41747-024-00440-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Radiological Assessment After Pancreaticoduodenectomy for a Precision Approach to Managing Complications: A Narrative Review.胰十二指肠切除术后的影像学评估:精准处理并发症的方法——一篇叙述性综述
J Pers Med. 2025 May 28;15(6):220. doi: 10.3390/jpm15060220.
2
Contrast-enhanced mammography in high-dense breasts: a narrative review.高密度乳腺的对比增强乳腺造影术:一项叙述性综述。
Transl Breast Cancer Res. 2025 Mar 10;6:15. doi: 10.21037/tbcr-24-64. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Breast cancer screening in women with extremely dense breasts recommendations of the European Society of Breast Imaging (EUSOBI).欧洲乳腺影像学会(EUSOBI)关于致密型乳腺女性乳腺癌筛查的建议。
Eur Radiol. 2022 Jun;32(6):4036-4045. doi: 10.1007/s00330-022-08617-6. Epub 2022 Mar 8.
2
Single Center Evaluation of Comparative Breast Radiation dose of Contrast Enhanced Digital Mammography (CEDM), Digital Mammography (DM) and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis (DBT).单中心对比增强数字乳腺摄影术(CEDM)、数字乳腺摄影术(DM)和数字乳腺断层合成术(DBT)的乳腺辐射剂量比较评估。
Acad Radiol. 2022 Sep;29(9):1342-1349. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2021.12.022. Epub 2022 Jan 19.
3
Contrast-enhanced Mammography: State of the Art.
对比增强乳腺摄影:现状。
Radiology. 2021 Apr;299(1):36-48. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021201948. Epub 2021 Mar 2.
4
Quantitative Analysis of Enhancement Intensity and Patterns on Contrast-enhanced Spectral Mammography.对比增强光谱乳腺摄影增强强度和模式的定量分析。
Sci Rep. 2020 Jun 17;10(1):9807. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-66501-z.
5
Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Spectral Mammography in Comparison to Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Breast Lesions.对比增强光谱乳腺摄影与磁共振成像在乳腺病变诊断中的价值比较
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2019 Mar/Apr;43(2):245-251. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000832.
6
Quantitative analysis of enhanced malignant and benign lesions on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography.对比增强光谱乳腺摄影术中良恶性病变强化的定量分析。
Br J Radiol. 2018 Jun;91(1086):20170605. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170605. Epub 2018 Feb 27.
7
A comparison of five methods of measuring mammographic density: a case-control study.五种测量乳腺密度方法的比较:病例对照研究。
Breast Cancer Res. 2018 Feb 5;20(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13058-018-0932-z.
8
Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography vs. mammography and MRI - clinical performance in a multi-reader evaluation.对比增强光谱乳腺摄影术与乳腺摄影术和磁共振成像的多阅片者评估中的临床性能
Eur Radiol. 2017 Jul;27(7):2752-2764. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4650-6. Epub 2016 Nov 28.
9
Contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) versus breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): A retrospective comparison in 66 breast lesions.对比增强光谱乳腺摄影(CESM)与乳腺磁共振成像(MRI):66例乳腺病变的回顾性比较
Diagn Interv Imaging. 2017 Feb;98(2):113-123. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2016.08.013. Epub 2016 Sep 26.
10
Mammographic breast density: impact on breast cancer risk and implications for screening.乳腺钼靶密度:对乳腺癌风险的影响及对筛查的意义。
Radiographics. 2015 Mar-Apr;35(2):302-15. doi: 10.1148/rg.352140106.