Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Xuhui District, #270 Dongan' Road, Shanghai, 200032, China.
Department of Oncology, Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
BMC Gastroenterol. 2024 Jul 10;24(1):220. doi: 10.1186/s12876-024-03318-4.
To evaluate the clinical value of serum CEA levels and their implications on the diagnostic value of the conventional TNM staging system in the oldest-old patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).
The recruited subjects were colorectal cancer patients aged 85 and older. The cutoff value for normal CEA level is 5 ng/mL. Patients with elevated CEA levels were categorized as stage C1, and those with normal CEA levels as stage C0. A number of Cox proportional hazard regression models were established to evaluate the prognosis of different prognostic factors with hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The Kaplan-Meier method was utilized to display the disparate prognostic impact of multiple clinicopathological factors with the log-rank test.
A total of 17,359 oldest-old patients diagnosed with CRC were recruited from the SEER database. The conditional survival of oldest-old patients with CRC was dismal with a 1-year conditional survival of only 11%, 18%, and 30% for patients surviving 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Patients with stage C1 exhibited a 48.5% increased risk of CRC-specific mortality compared with stage C0 (HR = 1.485, 95%CI = 1.393-1.583, using stage C0 patients as the reference, P < 0.001). All the stage C0 patients indicated lower HRs relative to the corresponding stage C1 patients.
Dismal conditional survival of oldest-old patients with CRC should be given additional consideration. C stage influences the prognosis of oldest-old patients with CRC.
评估血清 CEA 水平在 85 岁及以上结直肠癌(CRC)患者中的临床价值及其对传统 TNM 分期系统诊断价值的影响。
本研究纳入了年龄在 85 岁及以上的结直肠癌患者。正常 CEA 水平的截断值为 5ng/mL。CEA 水平升高的患者归为 C1 期,CEA 水平正常的患者归为 C0 期。采用 Cox 比例风险回归模型评估不同预后因素的预后,用风险比(HR)及其 95%置信区间(CI)表示。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法和 Log-rank 检验评估多个临床病理因素的不同预后影响。
本研究从 SEER 数据库中纳入了 17359 例 85 岁及以上的 CRC 患者。CRC 高龄患者的条件生存较差,1 年、3 年和 5 年的条件生存率分别为 11%、18%和 30%。与 C0 期患者相比,C1 期患者 CRC 特异性死亡的风险增加了 48.5%(HR=1.485,95%CI=1.393-1.583,以 C0 期患者为参照,P<0.001)。所有 C0 期患者的 HR 均低于相应的 C1 期患者。
CRC 高龄患者的条件生存较差,应给予额外关注。C 期影响 CRC 高龄患者的预后。